Maniatis's Arguments about Impossibilities and Rigging in Hammad et al. (2008): the Importance of Pizlo (2008)

in Seeing and Perceiving
No Access
Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Lydia Maniatis (2009) adroitly argues our theories of a perspective illusion to do with angles are rigged in favour of our conclusions. Nice point. She develops useful alternative accounts of our illusion. However, her rigging argument involves the Bishop Berkeley induction problem. In response, we point out 2D features can specify 3D shapes. Counter to her induction problem, we argue specification requires a 3D environment of a particular, restricted kind, resulting in meaningful 2D features, as in the landmark Pizlo (2008) treatise.

Maniatis's Arguments about Impossibilities and Rigging in Hammad et al. (2008): the Importance of Pizlo (2008)

in Seeing and Perceiving

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 25 25 3
Full Text Views 47 47 6
PDF Downloads 4 4 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0