Save

The Convergence of Migrants and Refugees

Western and Muslim Perspectives

In: Sociology of Islam
Authors:
Ray Jureidini Professor of Migration Ethics and Human Rights, Research Center for Islamic Legislation and Ethics, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, ray.jureidini@gmail.com

Search for other papers by Ray Jureidini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Latife Reda Department of Social Sciences, Lebanese American University, latife.reda@gmail.com

Search for other papers by Latife Reda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The paper addresses the migrant-refugee debate in relation to recent refugee flows from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq and other countries gaining unauthorized entry into Europe. This is compared with the accusations (and denials) that the wealthy countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (gcc) states have not accepted any refugees from Syria in particular. It is argued that the definition of migrants and refugees is problematic in that they often converge with respect to livelihood needs and rights. Current provisions should adapt to contemporary circumstances as in the current refugee ‘crisis’ and perhaps more regard by Muslim states in the use of Islamic ethical principles applicable to the treatment of migrants and refugees. In this sense, there is a serendipitous convergence of recent arguments about refugee livelihood requirements and practices of Muslim countries such as the gcc. The primary difference is that for refugees, resettlement is assumed to be permanent, while the gcc states only offer temporary residence status.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 546 148 17
Full Text Views 290 14 1
PDF Views & Downloads 119 19 3