Kill Your Favorite Dish: Examining the Role of New Carnivorism in Perpetuating Meat Eating

in Society & Animals
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Abstract

Scholars and activists opposing the killing of nonhuman animals have long shared the assumption that the invisibility of the animals killed for meat is one of the most significant factors when it comes to explaining how meat eating is perpetuated. However, a recent tendency towards a new visibility of these animals and their physical transformation into meat fundamentally challenges this assumption. The present paper addresses this discrepancy by examining an example of what has been described as “New Carnivorism” in the form of a Danish TV show called Kill Your Favorite Dish. The paper finds that in the show, visibility is in fact instrumental in justifying meat eating, as it is constitutive of a complex narrative about awareness, authenticity, pleasure, and respect. This points to a need for more nuanced understandings of how invisibility and visibility of nonhuman animals are at work in enabling the continuance of meat eating.

Sections
References
  • AdamsC. (1990). The Sexual Politics of Meat. New York: Continuum.

  • BacchiC. (1999). Women Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: Sage Publications.

  • BacchiC. (2009). Analyzing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be. French Forest: Pearson.

  • ColeM. & StewartK. (2014). Our Children and Other Animals. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Danish Broadcasting Corporation. (2014). Dræb din livret. Retrieved from https://www.dr.dk/presse/draeb-din-livret.

    • Export Citation
  • Danish Broadcasting Corporation. (2015). DR-programmer får særlig opmærksomhed i Cannes. In DR. Retrieved from https://www.dr.dk/om-dr/nyheder/dr-programmer-faar-saerlig-opmaerksomhed-i-cannes.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ekstra Bladet. (2014). Bubber vært på blodigt slagteprogram. In Ekstrabladet. Retrieved from http://ekstrabladet.dk/flash/filmogtv/tv/article5287783.ece.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EliasN. (1994). The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • GutjahrJ. (2013). The reintegration of animals and slaughter into discourses of meat eating. In H. Röcklinsberg & P. Sandin (Eds.) The Ethics of Consumption: The Citizen the Market and the Law (pp. 379-385). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JoyM. (2010). Why We Love Dogs Eat Pigs and Wear Cows. San Francisco, CA: Conari Press.

  • JoyM. (2012). Understanding neocarnism: How vegan advocates can appreciate and respond to ‘happy meat’, locavorism, and ‘paleo dieting’. In One Green Planet. Retrieved from www.onegreenplanet.org/lifestyle/understanding-neocarnism.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LinnéT. (2014). Grazing the green fields of social media. In E.A. CederholmA. BjörckK. Jennbert & A. Lönngren (Eds.) Exploring the Animal Turn. Human-Animal Relations in Science Society and Culture. Lund: Lund University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacLachlanI. (2008). Humanitarian reform, slaughter technology, and butcher resistance in nineteenth-century Britain. In P.Y. Lee (Ed.) Meat Modernity and the Rise of the Slaughterhouse. Lebanon, NH: University of New Hampshire Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MorganK. & MatthewC. (2011). The discursive representation of nonhuman animals in a culture of denial. In B. Carter & N. Charles (Eds.) Human and Other Animals. Critical Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParryJ. (2009). Oryx and crake and the new nostalgia for meat. Society & Animals17241-256.

  • ParryJ. (2010). Gender and slaughter in popular gastronomy. Feminism & Psychology20(3) 381-396.

  • PollanM. (2006). The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. New York: Penguin Press.

  • TNS Gallup. (2014). Pressemeddelelse. Seertal uge 46. In Seer-Undersøgelsen. Retrieved from http://tvm.gallup.dk/tvm/pm/.

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 109 109 23
Full Text Views 18 18 8
PDF Downloads 5 5 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0