Divergent Approaches Regulating Beta Agonists and Cloning of Animals for Food: USA and European Union

in Society & Animals
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Technologies being used to produce nonhuman animals who are used for meat and dairy products are viewed by some people as meaningful. Two technologies receiving scrutiny in agriculture are beta agonists that are fed to food animals to improve weight gain and cloning animals to secure offspring with specific traits. The technologies enhance the productive capacities of animals so that fewer resources are needed to produce meat and dairy products. Yet consumers are not sure they want food products with beta agonist residues and that are produced from clones. In overseeing the safety of food products and animals, legislators and regulators in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) have developed contrasting provisions regarding the usage of these technologies. An evaluation of heuristics involving information and experiences with bovine spongiform encephalopathy and animal production technologies offers support in explaining the US’s and EU’s divergent provisions.

Divergent Approaches Regulating Beta Agonists and Cloning of Animals for Food: USA and European Union

in Society & Animals

Sections

References

American Veterinary Medical Association. (2014). Use of β-Adrenoreceptor Agonists (pp. 1-7). May 9 2014Washington, DC.

AndrewsN. J. (2012). Incidence of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease diagnoses and deaths in the UK January 1994-December 2011. United Kingdom Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Research and Surveillance Unit July 2 2012.

BarnesA.SutherlandL.-A.TomaL.MatthewsK. & ThomsonS. (2016). The effect of the Common Agricultural Policy reforms on intentions towards food production: Evidence from livestock farmers. Land Use Policy 50548-558.

BaynesR. E.DedonderK.KissellL.MzykD.MarmulakT.RiviereJ. E. (2016). Health concerns and management of select veterinary drug residues. Food and Chemical Toxicology 88112-122.

BoriesG.BrantomP.Brufau de BarberàJ.ChessonA.CocconcelliP. S.WesterP. (2009). Safety evaluation of ractopamine: ESFA panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP). European Food Safety Authority Journal 10411-52.

BovéJ. & DefourF. (2001). The world is not for sale. New York: Verso.

BoydB. M.ShakelfordS. D.HalesK. E.Brown-BrandlT. M.BremerM. L.EricksonG. E. (2015). Effects of shade and feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride to finishing steers on performance, carcass quality, heat stress, mobility, and body temperature. Journal of Animal Science 935801-5811.

BudkaH. (2011). Editorial: The European response to BSE: A success story. European Food Safety Authority Journal 9(9) e991.

CentnerT. J. (2016). Recent government regulations in the United States seek to ensure the effectiveness of antibiotics by limiting their agricultural use. Environment International 941-7.

EdwardsJ. L.SchrickF. N.McCrackenM. D.van AmstelS. R.HopkinsF. M. & DaviesC. J. (2003). Cloning adult farm animals: A review of the possibilities and problems associated with somatic cell nuclear transfer. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 50(2) 113-123.

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). (2007). The risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems. European Food Safety Authority Journal 6111-13.

EFSA. (2008). Final scientific opinion on the food safety, animal health and welfare and environmental impact of animals derived from cloning by Somatic Cell Nucleus Transfer (SCNT) and their offspring and products obtained from those animals. European Food Safety Authority Journal 7671-49.

EFSA. (2012). Update on the state of play of animal health and welfare and environmental impact of animals derived from SCNT cloning and their offspring, and food safety of products obtained from those animals. European Food Safety Authority Journal 10(7) 27941-42.

EFSA. (2014). Statement on a conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives re-evaluated under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010. EFSA Panel on Food additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food. European Food Safety Authority Journal 12(6) 36971-11.

EU. (1996). Council Directive 96/22/EC of 29 April 1996. O.J. (L 125) 3-8.

EU. (1998a). Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998. O.J. (L221) 23-27.

EU. (1998b). Council Regulation No 2821/98 of 17 December 1998. O.J. (L 351) 4-8.

EU. (1999). Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999. O.J. (L203) 53-57.

EU. (2001). Council Directive 2001/88/EC of 23 October 2001. O.J. (L 316) 1-12.

EU. (2008). Council Directive 2009/120/EC of 18 December 2008. O.J. (L 47) 5-13.

European Commission. (1981). Council Directive 81/602/EEC of 31 July 1981. O.J. (L 222) 32-33.

European Commission. (1988). Council Directive 88/146/EEC of 7 March 1988. O.J. (L 70) 16-18.

European Commission. (2001). Commission Directive 2001/93/EC of 9 November 2001 amending Directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. O.J. (L 316) 36-38.

European Commission. (2013a). COM(2013)892 final. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the cloning of animals of the bovine porcine ovine caprine and equine species kept and reproduced for farming purposes. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013PC0892&from=EN.

European Commission. (2013b). COM(2013)893. Proposal for a Council Directive on the Placing on the Market of Food from Animal Clones. Retrieved from http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/document/COM20130893.do.

European Commission. (2015). Study on the labelling of products from cloned animals and their offspring. Brussels: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development.

European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2002). Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of 28 January 2002. O.J. (L31) 1-24.

European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2015). Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of 25 November 2015. O.J. (L 327) 1-22.

FinucaneM. L. & HolupJ. L. (2005). Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: An overview of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 601603-1612.

FriedrichB. & WilsonS. (2015). Coming home to roost: How the chicken industry hurts chickens, humans, and the environment. Animal Law 22103-164.

GeurtenM.WillemsS.GermainS. & MeulemansT. (2015). Less is more: The availability heuristic in early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 33405-410.

GonzalezJ. M.CarterJ. N.JohnsonD. D.OuelletteS. E. & JohnsonS. E. (2007). Effect of ractopamine-hydrochloride and trenbolone acetate on longissimus muscle fiber area, diameter, and satellite cell numbers in cull beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 851893-1901.

GrandinT. (2013). Zilpaterol riddle. Beef. November 2013 30 & 34.

HaackS. (2003). Defending science—Within reason: Between scientism and cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

HughlettM. (2013). Cattle feed additive is pulled from the market. Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN) August 17 2013 p. 1D.

JasanoffS. (2005). Design on nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

KangS. (2013). Irrationality and regulation: Constructing mad cow knowledge in the US-South Korea FTA. Globalizations 10(4) 587-601.

LarsenM. L. V.AndersonH. M.-L. & PedersenL. J. (2015). Can tail damage outbreaks in the pig be predicted by behavioural change? Veterinary Journal 20950-56.

LatherP. (2010). Engaging science policy: From the side of the messy. New York: Peter Lang.

LeanI. J.ThompsonJ. M. & DunsheaF. R. (2014). A meta-analysis of zilpaterol and ractopamine effects on feedlot performance, carcass traits and shear strength of meat in cattle. PLOS ONE 9(12) 1-28.

LiuX.WangY.TianY.YuY.GaoM.ZhangY. (2016). Generation of mastitis resistance in cows by targeting human lysozyme gene to b-casein locus using zinc-finger nucleases. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 28120133368.

LivelyT. (2013). Technical trade barriers facing U.S. meat exports. Choices 28(1) 1-3.

LoneraganG. H.ThomsonD. U. & ScottH. M. (2014). Increased mortality in groups of cattle administered the b-adrenergic agonists ractopamine hydrochloride and zilpaterol hydrochloride. PLOS ONE 9(3) 1-13.

LupienJ. R. (2002). The precautionary principle and other non-tariff barriers to free and fair international food trade. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 42(4) 403-415.

MaseA. S.ChoH. & ProkopyL. S. (2015). Enhancing the social amplification of risk framework (SARF) by exploring trust, the availability heuristic, and agricultural advisors’ belief in climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology 41166-176.

MathenyG. & LeahyC. (2007). Farm-animal welfare, legislation, and trade. Law & Contemporary Problems 70(1) 326-358.

MersmannH. J. (2002). Beta-adrenergic receptor modulation of adipocyte metabolism and growth. Journal of Animal Science 80E24-E29.

MillerK. C. (2009). The limitations of heuristics for political elites. Political Psychology 30(6) 863-894.

Morag-LevineN. (2014). The history of precaution. American Journal of Comparative Law 621095-1131.

PachurT.HertwigR. & SteinmannF. (2012). How do people judge risks: Availability heuristic, affect heuristic, or both? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18(3) 314-330.

PetetinL. (2009). Clone Wars? The challenges of cloned food in EU, US and WTO Law. Environmental Law Review 11246-263.

PetetinL. (2012). The revival of modern agricultural biotechnology by the UK government: What role for animal cloning? European Food & Feed Law Review 6296-311.

PetetinL. (2017). Precaution and equivalence—The critical interplay in EU biotech foods. European Law Review 42831-847.

PolettoR.MeiseR. L.RichertB. T.ChengH. W. & Marchant-FordeJ. N. (2010). Behavior and peripheral amine concentrations in relation to ractopamine feeding, sex, and social rank of finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 881184-1194.

RaultJ.-L.Lay Jr.D. C. & Marchant-FordeJ. N. (2011). Castration induced pain in pigs and other livestock. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135214-225.

SaltelliA. & FuntowiczS. (2004). The precautionary principle: Implications for risk management strategies. International Journal of Occupational and Medical Environmental Health 17(1) 47-58.

SchweihoferJ. P. & BuskirkD. D. (2016). Farm to fork—Part 1 - Antibiotics and hormones. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Department of Animal Science. Retrieved from http://fec.msue.msu.edu/uploads/files/2016_FEC/Hormones_-_Buskirk_-_FEC.pdf.

SneeringerS.MacDonaldJ.KeyN.McBrideW. & MathewsK. (2015). Economics of antibiotic use in U.S. livestock production. USDA Economic Research Report No. 2000 November 2015.

StoutenboroughJ. W.VedlitzA. & XingX. (2016). Are all risk perceptions created equal? Comparing general risk assessments and specific risk assessments associated with climate change. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 22(1) 50-70.

StrechD. & TilburtJ. (2008). Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61(6) 521-524.

SutherlandM. A. & TuckerC. B. (2011). The long and short of it: A review of tail docking in farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135179-191.

ThomsonD. U.LoneraganG. H.HenningsonJ. N.EnsleyS. & BawaB. (2015). Description of a novel fatigue syndrome of finished feedlot cattle following transportation. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 247(1) 66-72.

US CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). (2013). CDC and food safety. Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/PDFs/CDC-and-Food-Safety.pdf.

US CDC. (2014). Confirmed variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (variant CJD) case in Texas. Atlanta, GAOctober 7 2014. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/prions/vcjd/news.html.

US Center for Veterinary Medicine. (2008). Animal cloning: A risk assessment. Rockville, MD.

US Congress. (2003). Expressing sense of the House supporting United States in its efforts in WTO to end European Union’s trade practices regarding biotechnology. Congressional Record H5106-H5136 House of Representatives June 10 2003. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/crec/2003/06/10/CREC-2003-06-10.pdf.

US FDA (Food and Drug Administration). (1993). Animal drugs, feeds, and related products; sterile sometribove zinc suspension. Federal Register 5859946-59947.

US FDA. (2000). New animal drugs for use in animal feeds; ractopamine hydrochloride. Federal Register 65(17) 4111-4112.

US FDA. (2003). New animal drugs; ractopamine. Federal Register 68(181) 54658-54660.

US FDA. (2006). New animal drugs; zilpaterol final rule. Federal Register 71(224) 53005-53006.

US FDA. (2008). Animal cloning and food safety. January 2008. Retrieved fromhttps://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm148768.htm.

US FDA. (2010). Task force on the utilization of science in regulatory decision making: Preliminary report and recommendations. August 2010.

US FDA. (2014). Animal cloning: Myths about cloning. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/SafetyHealth/AnimalCloning/ucm055512.htm.

US FDA. (2015). Genetically engineered animals: General Q&A. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/ucm113605.htm.

US Office of Science and Technology Policy. (1986). Coordinated framework for the regulation of biotechnology. Federal Register 51(26) 23302-23350.

WeinerJ.RogersM. D.HammittJ. K. & SandP. H. (2014). The reality of precaution: Comparing risk regulation in the US and Europe. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

WHO and FAO. (2015). Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. WHO Technical Report Series 988Seventy-eighth Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 30 30 20
Full Text Views 23 23 13
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0