Contesting the Boundaries between Civil and Religious Marriage
State and Mosque Discourse in Pluralistic Norway
In: Sociology of IslamSearch for other papers by Anja Bredal in
Current site
Google Scholar
This article discusses the relation between civil and religious marriage, at the interface between the state’s legal discourse and the discourses and practices of Norwegian mosques. A central question is what kinds of effects the governance of Islam in Norway has had in the field of marriage. Against the background of political debates on the system of marriage authorization of faith communities, the analysis draws on interviews with public officials and administrative leaders of mosques, the majority of whom are authorized to perform legal marriage. While the Norwegian state concept of marriage authorization is based on a separation of the civil act and the religious act, mosque administrators rather highlight the similarity and continuity between the two. Contrary to state concerns, though, the analysis suggests that the civil marriages have affected the religious, rather than vice versa. What is interesting is that this reasoning actually results in Norwegian marriage certificates replacing or suppressing the Islamic marriage contract, although agreements on mahr (dower) are still made more informally. Thus, our findings suggest that there has been a secularizing effect.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Lov 1969-06-13 nr 25: Lov om trudomssamfunn og ymist anna 1969 (Act relating to Religious Communities, etc. 1969). The English version retrieved from the University of Oslo http://app.uio.no/ub/ujur/oversatte-lover/data/lov-19690613-025-eng.pdf 18 June 2018. The translation is unofficial and may not be fully updated.
-
Asad Talal (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Bangstad Sindre (2011). En norsk sekularisme? In Bangstad et al. (eds.), Sekularisme med norske briller. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
-
Bangstad Sindre and Elgvin Olav (2017). Norway. In Yearbook of Muslims in Europe , Volume9. Brill.
-
Bøe Marianne (2012). Fornying og videreføring av midlertidig ekteskap i sjia-muslimske minoritets- og majoritetsposisjoner. [Renewal and continuation of temporary marriage in Shia Muslim minority and majority positions]. DIN, tidsskrift for religion og kultur 2012 (1).
-
Bøe Marianne (forthcoming 2018). Lived experiences of Norway’s regulation of mahr (the Muslim dower). Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 31(1), pp. 58–74.
-
Bowen John (2016). On British Islam: Religion, Law, and Everyday Practice in Shari’a Councils. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Bredal Anja (2005). Tackling forced marriages in the Nordic countries: Between women’s rights and immigration control. In Welchman Lynn and Sara Hossain (eds.), “Honour”—Crimes, Paradigms and Violence Against Women, pp. 332–353. London: Zed Books Ltd.
-
Bredal Anja and Vislie Camilla (2017). Familierettede tjenester i et flerkulturelt samfunn. Erfaringer fra familievernet og andre hjelpeinstanser. NOVA Rapport 5/17, Oslo: NOVA.
-
Bredal Anja and Wærstad Tone L. (2014). Gift, men ugift. Om utenomrettslige religiøse vigsler. [Married but unmarried. On unregistered religious marriage]. ISF-rapport 2014:006. Oslo: Institutt for samfunnsforskning.
-
Emblem Linda K. (2009). Samlivspraksiser blant muslimer i en norsk kontekst. Religion—Identitet—Fellesskap. [Living arrangements among Muslims in a Norwegian context. Religion—Identity—Community]. Masteroppgave i sosialantropologi ved Sosialantropologisk institutt, Oslo: University of Oslo.
-
Ferrari de Carli, Eli (2008). Religion, juss og rettigheter: Om skilsmisse, polygami og shari’a-råd. [Religion, law and rights. On divorce, polygamy and sharia councils]. Rapport 2008:005.Oslo: Institute for Social Research.
-
Furseth Inger (2017). The return of religion in the public sphere? The public role of Nordic faith communities. In Engelstad Fredrik , Larsen Håkon , Rogstad Jon , and Steen-Johnsen Kari (eds.), Institutional Change in the Public Sphere: Views on the Nordic Model, pp. 221–240. De Gruyter Open.
-
Jänterä-Jareborg Maarit (2014). On the cooperation between religious and state institutions in family matters: Nordic experiences . In Shah, Prakash, Marie-Claire Foblets, and Mathias Rohe (eds.),Family, Religion and Law: Cultural Encounters in Europe, pp. 79–101. Surrey: Ashgate.
-
Lefebvre Solange and Brodeur Patrice (eds.). (2017). Public Commissions on Cultural and Religious Diversity: Analysis, Reception and Challenges, Routledge; 1 edition (May 10, 2017).
-
Liversage Anika and Jensen Tina G. (2011). Parallelle retsopfattelser i Danmark. Et kvalitativt studie av privatretlige praksisser. [Parallel legal concepts in Denmark. A qualitative study of private law practices] København: Det nationale forskningscenter for velfærd.
-
Løvdal Lene (2008). Private international law, Muslim laws and gender equality. Kvinnerettslig skriftserie 78: 2008.
-
Ministry of Culture (2012). Forstandere i trossamfunn. Veileder [Administrative leaders of faith communities: A handbook]. Oslo https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/871d823dbc294e57bcf31d84f0c3cbae/forstandere_i_trossamfunn_v-953b_feb2012.pdf Retrieved 18 June 2018.
-
Moors Annelies (2013). Unregistered Islamic marriages: Anxieties about sexuality and Islam. In Berger Maurits (ed.), The Application of Sharia in the West, pp. 141–164. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
-
Mustasaari Sanna and Al-Sharmani Mulki (2017). Between “Official” and “Unofficial”: Discourses and Practices of Muslim Marriages Conclusion in Finland. Unpublished paper at the symposium Unregistered Muslim Marriages—Regulations and Contestations, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK, 24–25 April 2017.
-
Norwegian Official Reports (2013). Norges offentlige utredninger 2013:1. Det livssynsåpne samfunn. En helhetlig tros- og livssynspolitikk. Utredning fra utvalg oppnevnt ved kongelig resolusjon 25. juni 2010. Avgitt til Kulturdepartementet 7. januar 2013. [Norwegian Official Reports 2013:1; A society open to religious and worldview diversity].
-
Roald Anne S. (2009). Muslimer i nya samhällen. Individuella eller kollektiva rättigheter? [Muslims in new societies. Individual or collective rights?]. Stockholm: Daidalos.
-
Wærstad Tone L. (2015). Protecting Muslim Minority Women’s Human Rights at Divorce: Application of the Protection against Discrimination Guarantee in Norwegian Domestic Law, Private International Law and Human Rights Law [PhD dissertation in Law, University of Oslo].
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 687 | 97 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 194 | 14 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 106 | 17 | 4 |
Contesting the Boundaries between Civil and Religious Marriage
State and Mosque Discourse in Pluralistic Norway
In: Sociology of IslamSearch for other papers by Anja Bredal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This article discusses the relation between civil and religious marriage, at the interface between the state’s legal discourse and the discourses and practices of Norwegian mosques. A central question is what kinds of effects the governance of Islam in Norway has had in the field of marriage. Against the background of political debates on the system of marriage authorization of faith communities, the analysis draws on interviews with public officials and administrative leaders of mosques, the majority of whom are authorized to perform legal marriage. While the Norwegian state concept of marriage authorization is based on a separation of the civil act and the religious act, mosque administrators rather highlight the similarity and continuity between the two. Contrary to state concerns, though, the analysis suggests that the civil marriages have affected the religious, rather than vice versa. What is interesting is that this reasoning actually results in Norwegian marriage certificates replacing or suppressing the Islamic marriage contract, although agreements on mahr (dower) are still made more informally. Thus, our findings suggest that there has been a secularizing effect.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 687 | 97 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 194 | 14 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 106 | 17 | 4 |