From the mid-2000s, Dutch policy makers, the media, and others have started to define Muslim-only marriages as a problem. This contribution unpacks a recent hype, when a Dutch TV station broadcasted the conclusion of a polygamous marriage at a mosque, while simultaneously the largest right-wing political party presented an initiative to further criminalize Muslim-only marriages. In both the TV program and the policy initiative, the same feminist organization, Femmes for Freedom, was involved. Using liberal arguments such as freedom of partner choice to limit the freedom of a religious minority, interestingly, the dividing lines were neither between Muslims and non-Muslims, nor between more ‘mainstream’ and more ‘Salafi-oriented’ mosques. Arguing for the need to protect women, many supported the current Dutch law demanding that couples conclude a civil marriage prior to a religious marriage, as the former would protect women better, while others called for better educating Muslims about women’s rights in Islam. Whereas the voices of women in Muslim-only marriages were not heard, our research with converts entering into polygamous marriages indicates that they may opt for these marriages themselves with their main concerns centering on the equal treatment of wives and men’s openness about polygamy.
BacchiCarol (2015). The turn to problematization: Political implications of contrasting interpretive and poststructural adaptations. Open Journal of Political Science5(1): 1–12. DOI:10.4236/ojps.2015.51001.
BonjourSaskia and Betty de Hart (2013). A proper wife, a proper marriage: Constructions of “us” and “them” in Dutch family migration policy. European Journal of Women’s Studies20(1): 61–76. DOI:10.1177/1350506812456459.
BonjourSaskia and KralerAlbert (2014). Introduction: Family migration as an integration issue? Policy perspectives and academic insights. Journal of Family Issues36(11): 1407–1432. DOI:10.1177/0192513x14557490.
BonjourSaskia and Willem DuyvendakJan (2017). The “migrant with poor prospects”: Racialized intersections of class and culture in Dutch civic integration debates. Ethnic and Racial Studies1–19. DOI:10.1080/01419870.2017.1339897.
De KoningMartijn (2012). The “other” political Islam: Understanding salafi politics. In BoubekeurAmal and RoyOlivier (eds.) Whatever happened to the Islamists?: Salafis heavy metal Muslims and the lure of consumerist Islam pp. 153–176. New York/London: Columbia University Press/Hurst Publishers.
KoningDeMartijn de, Oka Storms, and Edien Bartels (2014). Legal “ban” on transnational cousin-marriages; citizen debate in the Netherlands. Transnational Social Review: A Social Work Journal4(2–3): 226–241. DOI:10.1080/21931674.2014.964048.
MoorsAnnelies and Vroon-NajemVanessa (forthcoming). Converts, marriage, and the Dutch nation-state: Contestations about Muslim women’s well-being. In TiilikainenMarjaAl-SharmaniMulki and MustasaariSanna (eds.) Wellbeing of transnational Muslim families: Marriage law and gender. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
StolerAnn (1992). Sexual affronts and racial frontiers: European identities and the cultural politics of exclusion in colonial Southeast Asia. Comparative Studies in Society and History34(3): 514–551. DOI:10.1017/s001041750001793x.
SunierThijl Heleen van der Linden and Ellen van de Bovenkamp (2016). The long arm of the state? Transnationalism, Islam, and nation-building: The case of Turkey and Morocco. Contemporary Islam 1–20. The Netherlands: Springer.
Van der Leun Joanne and Avelon Leupen (2009). Informele huwelijken in Nederland: in het echt verbonden? Een kritische reflectie op een vermeend veiligheidsrisico. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie55(2): 191–205.