The Netherlands and the Gülen movement

in Sociology of Islam
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The Gülen movement has been active among immigrant workers from Turkey in the Netherlands since the 1980s. Its first institutions—educational centers, boarding houses, schools, business associations—were established when a (partly) Dutch-educated second generation came to adulthood in the mid-1990s. Ağabeyler (“older brothers”) dispatched from Turkey remained in the background, while students and graduates of Dutch universities and colleges built up support networks in Dutch civil society and municipal administrations, finding official endorsement as well as subsidies for some of their initiatives. They encountered increasing opposition from a coalition of Kemalist and former leftist Turks and anti-Muslim Dutch politicians and journalists, reflecting changing attitudes towards Islam in Dutch popular discourse as well as power struggles in Turkey. Activities that had previously been praised and supported by Dutch counterparts, such as homework assistance centers, dormitories, and (secular) schools came under suspicion when public opinion was alerted that these were the initiatives of a non-transparent Muslim piety movement. In response to negative publicity that accused these schools of brainwashing and Islamic indoctrination, and to prove that it made positive contributions to social integration, the movement closed its dormitories for secondary school students. This was followed by intensified efforts to show success in secular ventures. The result turned the Gülen movement into arguably the most successfully integrated immigrant-based organization in the country.

The Netherlands and the Gülen movement

in Sociology of Islam



  • AvcıHanefi (2010). Haliç’te yaşayan Simonlar: Dün devlet bugün cemaat [Simons living in the Golden Horn district: yesterday the state today the (Gülen) Congregation]. Ankara: Angora.

  • BruinessenMartin van (2006). After van Gogh: roots of anti-Muslim rage paper presented at the Seventh Mediterranean Social and Political Research Meeting Montecatini Terme 22-26 March 2006. Online at:

  • ——. (2011). Producing Islamic knowledge in Western Europe: discipline, authority, and personal quest. In: Bruinessen Martin van and Stefano Allievi (eds) Producing Islamic knowledge: transmission and dissemination in Western Europe pp. 127. Oxon: Routledge.

  • CanatanKadir (2001). Turkse islam: perspectieven op organisatievorming en leiderschap in Nederland [Turkish Islam: perspectives on organization and leadership in the Netherlands]. [Unpublished PhD Thesis]: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.

  • CanatanKadirOudijkC.H. and LjamaiAbdelilah (2003). De maatschappelijke rol van de Rotterdamse moskeeën [The social role of Rotterdam’s mosques]. Rotterdam: Centrum voor Onderzoek en Statistiek.

  • EntzingerHan (2003). The rise and fall of multiculturalism: the case of the Netherlands. In: JoppkeChristian and EwaMorawska (eds) Toward assimilation and citizenship: immigrants in liberal nation-states pp. 5986. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • FähmelAnita (2009). Dossier Fethullah Gülen. Een verkennend onderzoek naar de Fethullah Gülen organisatie en haar invloed in Rotterdam [The Fethullah Gülen file: an exploratory investigation of the Fethullah Gülen organization and its influence in Rotterdam]. Rotterdam: Leefbaar Rotterdam. Online at:

  • HendrickJoshua D. (2013). Gülen: the ambiguous politics of market Islam in Turkey and the world. New York: New York University Press.

  • Human Rights Agenda Association (2010). Ergenekon is our reality. Ankara: Rights Agenda AssociationHuman. Online at:

  • JenkinsGareth H. (2009). Between fact and fantasy: Turkey's Ergenekon investigation. Silk Road Paper Washington DC: Central Asia - Caucasus Institute. Online at:

  • LandmanNico (1992). Van mat tot minaret: de institutionalisering van de islam in Nederland [From prayer rug to minaret: the institutionalization of Islam in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.

  • NOVA (2008). Turkse beweging fundamentale (sic!) sekte? [Turkish movement a fundamentalist sect?] TV broadcast July 4 2008. Archived at:

  • KortewegAnna (2005). De moord op Theo van Gogh: gender, religie en de strijd over de integratie van migranten in Nederland [The murder of Theo van Gogh: gender, religion and the struggle over the integration of migrants in the Netherlands]Migrantenstudies 21(4): 20523.

  • PrinsBaukje (2004). Voorbij de onschuld: het debat over integratie in Nederland [Beyond innocence: the debate on integration in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.

  • RathJanSunierThijl and MeyerAstrid (1997). Islam in the Netherlands: the establishment of Islamic institutions in a de-pillarizing societyTijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 88(4): 38995.

  • ŞıkAhmet (2011). İmamın ordusu [The Imam’s army] unpublished but widely available online. Later published as kitap: "dokunan yanar" [book: whoever touches on them gets burned]. Istanbul: Postacı Yayınları.

  • TuramBerna (2007). Between Islam and the state: the politics of engagement. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • YavuzM. Hakan (2003). The Gülen movement: the Turkish Puritans. In: YavuzM. Hakan and John LEsposito (eds) Turkish Islam and the secular state: the Gülen movement pp. 1947. New York: Syracuse University Press.

  • —— (2013). Toward an Islamic enlightenment: the Gülen movement Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • YükleyenAhmet (2011). Localizing Islam in Europe: Turkish Islamic communities in Germany and the Netherlands. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

  • 1

    In 1998the leading daily Volkskrant had published a long and praising article on the boarding house and educational center Beatitas in Utrecht citing a Dutch school coordinator on the positive impact of the center on the pupils’ attitudes (Volkskrant 12 September 1998). A decade later the political climate in the Netherlands had changed dramatically; immigrants and Muslims no longer could count on much goodwill and the fact that the educational center was associated with a Muslim movement had become a reason for suspicion. See for instance an alarmist report in the daily Trouw of December 15 2010 and the subsequent series of further “revelations” on the weblog which appears dedicated to the “unmasking” of Gülen supporters and their activities. The most recent affair began with a report in the television news show Nieuwsuur on April 5 2013 which “revealed” that a number of schoolchildren in Amsterdam lived in student apartments (ıșık eveleri/dershane) owned by a Gülen-affiliated foundation (

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 71 71 4
Full Text Views 190 190 3
PDF Downloads 21 21 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0