Secular Rule and Islamic Ethics: Engaging with Muslim-Only Marriages in the Netherlands

in Sociology of Islam
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

From the mid-2000s, Dutch policy makers, the media, and others have started to define Muslim-only marriages as a problem. This contribution unpacks a recent hype, when a Dutch TV station broadcasted the conclusion of a polygamous marriage at a mosque, while simultaneously the largest right-wing political party presented an initiative to further criminalize Muslim-only marriages. In both the TV program and the policy initiative, the same feminist organization, Femmes for Freedom, was involved. Using liberal arguments such as freedom of partner choice to limit the freedom of a religious minority, interestingly, the dividing lines were neither between Muslims and non-Muslims, nor between more ‘mainstream’ and more ‘Salafi-oriented’ mosques. Arguing for the need to protect women, many supported the current Dutch law demanding that couples conclude a civil marriage prior to a religious marriage, as the former would protect women better, while others called for better educating Muslims about women’s rights in Islam. Whereas the voices of women in Muslim-only marriages were not heard, our research with converts entering into polygamous marriages indicates that they may opt for these marriages themselves with their main concerns centering on the equal treatment of wives and men’s openness about polygamy.

Secular Rule and Islamic Ethics: Engaging with Muslim-Only Marriages in the Netherlands

in Sociology of Islam

Sections

References

AIVD (2007). Radicale dawa in verandering de opkomst van islamitisch neoradicalisme in Nederland. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken.

AIVD (2016). Leven bij ISIS de mythe ontrafeld. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken.

Bacchi Carol (2015). The turn to problematization: Political implications of contrasting interpretive and poststructural adaptations. Open Journal of Political Science5(1): 112. DOI:10.4236/ojps.2015.51001.

Balibar E. (2007). Uprisings in the Banlieus. Constellations14(1): 4771. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2007.00422.x.

Boender Welmoet (2007). Imam in Nederland. Opvattingen over zijn religieuze rol in de samenleving. Amsterdam: AUP.

Bonjour Saskia and Betty de Hart (2013). A proper wife, a proper marriage: Constructions of “us” and “them” in Dutch family migration policy. European Journal of Women’s Studies20(1): 6176. DOI:10.1177/1350506812456459.

Bonjour Saskia and Kraler Albert (2014). Introduction: Family migration as an integration issue? Policy perspectives and academic insights. Journal of Family Issues36(11): 14071432. DOI:10.1177/0192513x14557490.

Bonjour Saskia and Willem Duyvendak Jan (2017). The “migrant with poor prospects”: Racialized intersections of class and culture in Dutch civic integration debates. Ethnic and Racial Studies 119. DOI:10.1080/01419870.2017.1339897.

De Koning Martijn (2012). The “other” political Islam: Understanding salafi politics. In Boubekeur Amal and Roy Olivier (eds.) Whatever happened to the Islamists?: Salafis heavy metal Muslims and the lure of consumerist Islam pp. 153176. New York/London: Columbia University Press/Hurst Publishers.

Koning De Martijn de, Oka Storms, and Edien Bartels (2014). Legal “ban” on transnational cousin-marriages; citizen debate in the Netherlands. Transnational Social Review: A Social Work Journal4(2–3): 226241. DOI:10.1080/21931674.2014.964048.

Geschiere Peter (2009). The perils of belonging: Autochthony citizenship and exclusion in Africa and Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gingrich Andre (2006). Neo-nationalism and the reconfiguration of Europe. Social Anthropology14(2): 195217. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2006.tb00034.x.

Mamdani Mahmood (2004). Good Muslim bad Muslim: America the Cold War and the roots of terror. New York: Three Leaves Press.

Moors Annelies (2009). The Dutch and the face veil: The politics of discomfort. Social Anthropology17(4): 392407. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2009.00084.x.

Moors Annelies and Vroon-Najem Vanessa (forthcoming). Converts, marriage, and the Dutch nation-state: Contestations about Muslim women’s well-being. In Tiilikainen Marja Al-Sharmani Mulki and Mustasaari Sanna (eds.) Wellbeing of transnational Muslim families: Marriage law and gender. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Navest Aysha Moors Annelies and Martijn de Koning (2016). Chatting about marriage with female migrants to Syria. Anthropology Today32(2): 2225. DOI:10.1111/1467-8322.12241.

NCTb Nationaal Coördinator Terrorismebestrijding (2006). Informele islamitische huwelijken. Het verschijnsel en de (veiligheids)risico’s. Den Haag: NCTb.

Okin Susan Moller (1999). Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sterckx Leen and Dagevos Jaco (2014). Huwelijksmigratie in Nederland. Achtergronden en leefsituatie van huwelijksmigranten. Den Haag: SCP.

Stolcke Verena (1995). Talking culture: New boundaries, new rhetorics of exclusion in Europe. Current Anthropology36(1): 124.

Stoler Ann (1992). Sexual affronts and racial frontiers: European identities and the cultural politics of exclusion in colonial Southeast Asia. Comparative Studies in Society and History34(3): 514551. DOI:10.1017/s001041750001793x.

Sunier Thijl Heleen van der Linden and Ellen van de Bovenkamp (2016). The long arm of the state? Transnationalism, Islam, and nation-building: The case of Turkey and Morocco. Contemporary Islam 1–20. The Netherlands: Springer.

Tebble Adam J. (2006). Exclusion for democracy. Political Theory34(4): 463487. DOI:10.1177/0090591706288519.

Van Beek M. (2017). Fatwa van Nederlandse imams tegen illegale huwelijken. Trouw 16 October 2017.

Van der Leun Joanne and Avelon Leupen (2009). Informele huwelijken in Nederland: in het echt verbonden? Een kritische reflectie op een vermeend veiligheidsrisico. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie55(2): 191205.

Vroon-Najem Vanessa (2014). Sisters in Islam. Women’s conversion and the politics of belonging: A Dutch case study [PhD dissertation University of Amsterdam].

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 49 49 29
Full Text Views 45 45 28
PDF Downloads 14 14 9
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0