Few concepts if any are more central to Shiite Sufism (as to Shiism generally) than valāyat, and the current essay briefly explores its significance in and around an Iranian treatise of the early twentieth-century named the Valāyat-nāme. Three perspectives frame the discussion: the modern theory of friendship generally, Christian mystical and Islamic concepts of Friendship with God, and (Sunni and) Shiite Sufi authority. It is proposed that typical Islamic formulations of Friendship with God are particularised from their mentioned Christian and secular counterparts by the Friend’s conception as an initiatory patron, which provides a basis to Sufi authority. Given that Sufi claims to patronage remain contested in Shiite spheres, where legitimacy is predicated on subordination to the Imamate, ambiguous articulations of hierarchy are crucial to understanding Shiite Sufi authority. The Valāyat-nāme read thus sheds light on the downfall of its author, the Sufi master Solṭānᶜalīshāh (d.1909). The latter’s projection of spiritual authority unravelled on interrelated religious, economic and political grounds, in the context of the Constitutional Revolution in early twentieth-century provincial Khorasan.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
“Gottesfreunde ”. (1997). In The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. ed. Cross F.L., & Livingstone E.A.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 695.
Affifi A.E. (1979 [1939]). The Mystical Philosophy of Muhyid Din-Ibnul Arabi. Lahore: Sh. Muhammad Ashraf.
Algar Hamid. (1995). Niᶜmat-Allāhiyya. In Encyclopaedia of Islam ii. 8, Leiden: Brill, 44–48.
Amanat A. (2011 [1986]). Āqāsī. In Encyclopaedia Iranica. 2, Fasc. 2, London, 183–88.
Amir-Moezzi Mohammad Ali. (2002). Notes À Propos De La Walāya Imamite (Aspects De L’Imamologie Duodécimaine, X). Journal of the American Oriental Society, 122(4): 722–41.
Āmolī Sayyed Ḥeydar, . (1969 [#752Q/1351]). Kitāb-i jāmiᶜ al-asrār wa manbaᶜ al-anwār. Corbin H., & Yahia O. (eds.). Tehran/Paris: Département d’iranologie de l’Institut franco-iranien de Recherche/Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient Adrien-Maisonneuve.
Antes Peter. (1971). Zur Theologie der Schiᶜa. Eine Untersuchung des Ğamiᶜ al-asrār wa manbaᶜ al-anwār von Sayyid Ḥaidar Āmolī. Freiburg im Breisgau: Klaus Schwarz Verlag.
Bell Sandra, & Coleman Simon, . (1999). The Anthropology of Friendship: Enduring Themes and Future Possibilities. In Bell S., & Coleman S. (eds.), The Anthropology of Friendship, pp. 1-19. Oxford: Berg Publishers Ltd.
Borqeᶜī, Aboᵓl-Fażl ᶜAllāma (Seyyed Aboᵓl-Fażl ᶜAllāme Borqeᶜī). (?). Ḥaqīqat ol-ᶜerfān, yā: taftīsh dar shenāsāᵓī-ye ᶜāref va ṣūfī va shāᶜer va ḥakīm va darvīsh. Tehran.
Calmard Jean. (2004). Moḥammad Shah Qājār. In Encyclopaedia Iranica. Online Edition, New York.
Chodkiewicz Michel. (1986). Le Sceau des Saints. Prophétie et Sainteté dans la Doctrine d’Ibn Arabî. Paris: Gallimard.
Corbin Henry. (1972). En Islam iranien. Aspects spirituels et philosophiques (4. L’école d’Ispahan. L’école shaykhie. Le douzième imâm). Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
———. (1972b). En Islam iranien. Aspects spirituels et philosophiques (3. Les fidèles d’amour. Shî’isme et Soufisme). Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
———. (1971). En Islam iranien. Aspects spirituels et philosophiques (1. Le Shi’isme duodécimain). Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
Corin Ellen E., (1995). Meaning Games at the Margins: The cultural centrality of subordinated structures. In Bibeau G., & Corin E.E. (eds.), Beyond Textuality. Asceticism and violence in anthropological interpretation, pp. 173–92. Approaches to Semiotics Series. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cornell Vincent J. (1998). Realm of the Saint. Power and Authority in Moroccan Sufism. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Montaigne De, Michel. (1933 [1580–1595]). Essais. [Bibliothèque de la Pléiade]. Texte établi et annoté par Albert Thibaudet (ed.). Argenteuil: Coulouma.
Dumont Louis. ((1966) 1980). Homo Hierarchicus. The Caste System and Its Implications. Complete revised English ed. Chicago [etc.]: University of Chicago Press.
Giddens Anthony. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gonābādī, Solṭānmoḥammad (Mollā Solṭānmoḥammad Gonābādī, ›Solṭānᶜalīshāh‹). (1384/2005–6 [1323Q/1905–6]). Valāyat-nāme. 5th. Tehran: Ḥaqīqat.
——— ( Mollā Solṭānmoḥammad Gonābādī, ›Solṭānᶜalīshāh‹). (1384/2006 [1317Q/1899]). Majmaᶜ os-Saᶜādāt. 3rd. Tehran: Ḥaqīqat.
——— ( Mollā Solṭānmoḥammad Gonābādī, ›Solṭānᶜalīshāh‹). (1344/1965-6 [1314Q/1896-7]). Bayān al-Saᶜāda fī maqāmāt al-ᶜibāda. Tehran: Maṭbaᶜe-ye Dāneshgāh-e Tehrān.
——— ( Mollā Solṭānmoḥammad Gonābādī, ›Solṭānᶜalīshāh‹). (1379/2000-1 [1308Q/1891-2]). Saᶜādat-nāme. Tehran: Ḥaqīqat.
Gramlich Richard. (1989). Das Sendschreiben al-Qušayrīs über das Sufitum. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
———. (1976). Die schiitischen Derwischorden Persiens (2. Glaube und Lehre). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
———. (1965). Die schiitischen Derwischorden Persiens (1. Die Affiliationen). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Hairi Abdul-Hadi. (1977). Shī’īsm and Constitutionalism in Iran. A Study of the Role Played by the Persian Residents of Iraq in Iranian Politics. Leiden: Brill.
Hojvīrī, ᶜAlī ibn ᶜOs̱mān al-~ al-Jollābī. (1371/1992). Kashf ol-maḥjūb. 2nd. V. Shukovsky (with an introduction by Dr Qāsem Anṣārī) (ed.). Tehran: Ketābkhāne-ye Tahūrī.
Īzad-Goshasb, Asadollāh (Sheikh Asadollāh Golpāyegānī Īzad-Goshasb, ›Nāṣerᶜalī‹). (1362/1983). Resāle-ye javābīya. http://www.sufi.ir/books/download/farsi/javabeeyeh.pdf (accessed 20 June 2013). Tehran: Khvāja.
Jaẕbī-Eṣfahānī H. (1372/1993). Bāb-e velāyat va rāh-e hedāyat. Tehran: Mohandes Sayyed ᶜAlīreżā Jaẕbī.
Kohlberg E. (2011 [1989]). Āmolī, Sayyed Bahāᵓ-Al-Dīn. In Encyclopaedia Iranica. 1, Fasc. 9, London, 983–85.
Landolt Hermann. (2000). Ḥaydar-i Āmulī et les deux miᶜrājs. Studia Islamica, 91(91): 91–106.
———. (1987). Walāyah. In The Encyclopedia of Religion. ed. Eliade M., New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 613–23.
Lindholm Charles, . (1998). Prophets and Pirs. In Werbner P., & Basu H. (eds.), Embodying Charisma. Modernity, locality and the performance of emotion in Sufi cults, pp. 209–33. New York: Routledge.
Madanī Moḥammad. (1381/2002 [1376/1997]). Dar khānaqāh-e Beydokht che mī-goẕarad? 2nd. Tehran: Author.
McGregor Richard. (2001). The Development of the Islamic Understanding of Sanctity. Religious Studies and Theology, 20(1): 51–79.
Miller, Wm. McE. (1923). Shiᶜah Mysticism. The Sufis of Gunābād. The Moslem World, 13: 343–63.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. (1972). Shiᶜism and Sufism: their Relationship in Essence and in History. Sufi essays, pp. 104–20. London: G. Allen and Unwin.
Nicholson Reynold A. (2002 [1914]). The Mystics of Islam. Bloomington: World Wisdom.
Pāzūkī Shahrām (ed.) (1387/2008–9). Do resāle dar zendegī va shahādat-e Solṭānᶜalīshāh. [Mollā ᶜAlī Nurᶜalī Gonābādī, Rojūm osh-shayāteyn; Keyvān Qazvīnī, Shahīdīye va żamīme-ye ān]. Tehran: Ḥaqīqat.
Post R.R. (1968). The Modern Devotion. Confrontation with Reformation and Humanism. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Pourjavady Nasrollah, & Wilson Peter Lamborn. (1978). Kings of Love. The Poetry and History of the Niᶜmatullāhī Sufi Order. Tehran: Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy.
Radtke Bernd. (2000). Walī [General Survey]. In Encyclopaedia of Islam ii. [10], Leiden: Brill, 109–12.
———. (1994). Tirmiḏiana Minora. Oriens, 34: 242–98.
Radtke Bernd, & O’Kane John. (1996). The Concept of Sainthood in Early Islamic Mysticism: Two works by al-Ḥakīm al-Tirmidhī. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
Rapp Francis, . (1994). Die Gottesfreunde am Oberrhein. In Thurnher E. (ed.), Das Elsaß und Tirol an der Wende vom Mittelalter zur Neuzeit. Sieben Vorträge, pp. 55–62. Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag Wagner.
Ridgeon Lloyd V.J. (1998). ᶜAzīz Nasafī. Richmond: Curzon.
Silver Allan. (1989). Friendship and Trust as Moral Ideals. An Historical Approach. European Journal of Sociology, 30(2): 274–97.
›Solṭānᶜalīshāh‹ ——— see under Gonābādī.
Tābande Solṭānḥoseyn (Ḥāj Solṭānḥoseyn Tābande Gonābādī, ›Reżāᶜalīshāh‹). (1384/2006). Nābeghe-ye ᶜelm va ᶜerfān. 3rd. Tehran: Ḥaqīqat.
Trimingham J. Spencer. (1971). The Sufi Orders in Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van den Bos Matthijs. (2002). Mystic Regimes. Sufism and the State in Iran, from the late Qajar era to the Islamic Republic. [Social, economic and political studies of the Middle East and Asia/83]. Leiden: Brill.
van Engen John (ed.) (1988). Devotio Moderna. Basic Writings. New York: Paulist Press.
van Engen John H. (2008). Sisters and Brothers of the Common Life. The Devotio Moderna and the World of the Later Middle Ages. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
van Ruusbroec, Jan. (1981). Opera Omnia. D.G. de Baere (ed.), (trans.) P. Crowley & D.H. Rolfson (1. Boecsken Der Verclaringhe). Tielt/Leiden: Lanoo/Brill.
Verdeyen Paul. (c1994). Ruusbroec and his mysticism (trans.) A. Lefevere. Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press.
Walker P.E. (2002). Wilāya [2. inShīᶜism]. In Encyclopaedia of Islam ii. [11], Leiden: Brill, 208–09.
Warnar Geert, . (2010). Tauler’s Minnenclich Meister. Charisma and authority in the vernacular mystical tradition of the Low Countries and the Rhineland. In Jansen K.L., & Rubin M. (eds.), Charisma and Religious Authority. Jewish, Christian, and Muslim preaching, 1200–1500, pp. 49–70. Turnhout: Brepols.
Webster Helen. (2007). Tauler and Merswin. Friends in God? Oxford German Studies, 36(2): 212–26.
Zarrīnkūb— Zarrinkoob A.H. (1970). Persian Sufism in Its Historical Perspective. Iranian Studies, 3(3/4): 139–220.
———. (1369/1990). Donbāle-ye jostejū, dar taṣavvof-e Īrān. Tehran: Amīr Kabīr.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1182 | 129 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 175 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 42 | 6 | 0 |
Few concepts if any are more central to Shiite Sufism (as to Shiism generally) than valāyat, and the current essay briefly explores its significance in and around an Iranian treatise of the early twentieth-century named the Valāyat-nāme. Three perspectives frame the discussion: the modern theory of friendship generally, Christian mystical and Islamic concepts of Friendship with God, and (Sunni and) Shiite Sufi authority. It is proposed that typical Islamic formulations of Friendship with God are particularised from their mentioned Christian and secular counterparts by the Friend’s conception as an initiatory patron, which provides a basis to Sufi authority. Given that Sufi claims to patronage remain contested in Shiite spheres, where legitimacy is predicated on subordination to the Imamate, ambiguous articulations of hierarchy are crucial to understanding Shiite Sufi authority. The Valāyat-nāme read thus sheds light on the downfall of its author, the Sufi master Solṭānᶜalīshāh (d.1909). The latter’s projection of spiritual authority unravelled on interrelated religious, economic and political grounds, in the context of the Constitutional Revolution in early twentieth-century provincial Khorasan.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1182 | 129 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 175 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 42 | 6 | 0 |