This paper examined reasons why information pertaining to nonhuman animal welfare and liberation should be introduced during childhood. Studies indicate that animal-welfare activists’ and abolitionists’ efforts to date may be insufficient given the pervasive environmental destruction and ongoing animal suffering. Moreover, research reveals that education related to animal welfare and liberation is systematically excluded from children’s education, and they thus remain unaware of the sources and associated health hazards of meat they consume. Conversely, children’s knowledge about animal welfare increases when exposed to literature on the topic, which enables them to make informed choices regarding meat consumption. This paper draws on animal-welfare and liberation literature to argue that augmenting children’s knowledge about animal welfare and liberation can foster children’s understanding, language, philosophy, and ability to make informed choices about their relationship with animals and the environment in general.
Agriculture Victoria. (2016October10). Australian animal welfare standards and guidelines. Retrieved from http://agriculture.vic.gov.au/agriculture/animal-health-and-welfare/australian-animal-welfare-standards-and-guidelines.
AguirreV. & OrihuelaA. (2010). Assessment of the impact of an animal welfare educational course with first grade children in rural schools in the state of Morelos, Mexico. Early Childhood Education Journal38(1) 27-31. doi:10.1007/s10643-010-0384-2.
Andersen K. & Kuhn K. (Producers & Directors). (2014). Cowspiracy: The sustainability secret [Motion picture]. United States: A.U.M. Films/First Spark Media.
AscioneF. R. & WeberC. V. (1996). Children’s attitudes about the humane treatment of animals and empathy: One-year follow up of a school-based intervention. Anthrozoos9(4) 188-195. doi:10.2752/089279396787001455.
BestS. (2009). The rise of critical animal studies: Putting theory into action and animal liberation into higher education. Journal for Critical Animal Studies7(1) 9-52. Retrieved from http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/volume-vii-issue-i-2009/.
RocheleauJ. (2004). Theoretical roots of service-learning: Progressive education and the development of citizenship. In B.Speck & S.Hoppe (Eds.) Service-learning: History theory and issues (pp. 3-21). Westport, CT: Praeger.
RoweB. D. (2011). Understanding animals-becoming-meat: Embracing a disturbing education. Critical Education2(7) 1-25. Retrieved from http://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/182311.
RoweB. D. (2012). Food, habit, and the consumption of animals as educational encounter. In C. W.Ruitenberg (Ed.) Philosophy of education 2012 (pp. 210-218). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
SanbonmatsuJ. (2014). The animal of bad faith: Speciesism as an existential project. In J.Sorenson (Ed.) Critical animal studies: Thinking the unthinkable (pp. 29-45). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
SinhaR.CrossA. J.GraubardB. I.LeitzmannM. F. & SchatzkinA. (2009). Meat intake and mortality: A prospective study of over half a million people. Archives of Internal Medicine169(6) 562-571. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.6.
United Nations Division for Sustainable Development. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.
World Health Organization. (2015October29). Links between processed meat and colorectal cancer: WHO statement. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2015/processed-meat-cancer/en/.