This article explores the on-going construction, or “sedimentation,” of Sunni orthodoxy by paying attention to the boundary role of “insider-Others.” To highlight how boundary positions of heretical communities shape the category of orthodox Islam, this paper focuses on the social processes excluding the “heretical” Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in South Africa. The paper undertakes a qualitative analysis of two Supreme Court cases involving Ahmadis and the Muslim Judicial Council of South Africa, local representatives of orthodox Sunnism. These two cases stand out in a contentious history that has led to extreme ostracism of Ahmadis by Sunni Muslims in the country. The analysis identifies three features of Sunni orthodoxy that crystallized in the process of conflict with the Ahmadiyya: alienation, transnationalism, and Archimedean moral authority. These features help make sense of social processes marginalizing Ahmadis around the world, and offer new insights into construction of global Sunni orthodoxy.
Ahmadiyya Anjuman Ishaat Islam Lahore (sa) & Ismail Peck vs The Muslim Judicial Council & others, No. 10058/82 (Supreme Court of South Africa, Cape of Good Hope Division, Justice Williamson 1985).
ai (2007). Saudi Arabia: Amnesty International calls for end to arrests and expulsions of foreign migrant workers on discriminatory grounds. Religious Persecution of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, ai Index: mde 23/001/2007. Retrieved from The Persecution.org website: http://www.thepersecution.org/ai/aius070117sa.html.
al-Azmeh, Aziz (2007). The Times of History: Universal Topics in Islamic Historiography. Budapest: Central European University Press.
GillespiePiers (2007). Current issues in Indonesian Islam: Analysing the 2005 Council of Indonesian Ulama Fatwa No. 7 opposing pluralism, liberalism and secularism. Journal of Islamic Studies, 18(2): 202–240.
KhanAbid. (2008, March 24). Saudi persecution of Ahmadiyya Muslim community continues, Press release, International Press and Media Desk. Retrieved from http://www.thepersecution.org/press/08/sp080324.html.
Sh. Mogamat Abbas Jassiem vs Sh. Nazim Mohamed and the Muslim Judicial Council, No. 1434, 1438/86 (Supreme Court of South Africa, Justice van den Heever 1990).
Sheikh Nazim Mohamed and the Muslim Judicial Council vs Sheikh Mogamat Abbas Jassiem, No. 201/1992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa, Justices Hoexter, Smalberger, Steyn, Marais and Schutz 1995).
Siddiq, Muhammad Nadeem Ahmad (1995). Enforced apostasy: Zaheeruddin v. State and the official persecution of the Ahmadiyya community in Pakistan. Law & Inequality, 14: 275–338.
YusufHuma (2012, December 6). Minorities Report, International Herald Tribune. Retrieved from http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/ahmadis-a-special-target-of-discrimination-in-pakistan/.
Established in1945, the mjc was not the only representative Islamic body in the country. Over time the influence of other bodies – such as the Islamic Council of South Africa – dissipated. By 1990 the mjc was the largest organization representing Muslims and their interest in South Africa. In 2014, mjc controlled over 80% of the approximately 170 mosques in the Western Cape.