Turkey has been going through a major urban transformation for the past decade as a result of the vigorous urban policy of the akp government. Luxury real estate projects, from gated communities to office towers and shopping malls are mushrooming every day to replace parks, forests, historical sites, beaches, and other shared space. This urban policy has been largely accepted by capitalist groups who prioritized economic growth. Yet, it was criticized by left-wing and environmentalist circles who problematized the displacement of the urban poor, elimination of diversity, and the decline of urban nature as a result. Nevertheless, a critical aspect of this urban renewal policy, namely the dramatic expansion of the boundaries and control of the government at the expense of rival institutions and actors received little attention. This analysis focuses on the akp government’s legislative interventions that affected the schemes of urban development. The study considers how this urban policy combined capitalist strategies with political centralization, which allowed solidification of government control.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adaman Fikret , , Akarçay Ayça , Kıvanç Karaman (2013). The Political Economy of Turkey. (mimeo).
Balaban Osman (2011). Inşaat Sektörü Neyin Lokomotifi? (Whose Engine is the Construction Sector?) Birikim, 270: 19–26.
Bartu-Candan Ayfer , and Kolluoğlu Biray (2008). Emerging Spaces of Neoliberalism: A Gated Town and a Public Housing Project in Istanbul. New Perspectives on Turkey, 39: 5–46.
Benjaminsen Tor , , Mara Goldman , , Maya Minwary , , and Faustin Maganga (2013). Wildlife Management in Tanzania: State Control, Rent Seeking and Community Resistance. Development and Change, 44 (5): 1087–1109.
Brenner Neil (2004). New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, Oxord: Oxford University Press.
——— (2001). State theory in the political conjuncture: Henri Lefebvre’s “Comments on a new state form. Antipode, 33 (5): 783–808.
Buğra Ayşe , and Savaşkan Osman (2012). Politics and Class: Turkish Business Environment in the Neoliberal Age. New Perspectives on Turkey, 46: 27–63.
Cao Albert (2009). Developmental State, Property-led Growth, and Property Investment Risks in China. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 27(2): 162–179.
Curtis Thomas B. , and Westerfield Donald L. (1992). Congressional Intent, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing.
Çarkoğlu Ali (2015). Haziran 2015 Seçimlerine Giderken (Towards the June 2015 Elections), url: http://t24.com.tr/files/20150506015156_20150505232435_ali-carkoglu-2015-secim-arastirmasi-sunum-4.pdf.
Çavuşoğlu Erbatur (2011). İslamcı Neoliberalizmde İnşaat Fetişi ve Mülkiyet Üzerine Simgesel Hale (The Symbolic Halo above the Construction Fetish and Ownership in Islamic Neoliberalism). Birikim, 270: 40–51.
Denis Eric , (2006). Cairo as Neoliberal Capital? From Walled City to Gated Communities. In Singerman D. , and Amar P. (eds) Cairo Cosmopolitan, 47–71. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.
Demiralp Seda (2009). The Rise of Islamic Capital and the Decline of Islamic Radicalism in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 41(3): 315–336.
Dombey Daniel (2013). Turkey Scraps $5.7bn Privatisation. The Financial Times, 24 February 2013, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f6eec15a-7e69-11e2-a792-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3WF7ZosEN (accessed 1 April 2015).
Cornell Svante (2013). Erdogan versus Koç Holding: Turkey’s New Witch Hunt. Turkey Analyst, 6 (18), 9 October 2013. http://www.turkeyanalyst.org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/item/64-erdogan-vs-ko%C3%A7-holding-turkeys-new-witch-hunt.html (accessed 1 April 2015).
Geniş Şerife (2007). Producing Elite Localities: The Rise of Gated Communities in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 44(4): 771–798.
Ghosh Parishit , and Ghatak Maitreesh (2011). The Land Acquisition Bill: A Critique and a Proposal. Economic & Political Weekly, xlvı (41): 65–72.
Gülhan Sinan (2011). Devlet Müteahhitlerinden Gayrımenkul Geliştiricilerine, Türkiye’de Kentsel Rant ve Bir Meta Olarak Konut Üreticiliği: Konuta Hücum (From State Contractors to Real Estate Developers, Land Rents and Housing Production as a Commodity in Turkey: Surge in Housing). Birikim, 270: 27–33.
Harvey David (2008). The Right to the City. New Left Review, 53: 23–40.
News Hürriyet Daily (2013). Turkish Authority Cancels Koç Holding’s National Warship Contract. 22 September 2013. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-authority-cancels-koc-holdings-national-warship-contract-.aspx?pageID=238&nID=55244&NewsCatID=345 (accessed 1 April 2015).
Işık Aslı (2012). Kamunun Yaptığı Her 100 İhaleden Sadece 4’ünü ki̇k İnceliyor (Only 4 out of 100 procurements are supervised by the ppl ). Akşam, 9 December 2012. http://www.aksam.com.tr/guncel/kamunun-yaptigi-her-ihaleden-sadece-4unu-kik-inceliyor--153240h/haber-153240 (accessed 1 January 2015).
Karaman Ozan (2013). Urban Neoliberalism with Islamic Characteristics. Urban Studies, 50 (16): 3412–3427.
——— (2008). Urban Pulse-(Re)Making Space for Globalization in Istanbul. Urban Geography, 29(6): 518–525.
Keyder Çağlar (2005). Globalization and social exclusion in Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1): 124–34.
Kuyucu Tuna , and Ünsal Özlem (2010). Urban Renewal in Istanbul ‘Urban Transformation’ as State-led Property Transfer: An Analysis of Two Cases of Urban Renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 47(7): 1479–1499.
Lee Ching Kwan (2008). Rights Activism in China. Contexts, 7(3): 14–19.
Lefebvre Henry (2001). Comments on a New State Form. Antipode, 33(5): 769–782.
Lefebvre Henry , (1996, originally 1968). Le Droit à la Ville. In Kofman E. , and Lebas E. (eds and translators) Writings on Cities, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
MacKuen Michael , , Erikson Robert S. , and Stimson James A. (1992). Economic growth & reelection: Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the u.s. Economy. The American Political Science Review, 86(3): 597–611.
Mitchell Tim (2002). Rule of Experts: Egypt, Technopolitics, Modernity, California: University of California Press.
Orueta Fernando , and Fainstein Susan (2008). The New Mega-Projects: Genesis and Impacts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4): 759–767.
Öniş Ziya (2011). Power, Interests and Coalitions: The Political Economy of Mass Privatisation in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 32(4): 707–724.
——— (2012) The Triumph of Conservative Globalism: The Political Economy of the akp Era. Turkish Studies, 13(2): 135–152.
Penpecioğlu Mehmet (2011). Kapitalist Kentleşme Dinamiklerinin Türkiye’deki Son 10 Yılı: Yapılı Çevre Üretimi, Devlet ve Büyük Ölçekli Kentsel Projeler (Last Ten Years of Capitalist Urbanization Dynamics in Turkey: Production of Built Environment, State and the Large Scale Urban Projects). Birikim, 270: 62–73.
Purcell Mark (2003). Citizenship and the Right to the Global City: Reimagining the Capitalist World Order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3): 564–590.
Rueschemeyer Dietrich , , Stephens Evelyn H. , , and Stephens John D. (1992). Capitalist Development & Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith Neil (1996). The New Urban Frontier, London: Routledge.
Turan Menaf (2009). Türkiye’de Kentsel Rant, Ankara: Tan Kitabevi Yayınları.
Waterbury John (1992). Export-Led Growth and the Center-Right Coalition in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 24(2): 127–145.
Weyland Kurt (1999). Neoliberal Populism in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 31(4): 379–401.
White Jenny (1997). Political Islam and Welfare (Refah) Party in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 30(1): 63–82.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 696 | 82 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 274 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 79 | 6 | 0 |
Turkey has been going through a major urban transformation for the past decade as a result of the vigorous urban policy of the akp government. Luxury real estate projects, from gated communities to office towers and shopping malls are mushrooming every day to replace parks, forests, historical sites, beaches, and other shared space. This urban policy has been largely accepted by capitalist groups who prioritized economic growth. Yet, it was criticized by left-wing and environmentalist circles who problematized the displacement of the urban poor, elimination of diversity, and the decline of urban nature as a result. Nevertheless, a critical aspect of this urban renewal policy, namely the dramatic expansion of the boundaries and control of the government at the expense of rival institutions and actors received little attention. This analysis focuses on the akp government’s legislative interventions that affected the schemes of urban development. The study considers how this urban policy combined capitalist strategies with political centralization, which allowed solidification of government control.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 696 | 82 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 274 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 79 | 6 | 0 |