Save

Cerebral Correlates and Statistical Criteria of Cross-Modal Face and Voice Integration

In: Seeing and Perceiving
Authors:
Frank Pollick
Search for other papers by Frank Pollick in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Scott Love
Search for other papers by Scott Love in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Marianne Latinus 3School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK; Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (CCNi), Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK

Search for other papers by Marianne Latinus in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

Perception of faces and voices plays a prominent role in human social interaction, making multisensory integration of cross-modal speech a topic of great interest in cognitive neuroscience. How to define potential sites of multisensory integration using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is currently under debate, with three statistical criteria frequently used (e.g., super-additive, max and mean criteria). In the present fMRI study, 20 participants were scanned in a block design under three stimulus conditions: dynamic unimodal face, unimodal voice and bimodal face–voice. Using this single dataset, we examine all these statistical criteria in an attempt to define loci of face–voice integration. While the super-additive and mean criteria essentially revealed regions in which one of the unimodal responses was a deactivation, the max criterion appeared stringent and only highlighted the left hippocampus as a potential site of face– voice integration. Psychophysiological interaction analysis showed that connectivity between occipital and temporal cortices increased during bimodal compared to unimodal conditions. We concluded that, when investigating multisensory integration with fMRI, all these criteria should be used in conjunction with manipulation of stimulus signal-to-noise ratio and/or cross-modal congruency.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 560 195 15
Full Text Views 137 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 40 5 0