This article examines the authority of the Sufi shaykh, which it divides between the esoteric and the exoteric (which includes the social implications of esoteric authority) and analyses with help from Weber. In principle Sufi shaykhs are among the most important leaders of the Sunni faithful. In practice, however, the Sufi shaykh now has much less power and authority than might be expected. This is partly because modern states have, in general, reduced the power of Sufi shaykhs, and because decline in the power of the ʿulamaʾ has included the decline of the power of Sufi shaykhs who are also ʿulamaʾ. It is also because there is an inverse relationship between the power of the shaykh and the size of his ṭarīqa (order). The most powerful shaykh is the one with primarily charismatic authority, but his ṭarīqa will be small. The largest ṭarīqa is led by a shaykh whose authority depends on tradition and heredity; his power is not so great. This paradox is not changed by the availability, for political reasons, of new sources of state support for the leadership role of Sufi shaykhs as an alternative to Salafi and ikhwāni Islam.
BangAnne K. (1996). The Idrisi State in ʿAsir 1906–1934: Politics Religion and Personal Prestige as Statebuilding Factors in Early Twentieth-Century Arabia. Bergen: Centre for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies.
BöttcherAnnabelle (2006). “Religious Authority in Transnational Sufi Networks: Shaykh Nazim al-Qubrusi al-Haqqani al-Naqshbandi.” In KrämerGudrun and SchmidtkeSabine (ed.) Speaking for Islam: Religious Authorities in Muslim Societies. Leiden: Brill.
CornellSvante E. and KayaM.K. (2015). “The Naqshbandi-Khalidi Order and Political Islam in Turkey.” Hudson InstituteSeptember 3.https://hudson.org/research/11601-the-naqshbandi-khalidi-order-and-political-islam-in-turkey.
GaborieauMarc (2010). “The Redefinition of Religious Authority among South Asian Muslims from 1916 to 1956.” In AzraAzyumardivan DijkKees and KapteinNico J.G. (ed.) Varieties of Religious Authority: Changes and Challenges in 20th Century Indonesian Islam pp. 1–16. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
HenkelHeiko (2009). “One Foot Rooted in Islam, the Other Foot Circling the World: Tradition and Engagement in a Turkish Sufi cemaat.” In RaudvereCatharina and StenbergLeif (ed.) Sufism Today: Heritage and Tradition in the Global Community pp. 103–116. London: I.B. Tauris 2009.
KrämerGudrun and SchmidtkeSabine “Introduction: Religious Authority and Religious Authorities in Muslim Societies: A Critical Overview.” In KrämerGudrun and SchmidtkeSabine (ed.) Speaking for Islam: Religious Authorities in Muslim Societies. Leiden: Brill.
ÖzdalgaElizabeth (2010). “Transformation of Sufi-Based Communities in Modern Turkey: The Nakşibendis, the Nurcus, and the Gülen Community.” In KerslakeCeliaÖktemKerem and RobinsPhilip (ed.) Turkey’s Engagement with Modernity: Conflict and Change in the Twentieth Century pp. 1–14. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
SedgwickMark (2004a). “Establishments and Sects in the Islamic World.” In LucasPhillip and RobbinsThomas (ed.) New Religious Movements in the 21st Century: Legal Political and Social Challenges in Global Perspective pp. 283–312. New York: Routledge.
SedgwickMark (2004b). “In Search of the Counter-Reformation: Anti-Sufi Stereotypes and the Budshishiyya’s Response.” In KurzmanCharles and BrowersMichaelle (ed.) An Islamic Reformation? pp. 125–146. Lanham MD: Lexington Books.
SedgwickMark (2016b). “The Rise of ‘Traditional Islam:’ Modern Muslim Religious Subjectivities in the Early Twenty-First Century.” Unpublished paper given at the Tenth Nordic Conference on Middle Eastern StudiesUniversity of Southern DenmarkSeptember 22–24.