Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
This paper addresses the question of ḥadīth qudsī as an independent sub-category of ḥadīth within the Imāmī literary corpus. It focuses on al-Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī’s (d. 1104/1693) al-Jawāhir al-saniyya fī-l-aḥādīth al-qudsiyya which appears to be the earliest extant Shīʿī compilation entirely devoted to this sort of material. Of the various forms of ḥadīth qudsī in al-ʿĀmilī’s work special attention is paid to traditions in which an Imam cites God directly, without an intermediary in the form of a prophet or an angel. I argue that such traditions represent a more flexible perception of the Imam-Divine relationship than the one familiar to us from theological treatises starting from the Buwayhid period (334/945-447/1055).
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aerts, Stijn, “Canon and canonisation of ḥadīth,” EI³.
al-ʿĀmilī, Bahāʾ al-Dīn, al-Wajīza fī ʿilm al-dirāya, Qum, 1970.
Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali, The Divine Guide in Early Shīʿism: The Sources of Esotericism in Islam, English translation by David Streight, Albany: SUNY Press, 1994.
Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali, “Al-Shaykh al-Mufīd (m. 413/1022) et la question de la falsification du Coran,” Rivista degli Studi Orientali 87 (2014), pp. 156-176.
Ansari, Hassan, L’imamat et l’Occultation selon l’imamisme: Étude bibliographique et histoire des textes, Leiden: Brill, 2016.
Bihtāsh, Yadullāh, Ṣaḥīfa-yi rastgārī: aḥādīs̱-i qudsī, chahārdah maʿṣūm va anbiyāʾ ʿalayhim al-salām, ed. Muḥammad-Kāẓim Bihniyā, Tehran, 2000.
al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad b. Ismāʿīl, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, ed. Muḥammad Zuhayr b. Nāṣir al-Nāṣir, Beirut, 2002.
van Ess, Josef, Theology and Society in the Second and Third Centuries of the Hijra, English translation by John O’Kane, Leiden: Brill, 2017, vol. 1.
Graham, William Albert, Divine Word and Prophetic Word in Early Islam: A Reconsideration of the Sources, with Special Reference to the Divine Saying or Ḥadīth Qudsī, Mouton, The Hague, Paris: Mouton & Co, 1977.
Graham, William Albert, “Ḥadīth qudsī,” EI³.
Ḥasan al-Shīrāzī, Kalimat allāh, Beirut, 1969.
al-Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī b. al-Ḥusayn, Amal al-āmil, ed. Aḥmad al-Ḥusaynī, Najaf, 1955.
al-Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī b. al-Ḥusayn, al-Jawāhir al-saniyya fī l-aḥādīth al-qudsiyya, Beirut, 1982.
Ibn Bābawayh, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī, al-Iʿtiqādāt, ed. ʿIṣām ʿAbd al-Sayyid, Qum, 1993.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, al-Farq bayn al-Qurʾān al-karīm wa-l-ḥadīth al-qudsī, ed. Nāyif b. Qablān al-Sulayfī al-ʿUtaybī, Mecca, 1997.
Jeffery, Arthur, Two Muqaddimas to the Qurʾanic Sciences: The Muqaddima to the ‘Kitāb al-mabānī’ and the Muqaddima of Ibn ʿAṭiyya to his Tafsīr, Cairo, 1954.
Kohlberg, Etan, “Aspects of Akhbari Thought in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries,” Eighteenth-Century Renewal and Reform in Islam, ed. Nehemia Levtzion and John Obert Voll, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1987, pp. 133-160, repr. in idem, Belief and Law in Imāmī Shīʿism, Aldershot: Variorum, 1991, art. XVII.
Kohlberg, Etan, “Authoritative Scriptures in Early Imāmī Shīʿism,” Les Retours aux écritures: fondamentalismes présents et passés, ed. E. Patlagean and A. Le Boulluec, Louvain and Paris: Peeters and Bibliothèque de l’École des Hautes Études, Sciences religieuses, 1991, pp. 295-312.
Kohlberg, Etan, “Introduction [to the section on Ḥadīth],” The Study of Shiʿi Islam, ed. Farhad Daftary and Miskinzoda Gurdofarid, London, 2014, pp. 165-179.
Kohlberg, Etan, “Some Imāmī Shīʿī Views on the Ṣaḥāba,” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 5 (1984), pp. 143-175, repr. in Etan Kohlberg, Belief and Law in Imāmī Shīʿism, Aldershot: Variorum, 1991, article IX.
Kohlberg, Etan, “Some Notes on the Imāmite Attitude to the Qurʾān,” Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition: Essays Presented to Richard Walzer on his Seventieth Birthday, ed. Samuel Miklos Stern, Albert Hourani, and Vivian Brown. Oxford: B. Cassirer, 1972, pp. 209-224.
Kohlberg, Etan, “The Term Muḥaddath in Twelver Shīʿism,” Studia Orientalia memoriae D.H. Baneth dedicata, Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1979, pp. 39-47, repr. in Etan Kohlberg, Belief and Law in Imāmī Shīʿism, Aldershot: Variorum, 1991, article V.
Kohlberg, Etan and Amir-Moezzi Mohammad Ali, Revelation and Falsification: the Kitāb al-Qirāʾāt of Aḥmad b. Muḥammad al-Sayyārī, Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Madelung, Wilferd, “Akhbāriyya,” EI².
Madelung, Wilferd, “ʿAbd-al-Ḥamīd b. Abū’l-Ḥadīd,” Encyclopaedia Iranica.
Madelung, Wilferd, “Batriyya or Butriyya,” EI².
al-Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir, Biḥār al-anwār, Beirut, 1983.
McDermott, Martin J., The Theology of al-Shaikh al-Mufīd (d. 413/1022), Beirut: Dar al-Mashreq, 1978.
Modarressi, Hossein, Crisis and Consolidation in the Formative Period of Shīʿite Islam: Abū Jaʿfar Ibn Qiba al-Rāzī and his Contribution to Imāmite Shīʿite Thought, Princeton: Darwin Press, 1993.
Modarressi, Hossein, “Early Debates on the Integrity of the Qurʾān: a Brief Survey,” Studia Islamica 7 (1993), pp. 5-39.
(Al-Shaykh) al-Mufīd, Muḥammad b. Muḥammad al-Nuʿmān, Awāʾil al-maqālāt, ed. Ibrāhīm al-Anṣārī, Qum, 1993.
Muḥammad ʿAlī al-Tahānawī, Mawsūʿat kashshāf al-iṣṭilāḥāt wa-l-funūn, Beirut, 1996.
Muḥammad ʿAwwāma, Min ṣiḥāḥ al-aḥādīth al-qudsiyya: miʾat ḥadīth qudsī maʿa sharḥihā, Jeddah, 2007.
Muḥsin al-Ḥusaynī al-Amīnī, al-Aḥādīth al-qudsiyya al-mushtaraka bayna al-sunna wa-l-shīʿa, Tehran, 2004.
Musa, Aisha Y., Ḥadīth as Scripture: Discussions on the Authority of Prophetic Traditions in Islam, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Muṣṭafā al-ʿAdawī, al-Ṣaḥīḥ al-musnad min al-aḥādīth al-qudsiyya, Ṭanṭā, 1989.
al-Muwaffaq b. Aḥmad b. Muḥammad al-Khwārizmī, Kitāb al-Manāqib, ed. Mālik al-Ḥamūdī, Qum, 1991.
al-Najāshī, Aḥmad b. ʿAlī, Rijāl al-Najāshī, Beirut, 2010.
Nöldeke, Theodor, Schwally Friedrich, Bergsträßer Gotthelf and Pretzl Otto, The History of the Quran, edited and translated by Wolfgang H. Behn, Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Riḍā al-Ḥusaynī, “Al-Muṣṭalaḥ al-rijālī ‘asnada ʿanhu’ mādhā yaʿnī? wa-mā hiya qīmatuhu al-rijāliyya?,” Turāthunā 3 (Qum, 1986).
Scarcia, Gianroberto, “Al-Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī,” EI².
al-Ṭihrānī, Aghā Buzurg, al-Dharīʿa ilā taṣānīf al-Shīʿa, Najaf, 1976, repr. Beirut, n.d.
al-Ṭūsī, Abū Jaʿfar, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan, Amālī al-Shaykh al-Ṭūsī, ed. Muḥammad Ṣādiq Baḥr al-ʿUlūm, Baghdad, 1964.
al-Ṭūsī, Abū Jaʿfar, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan, Ikhtiyār maʿrifat al-rijāl known as Rijāl al-Kashshī, ed. Jawād al-Qayyūmī al-Iṣfahānī, Qum, 2005.
al-Ṭūsī, Abū Jaʿfar, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan, Rijāl al-Ṭūsī, ed. Jawād al-Qayyūmī al-Iṣfahānī, Qum, 1993.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 286 | 21 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 46 | 3 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 55 | 10 | 5 |
This paper addresses the question of ḥadīth qudsī as an independent sub-category of ḥadīth within the Imāmī literary corpus. It focuses on al-Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī’s (d. 1104/1693) al-Jawāhir al-saniyya fī-l-aḥādīth al-qudsiyya which appears to be the earliest extant Shīʿī compilation entirely devoted to this sort of material. Of the various forms of ḥadīth qudsī in al-ʿĀmilī’s work special attention is paid to traditions in which an Imam cites God directly, without an intermediary in the form of a prophet or an angel. I argue that such traditions represent a more flexible perception of the Imam-Divine relationship than the one familiar to us from theological treatises starting from the Buwayhid period (334/945-447/1055).
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 286 | 21 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 46 | 3 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 55 | 10 | 5 |