Save

Fechner's Aesthetics Revisited

In: Seeing and Perceiving
Authors:
J. Farley Norman 1Department of Psychology, Western Kentucky University, USA. Farley.Norman@wku.edu

Search for other papers by J. Farley Norman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Amanda Beers 2Department of Psychology, Western Kentucky University, USA

Search for other papers by Amanda Beers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Flip Phillips 3Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Skidmore College, 815 North Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA. flip@skidmore.edu

Search for other papers by Flip Phillips in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

Gustav Fechner is widely respected as a founding father of experimental psychology and psychophysics but fewer know of his interests and work in empirical aesthetics. In the later 1800s, toward the end of his career, Fechner performed experiments to empirically evaluate the beauty of rectangles, hypothesizing that the preferred shape would closely match that of the so-called 'golden rectangle'. His findings confirmed his suspicions, but in the intervening decades there has been significant evidence pointing away from that finding. Regardless of the results of this one study, Fechner ushered in the notion of using a metric to evaluate beauty in a psychophysical way. In this paper, we recreate the experiment using more naturalistic stimuli. We evaluate subjects' preferences against models that use various types of object complexity as metrics. Our findings that subjects prefer either very simple or very complex objects runs contrary to the hypothesized results, but are systematic none the less. We conclude that there are likely to be useful measures of aesthetic preference but they are likely to be complicated by the difficulty in defining some of their constituent parts.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 817 154 8
Full Text Views 115 6 0
PDF Views & Downloads 100 14 0