Constraining Elites: The Impact of Treaty Networks on Foreign Policy

in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


In democracies, elites should be responsive to public opinion. This is especially true in Eastern Europe, where politicians fear electoral sanctions in the process of reform (Roberts and Kim 2011). Public opinion in general in Eastern Europe has been overwhelmingly in favor of European integration (Caplanova et al. 2004). In Ukraine, public opinion was in favor of increased cooperation with the eu, while in Moldova, public opinion was in favor of increased cooperation with the Russian led Customs Union. Ukraine refused to sign an association agreement with the eu, while Moldova enthusiastically signed the same association agreement. Why should both Ukrainian and Moldovan political elites have chosen not to be responsive to public opinion in such an important decision? Using network analysis of bilateral treaties between Russia and Moldova and Russia and Ukraine, I predict the responsiveness of political elites to public opinion toward European integration. I argue that the denser a treaty network between a weaker state and the regional hegemon, the less likely political elites will be to cooperate and move toward European integration. Conversely, less dense treaty networks allow politicians more flexibility in following their own preferences. Further, I offer a prediction for other states in the fsu to seek further cooperation with the eu.



ÅslundAnders, and KuchinsAndrew. 2009. The Russia Balance Sheet. Peterson Institute.

ÅslundAnders, and OlcottMartha Brill. 1999. Russia after Communism. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

BalmacedaMargarita Mercedes. 1998. “ Gas, Oil and the Linkages between Domestic and Foreign Policies: The Case of Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies50(2): 25786.

BremmerIan. 1994. “ The Politics of Ethnicity: Russians in the New Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies46(2): 26183.

BurantStephen R.1995. “ Foreign Policy and National Identity: A Comparison of Ukraine and Belarus.” Europe-Asia Studies47(7): 112544.

CarterBarry E., TrimblePhillip R., and WeinerAllen S.. 2007. International Law. Aspen Publishers.

Center, University of Michigan Survey Research. 1980. The American Voter. University of Chicago Press.

DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper.

DownsGeorge W., RockeDavid M., and BarsoomPeter N.. 1996. “ Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?”International Organization50(3): 379406.

ElkinsZachary, GuzmanAndrew T., and SimmonsBeth A.. 2006. “ Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000.” International Organization60(4): 81146.

GarnettS., and TreninD.. 1999. “ Russia and Its Nearest Neighbors.” In Russia After Communism, eds. Anders Åslund and Martha Brill Olcott. Washington d.c.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

GoldmanMarshall I.2010. Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia. Oxford University Press US.

HaasErnst B.1961. “ International Integration: The European and the Universal Process.” International Organization15(3): 36692.

HaasErnst B. 1968. The Uniting of Europe: Political; Social; and Economic Forces, 19501957. Stanford University Press.

HansenFlemming Splidsboel. 2013. “ Integration in the Post-Soviet Space.” International Area Studies Review16(2): 14259.

HansenFlemming Splidsboel. 2015. “ Do the cis Member States Share Foreign Policy Preferences?”Journal of Eurasian Studies6(1): 6978.

JohannBernd. 2013. “ Ukrainian Support for eu Association Agreement Declines | Europe | | 29.10.2013.” Deutsche Welle. (January 27, 2015).

JonesSeth G.2007. The Rise of European Security Cooperation. Cambridge University Press.

KaufmanStuart J.1996. “ Spiraling to Ethnic War: Elites, Masses, and Moscow in Moldova’s Civil War.” International Security21(2): 10838.

KaufmanStuart J., and BowersStephen R.. 1998. “ Transnational Dimensions of the Transnistrian Conflict.” Nationalities Papers26(1): 129.

KeohaneRobert O.2005. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.

KingCharles. 1994. “ Eurasia Letter: Moldova with a Russian Face.” Foreign Policy (97): 10620.

KingCharles. 1998. “ Ethnicity and Institutional Reform: The Dynamics of ‘indigenization’ in the Moldovan assr - pb - Routledge.” Nationalities Papers26(1): 57.

KingCharles. 1999. The Moldovans. Hoover Press.

KolossovVladimir, and John O’Loughlin. 1998. “ Pseudo-States as Harbingers of a New Geopolitics: The Example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic (tmr).” Geopolitics3(1): 151.

KolstøPål, and MalginAndrei. 1998. “ The Transnistrian Republic: A Case of Politicized Regionalism.” Nationalities Papers26(1): 103.

KoremenosBarbara. 2002. “ Can Cooperation Survive Changes in Bargaining Power? The Case of Coffee.” The Journal of Legal Studies31(s1): S25983.

KorhonenKeijo. 2010. Interview with Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Finland, Keijo Korhonen. Tucson, Arizona.

KyddAndrew. 2000. “ Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation.” International Organization54(2): 32557.

KyddAndrew. 2001. “ Trust Building, Trust Breaking: The Dilemma of nato Enlargement.” International Organization55(4): 80128.

KyddAndrew. 2005. Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton University Press.

LemkeDouglas. 2002. Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge University Press.

LemkeDouglas, and WernerSuzanne. 1996. “ Power Parity, Commitment to Change, and War.” International Studies Quarterly40(2): 23560.

LipsonCharles. 1984. “ International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs.” World Politics37(1): 123.

LöwenhardtJohn, HillRonald J., and LightMargot. 2001. “ A Wider Europe: The View from Minsk and Chisinau.” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-)77(3): 60520.

LynchDov. 2002. “ Separatist States and Post-Soviet Conflicts.” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-)78(4): 83148.

MrozJohn Edwin, and PavliukOleksandr. 1996. “ Ukraine: Europe’s Linchpin.” Foreign Affairs75(3): 5262.

OlcottMartha, AslundAnders, and GarnettSherman W.. 1999. Getting It Wrong: Regional Cooperation and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

SierraPardo, OscarB.2011. “ Shaping the Neighbourhood? The eu’s Impact on Georgia.” Europe-Asia Studies63(8): 137798.

“Poll: Moldovans Prefer Customs Union to eu.” 2012. Kyiv Post.

PutnamRobert. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Prentice-Hall. (January 22, 2015).

PutnamRobert D.1988. “ Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization42(3): 42760.

RumerEugene B.1994. “ Eurasia Letter: Will Ukraine Return to Russia?”Foreign Policy (96): 12944.

SinclairSir Ian McTaggart. 1984. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Manchester University Press ND.

SlobodchikoffMichael O. 2013a. “Russia’s Monroe Doctrine Just Worked in Ukraine.”Russia Direct. (November 22, 2013).

SlobodchikoffMichael O. 2013b. Strategic Cooperation: Overcoming the Barriers of Global Anarchy. Lexington Books.

SlobodchikoffMichael O. 2014. Building Hegemonic Order Russia’s Way: Order, Stability, and Predictability in the Post-Soviet Space. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

SternJonathan. 2006a. “Natural Gas Security Problems in Europe: The Russian–Ukrainian Crisis of 2006.” Asia-Pacific Review13(1): 3259.

SternJonathan. 2006b. “ The Russian-Ukrainian Gas Crisis of January 2006.” Oxford Institute for Energy Studies16: 512.

TreninDmitri. 2007. “ Russia Redefines Itself and Its Relations with the West.” The Washington Quarterly30(2): 95105.

“Ukraine’s Sharp Divisions.” 2014. bbc News. (June 14, 2015).

WillertonJohn P. et al. 2006. “ Complex Security Institutions: Nested Bilateralism in the Commonwealth of Independent States.” In Shambaugh/itrag Conference. Building Synergies: Institutions and Cooperation in World Politics. University of Iowa, Iowa City, ia, 12–14.

WillertonJohn P., GoertzGary, and SlobodchikoffMichael O.. 2015. “ Mistrust and Hegemony: Regional Institutional Design, the fsu-cis, and Russia.” International Area Studies Review18(1): 2652.

WillertonJohn P., SlobodchikoffMichael O., and GoertzGary. 2012. “ Treaty Networks, Nesting, and Interstate Cooperation: Russia, the fsu, and the cis.” International Area Studies Review15(1): 5982.

WolchikSharon L., and CurryJane Leftwich, eds. 2011. Central and East European Politics: From Communism to Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield.


In previous studies, Slobodchikoff (2013b) has shown that the denser a treaty network, the less likely a bilateral relationship is likely to devolve into conflict.


While the data are through 2005, the treaty networks did not significantly change after 2005. The networks and the relationships had already been established.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9 9 6
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0