Attitudes and Intentions Regarding Animal-Assisted Interventions: Associated Variables Among Southern Spanish Psychologists
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Javier López-Cepero Borrego in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Lidia Catalina Navarro in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Joaquín Ruiz Estrada in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This study examined acceptance of animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) among Spanish psychologists (N = 332; mostly women). Participants reported attachment to animals, empathy, anthropomorphism, attitudes toward AAI, AAI knowledge, and intention to use AAI. Although less than 20% had AAI training, over 85% of participants were interested in using AAIs. Considering companion animals as human social equivalents and having specific AAI training were associated with more positive expectations of AAI, while personal distress was negatively associated. The variables influencing interest in developing AAI were positive attitudes, anthropomorphism, being female, and training, explaining 59% of the variance. Results showed that AAIs have high acceptance among psychology professionals, but interest in implementation was stronger when participants had positive attitudes toward AAI, showed high levels of anthropomorphism, and were female, rather than as a result of AAI training. Representing and publicizing AAIs as evidence-based treatments is important to enhance professional growth in the field.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Animal Assisted Intervention International. (2013). General standards of practice for animal assisted activity, animal assisted education, animal assisted therapy and animal support. http://www.aai-int.org.
-
Amiot, C.E., & Bastian, B. (2017). Solidarity with animals: Assessing a relevant dimension of social identification with animals. PloS ONE, 12 (1), e0168184. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168184.
-
Apostol, L., Rebega, O.L., & Miclea, M. (2013). Psychological and socio-demographic predictors of attitudes toward animals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 521–525. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.343.
-
Berget, B., & Grepperud, S. (2011). Animal-assisted interventions for psychiatric patients: Beliefs in treatment effects among practitioners. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 3, e91–e96. DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2011.03.001.
-
Berget, B., Grepperud, S., Aasland, O.G., & Braastad, B.O. (2013). Animal-assisted interventions and psychiatric disorders: Knowledge and attitudes among general practitioners, psychiatrists, and psychologists. Society & Animals, 21, 284–293. DOI: 10.1163/15685306-12341244.
-
Bibbo, J. (2013). Staff members’ perceptions of an animal-assisted activity. Oncology Nursing Forum, 40, E320–E326. DOI: 10.1188/13.ONF.E320-E326.
-
Black, A.F., Chur-Hansen, A., & Winefield, H.R. (2011). Australian psychologists’ knowledge of and attitudes towards animal‐assisted therapy. Clinical Psychologist, 15, 69–77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-9552.2011.00026.x.
-
Brown, C.M., & McLean, J.L. (2015). Anthropomorphizing dogs: Projecting one’s own personality and consequences for supporting animal rights. Anthrozoös, 28, 73–86. DOI: 10.2752/089279315X14129350721975.
-
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Erlbaum.
-
Crossman, M.K. & Kazdin, A.E. (2017). Perceptions of animal-assisted interventions: The influence of attitudes toward companion animals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74, 566–578. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22548.
-
Ferrando, P.J. & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2016). A note on improving EAP trait estimation in oblique factor-analytic and item response theory models. Psicológica, 37, 235–247.
-
González, M.T., Quezada, L.C. & Landero, R. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale: Mexican version (LAPS-M). Anthrozoös, 27, 351–359. DOI: 10.2752/175303714X13903827487926.
-
Herzog, H. (2007). Gender differences in human-animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoös, 20, 7–21. DOI: 10.2752/089279307780216687.
-
Herzog, H. (2011). The impact of pets on human health and psychological well-being: Fact, fiction, or hypothesis? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 236–239. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411415220.
-
Ingoglia, S., LoCoco, A., & Albiero, P. (2016). Development of a brief form of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (B–IRI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 461–471, DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1149858.
-
Johnson, T., Garrity, T., & Stallones, L. (1992). Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS). Anthrozoös, 5, 160–117. DOI: 10.2752/08927939 2787011395.
-
Letheren, K., Kuhn, K.A.L., Lings, I., & Pope, N.K.L. (2016). Individual difference factors related to anthropomorphic tendency. European Journal of Marketing, 50, 973–1002. DOI: 10.1108/EJM-05-2014-0291.
-
López-Cepero, J. (Ed.). (2019). Animales de compañía y salud: Del vínculo humano-animal al diseño de intervenciones asistidas por animales [Companion animals and health: From human-animal bond to the design of animal-assisted interventions]. Pirámide.
-
López-Cepero, J. (2020). Current status of animal-assisted interventions in scientific literature: a critical comment on their internal validity. Animals, 10, 985. DOI:10.3390 /ani10060985.
-
López-Cepero, J., Perea-Mediavilla, M.A., Sarasola, J.L., & Tejada, A. (2015). Influence of biographical variables and academic background on attitudes towards animal-assisted interventions. Human-Animal Interaction Bulletin, 3, 1–10.
-
López-Cepero, J., Perea-Mediavilla, M.A., Tejada, A., & Sarasola, J.L. (2015). Validación del cuestionario de actitudes ante las intervenciones asistidas por perros (CAINTAP) en estudiantes universitarios del sur de España [Validation of the questionnaire on attitudes towards dog assisted interventions (CAINTAP) among Southern Spanish college students: Perceived benefits and fears]. Alternativas: Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 22, 123–138. DOI: 10.14198/ALTERN2015.22.07.
-
Martos-Montes, R., Ordóñez-Pérez, D., De la Fuente, I., Martos-Luque, R., & García Viedma, M.R. (2015). Intervención asistida con animales (IAA): Análisis de la situación en España [Animal-assisted intervention (AAI): The current situation in Spain]. Escritos de Psicología, 8, 1–10. DOI: 10.5231/psy.writ.2015.2004.
-
Menor-Campos, D.J., Knight, S., Sánchez-Muñoz, C., & López-Rodríguez, R. (2019). Human-directed empathy and attitudes toward animal use: A survey of Spanish veterinary students. Anthrozoös, 32, 471–487. DOI: 10.1080/08927936.2019.1621518.
-
Moody, W.J., King, R., & O’Rourke, S. (2002). Attitudes of paediatric medical ward staff to a dog visitation programme. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11, 537–544. DOI: 10.1046 /j.1365–2702.2002.00618.x.
-
Rabbit, S.M., Kazdin, A.E., & Hong, J.E. (2014). Acceptability of animal-assisted therapy: Attitudes toward AAT, psychotherapy, and medication for the treatment of child disruptive behavioral problems. Anthrozoös, 27, 335–350. DOI: 10.2752/175303714X13903827487881.
-
Risley-Curtiss, C., Rogge, M.E., & Kawan, E. (2013). Factors affecting social workers’ inclusion of animals in practice. Social Work, 58, 153–161. DOI: 10.1093/sw/swt009.
-
Taylor, N., & Signal, T.D. (2005). Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoös, 18, 18–27. DOI: 10.2752/089279305785594342.
-
Thew, K., Marco, L., Erdman, P., & Caro, B.I. (2015). Assessing attitudes towards animal assisted therapy among students and faculty in American Psychological Association accredited programs. Human-Animal Interaction Bulletin, 3, 11–27.
-
Trembath, F. (2014). Practitioner attitudes and beliefs regarding the role animals play in human health. HABRI Central Briefs, 1–7. https://habricentral.org/.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 323 | 257 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 79 | 76 | 1 |
Attitudes and Intentions Regarding Animal-Assisted Interventions: Associated Variables Among Southern Spanish Psychologists
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Javier López-Cepero Borrego in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lidia Catalina Navarro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joaquín Ruiz Estrada in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This study examined acceptance of animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) among Spanish psychologists (N = 332; mostly women). Participants reported attachment to animals, empathy, anthropomorphism, attitudes toward AAI, AAI knowledge, and intention to use AAI. Although less than 20% had AAI training, over 85% of participants were interested in using AAIs. Considering companion animals as human social equivalents and having specific AAI training were associated with more positive expectations of AAI, while personal distress was negatively associated. The variables influencing interest in developing AAI were positive attitudes, anthropomorphism, being female, and training, explaining 59% of the variance. Results showed that AAIs have high acceptance among psychology professionals, but interest in implementation was stronger when participants had positive attitudes toward AAI, showed high levels of anthropomorphism, and were female, rather than as a result of AAI training. Representing and publicizing AAIs as evidence-based treatments is important to enhance professional growth in the field.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 323 | 257 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 79 | 76 | 1 |