Reading Other People’s Letters in the 1970s: Reconstructing Soviet Spectatorship in Il’i͡a Averbakh’s Other People’s Letters (1975)

in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


This paper studies audiences’ responses, published in the Soviet press of the 1970s, to Il’i͡a Averbakh’s 1975 film Other People’s Letters. Averbakh’s film was made in the context of a stiffening ideological situation in the country, on the one hand, and the commercialization of Soviet cinema, on the other hand. Young and adult viewers reacted to the film differently and recreated their own messages, in accordance to their position in the power structure. As it is evident from the analysis of film reviews and letters to the editors, regarding Other People’s Letters, the prevailing spectatorial position during the Brezhnev years was “negotiating,” thus continuing the tradition of the Thaw culture. It allowed Soviet viewers to discuss some unconventional questions, while still limiting their ability to openly talk about some other taboo topics. The negotiating position was challenged and manipulated by viewers who were associated with authoritative, official discourse.

Reading Other People’s Letters in the 1970s: Reconstructing Soviet Spectatorship in Il’i͡a Averbakh’s Other People’s Letters (1975)

in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review


AkimovA.K poznani͡u dobra i krasoty.” Molodoĭ kommunar (25 September 1976). Tula.

AndreevaA.Aksiomy, trebui͡ushchie dokazatel’stva.” Rabochiĭ (21 August 1976). Leningrad.

BaranovaS.Chuzhie pis’ma chitat’ nel’zi͡a.” Prizyv (3 October 1976). Vladimir.

BaruL.Kak byt’ s Zinoi Begunkovoi?Ul’i͡anovskaia pravda (15 October 1976). Ul’i͡anovsk.

BeumersBirgit. History of Russian Cinema. Oxford: Berg2009.

BorisovB.Dorozhe vsego chelovek.Krasnoe znami͡a (24 October 1976). Tomsk.

BrashinskiĭMikhail. “Roman s zastoem. 70-ye.” Iskusstvo kino 8 (August 1999): 88103.

BrashinskyMichael and HortonAndrew. The Zero Hour: Glasnost and Soviet Cinema in Transition. Princeton: Princeton UP1992.

BurgDavid. Oppozit͡sionnye nastroenii͡a molodezhi v gody posle “ottepeli.” Munich 1960.

BykovDmitriĭ. “Toska Il’i Averbakha.Kinovedcheskie zapiski 69 (2005); (accessed May 1 2012).

CohenLouis Harris. The Cultural-Political Traditions and Developments of the Soviet Cinema 1917-1972. New York: Arno Press1974.

ChristieIan and TaylorRichard. Eds. The Film Factory: Russian and Soviet Cinema in Documents 1896-1939. London: Routledge1994.

DobrenkoEvgeniĭ. The Making of the State Reader: Social and Aesthetic Contexts of the Reception of Soviet Literature. Trasl. Jesse M. Savage. Stanford: Stanford UP1997.

DobsonMiriam. Khrushchev’s Cold Summer. Gulag Returnees Crime and the Fate of Reform After Stalin. Ithaca: Cornell UP 2009.

FirstJoshua. “From Spectator to ‘Differentiated’ Consumer: Film Audience Research in the Era of Developed Socialism (1965-80).” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 9 no. 2 (Spring 2008): 31744.

FrolenkovaL.Devochki, ‘umei͡ushchie zhit’’.Bri͡anskiĭ rabochiĭ (22 October 1976). Bri͡ansk.

GarmashV.S chego chelovek nachinaetsi͡a?Tambovskai͡a pravda (12 November 1976). Tambov.

GolovskoĭValeriĭ. Mezhdu ottepel’i͡u i glasnost’i͡u: Kinematograf 70-kh. Moskva: Materik2004.

I͡AssonT.Ėkzamen na chelovechnost’.Sovetskai͡a Latvii͡a (2 November 1976). Riga.

KosinovaM.Parametry krizisa organizat͡sionno- ėkonomicheskoĭ sistemy sovetskogo kinematografa.Posle ottepeli: kinematograf 1970-kh. Shemi͡akinAleksandr and MikheevaI͡U. eds. Moskva: NII kinoiskusstva2008. 973.

KotkinStephen. Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization. Berkeley: U of California P1995.

LawtonAnna. “Toward a New Openess in Soviet Cinema, 1976-1987.Post New Wave Cinema in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Ed. GouldingD.. Bloomington: Indiana U. Press1989.

LenoeMatthew. Closer to the Masses: Stalinist Culture Social Revolution and Soviet Newspapers. Cambridge: Harvard UP2004.

LevinMark. “Otvetit’ na dobro.Molodezh’ Estonii (29 September 1976). Tallin.

MayneJudith. Cinema and Spectatorship. London: Routledge1993.

OsipovM.‘Trudnyĭ kharakter’ Zinki Begunkovoĭ.Orlovskai͡a pravda (15 October 1976). Orel.

OushakineSerguei. “The Terrifying Mimicry of Samizdat.” Public Culture 13 no. 2 (Spring 2001): 191214.

OvchinnikovaI.V poedinke s cherstvost’i͡u.Leningradskai͡a pravda (22 September 1976). Leningrad.

PoverennovaM.Kakoĭ ty stanesh’, Zinka?Volzhskai͡a kommuna (8 September 1976). Kuibyshev.

RajagopalanSudha. Indian Films in Soviet Cinemas: The Culture of Movie-going After Stalin. Bloomington: Indiana UP2008.

RodionovaI.Vospitanie dushevnoĭ chutkosti.Volgogradskai͡a pravda (2 November 1976). Volgograd.

RudakovA.Chuzhie pis’ma.Severnai͡a pravda (22 October 1976). Kostroma.

Rudnit͡skiĭK.Uroki nravstvennosti.” Iskusstvo kino 9 (1976): 7894.

SecklerDawn. “Engendering Genre: The Contemporary Russian Buddy Film.” PhD diss. University of Pittsburgh 2009.

SheglovA.Zina Begunkova i t͡selyĭ mir.” Znami͡a (31 August 1976). Kaluga.

ShelepovaN.Pedagogi—o novom fil’me.” Kuznet͡skiĭ rabochiĭ (23 November 1976). Novokuznet͡sk.

ShevaldinaA.Prava li Zinka?Severnai͡a pravda (22 October 1976). Kostroma.

SoloveĭP.9-b zadaёt voprosy.” Smena (31 October 1976). Leningrad.

StaigerJanet. Perverse Spectators: The Practices of Film Reception. NY: NY UP2000.

StaceyJackie. Star-gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. London: Routledge1994.

StitesRichard. Russian Popular Culture: Entertainment and Society since 1900. Cambridge: Cambridge UP2000.

Svenit͡skiĭAnatoliĭ. “Chto delat’ s ‘sil’nym kharakterom’?Smena (5 December 1976). Leningrad.

T. “Uznala sebi͡a.” Smena (31 October 1976). Leningrad.

T. Olga. “Pochemu ikh ti͡anet drug k drugu?” Smena (31 October 1976). Leningrad.

TaylorRichard. “A ‘Cinema for the Millions’: Soviet Socialist Realism and the Problem of Film Comedy.” Journal of Contemporary History 18 no. 3 (July 1983): 43961.

TolstykhN.Pravda dobra.” Smena (8 January 1977). Leningrad.

——. “Pravda dobroty.” Molodost’ Aĭzerbaĭdzhana (1 November 1977). Baku.

T͡Sivi͡anYuri. Early Cinema in Russia and Its Cultural Reception. Trans. Alan Bodger. New York: Routledge1994.

V.D. “Da zdravstvuet sil’nai͡a lichnost’.” Bri͡anskiĭ rabochiĭ (22 October 1976). Bri͡ansk.

VasilenkoB.Pochemu nel’zia chitat’ chuzhie pis’ma.” Krasnoi͡arskii rabochiĭ (15 October 1976). Krasnoi͡arsk.

VolovinskiĭV.O pis’makh, chto poshli po rukam.” Vecherni͡ai͡a Perm’ (4 September 1976). Perm’.

YoungbloodDenise. Movies for the Masses: Popular Cinema and Soviet Society in the 1920s.Cambridge: Cambridge UP1992.

YurchakAlexei. Everything Was Forever until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Princeton: Princeton UP2005.

“Za dobrotu? Da no trebovatel’nui͡u!” Vecherniĭ Sverdlovsk (11 November 1976). Sverdlovsk.

Zal’t͡sman V. “Glavnyĭ urok.” Tagil’skiĭ rabochiĭ (13 September 1976). Tagil.


Since its establishment in 1925Sovetskiĭ ėkran appeared sporadically constantly changing its name. The journal was not published between 1941 and 1957. Since July 1959 Sovetskiĭ ėkran was published under the administration of the Ministry of Culture of the USSR and the Union of Workers in Cinematography. Later in January 1966 it became a part of the State Committee on Cinematography of the Council of Ministers of the USSR and of the Cinematographers’ Union of the USSR.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 12 12 7
Full Text Views 4 4 4
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0