This paper discusses the political power dynamics over land between the state and traditional leadership in relation to issues surrounding the Malawi new land laws of 2016 (i.e., land reforms). The passing of new land bills in parliament represented one of the most contentious political issues in the country between the state and traditional leadership. From a political perspective, the paper takes this disagreement over land policy between traditional leadership and the state as a clash between two sources of power with land reform being merely a platform. Using the land reform process therefore, the paper examines how these sources of power were applied. The paper therefore contributes to the existing debate of the relationship between state and traditional leadership in the modern era. The findings are derived from a qualitative research through key informant interviews with selected traditional leaders, government officials, members of parliament, Civil Society activists and academics. The findings confirm what the literature says that land reform is basically a highly politicized process. Another important finding is that the current political factors show that the land reform process will ultimately be in favour of traditional leadership’s interest. The paper argues that both formal and informal powers are used by government and chiefs as they influence each other regarding which reforms to be adopted bearing mind that the interests of these players are embedded the institutional design of the same reforms.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adams, M. (2000). Breaking ground: Development aid for land reform. ODI.
Ainslie, A., & Kepe, T. (2016). Understanding the resurgence of traditional authorities in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 42(1), 19–33. doi: 10.1080/03057070.2016.1121714.
Antwi-Bediako, R. (2018). Chiefs and nexus of challenges in land deals: An insight into blame perspectives, exonerating chiefs during and after Jatropha investment in Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1–20.
Baldwin, K. (2014). When politicians cede control of resources: Land, chiefs, and coalition-building in Africa. Comparative Politics, 46(3), 253–271.
Chinsinga, B. (2008). Exploring the politics of land reforms in Malawi: A case study of the Community Based Rural Land Development Programme (CBRLDP). Working Paper No. 20, Institutions for Pro Poor Growth (IPPG).
Chinsinga, B. (2011). The politics of land reforms in Malawi: The case of the Community Based Rural Land Development Programme (CBRLDP). Journal of International Development, 23, 380–393.
Chinsinga, B., & Wren-Lewis, L. (2014). Grabbing land in Malawi. In: T. Søreide and A. Williams (Eds.), Corruption, Grabbing and Development: Real World Challenges (pp. 93–102). Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781782544418.00017.
Chirwa, E. W. (2009). Land Issues and markets. Working Paper, Unpublished Manuscript.
Chiweza, A. (2007). The ambivalent role of chiefs: Rural decentralization initiatives in Malawi. In L. Buur & H. M. Kyed (Eds.), State recognition and democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa: A new dawn for traditional authorities? Palgrave Macmillan.
Eberbach, K., Kubera, A., Okoth, N., & Watanabe, A. (2009). Contemporary traditional leaders a study on land and governance in South Africa. International Meeting Process for debate and proposals on governance. Institute for Research and Debate on Governance, Polokwane Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.institut-gouvernance.org/en/chapitrage/fiche-chapitrage-66.html.
Englebert, P. (1997). The contemporary African state: Neither African nor state. Third World Quarterly, 18(4), 767–776.
Englebert, P. (2002). Patterns and theories of traditional resurgence in tropical Africa. Mondes en développement, De Boeck Université, l, 118(2), 51–64.
Government of Malawi. (1999). Report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry on Land Policy Reform: Volume 1. GOM.
Government of Malawi. (2012). Improving land sector governance in Malawi: Implementation of the land governance assessment framework. GOM.
Grovogui, S. (2011). Sovereignty and cultures of global governance. Paper presented at Makerere Institute of Social Research (MISR). Contemporary Debates Workshop: Political Studies, Kampala, Uganda, 16–21 May.
Hall, R., Borras, S. M., & White, B. (2014). Land reform. In V. Desai & R. Potter (Eds.), A companion to development studies, 3rd Ed. Routledge.
Heywood, A. (2019). Politics, 5th Ed. Macmillan Higher Education.
Hull, S., Babalola, K., & Whittal, J. (2019). Theories of land reform and their impact on land reform success in Southern Africa. Land, 8(172), 1–28. doi:10.3390/land8110172.
Kayuni, H., Dulani, B., Chasukwa, M., & Sambo, G. (2017). Perceptions on traditional leaders and democratic governance in Malawi. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 4(1), 42–54.
Kishindo, P. (2004). Customary land tenure and the new land policy in Malawi. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 22(2), 213–225.
Laurits, J. (2018, January 13). The state vs. government: Opposing concepts of authority defined. Retrieved from https://www.johnlaurits.com/2018/difference-government-state-authority/.
Lunduka, R. W. (2009). Land rental, markets, investment, and productivity under customary land tenure systems in Malawi [Doctoral Dissertation, Norwegian University of Life Sciences].
Maravi Post. (2016). Landnet Malawi rubbishes traditional chiefs’ protest against Customary Land Act. Retrieved from http://www.maravipost.com/landnet-malawi-rubbishes-traditional-chiefs-protest-customary-land-act/.
Martín, V., Darias, L., & Fernández, C. (2019). Agrarian reforms in Africa 1980–2016: Solution or evolution of the agrarian question? Africa, 89(3), 586–607.
Mhone, G. (1987). Agricultural and food policy in Malawi. In T. Mkandawire & N. Bourenane (Eds.), The state and agriculture in Africa (pp. 59–86). CODESRIA Book Series.
National Statistical Office. (2008). National Statistical Office Population and housing census: Preliminary report. NSO.
National Statistics Office. (2018). 2018 Population and Housing Census Preliminary Report. NSO.
Ng’ombe, A., & Mushinge, A. (2014). The role of culture and belief systems belief systems in shaping reform. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(4), 123–134.
Ntsebeza, L. (2006). Democracy compromised: Chiefs and the politics of land in South Africa. HSRC Press.
Ofuho, C. (2000). The legitimacy and sovereignty dilemma of African states and governments: Problems of colonial legacy. In B. Bakut & S. Dutt (Eds.), Africa at the Millennium: An agenda for mature development. Palgrave.
Peters, P. (2006). Challenges in land tenure and land reform in Africa: An anthropological. keynote presentation to Workshop on Land Tenure, Land Reform and Land Use: Assessing the Linkages, Humboldt University, Berlin.
Philpott, D. (1999). Westphalia, authority and international society. Political Studies, XL(VII), 566–589.
Roth, M., & Haase, D. (1998). Land tenure security and agricultural performance in Southern African. BASIS-CRSP.
Sahn, D., & Arulpragasam, J. (1991). Development through dualism? Land tenure, policy, and poverty in Malawi. Working Paper 9, Cornell Food and Nutrition Policy Program.
Sibanda, N., & Chikohomero, R. (2018). Republic of Malawi: Land reform and rural transformation. Political Economy of Southern Africa (PESA) Editorial. 1Q2018/19 Retrieved from https://politicaleconomy.org.za/download/malawi-land-reform-and-rural-transformation-overview/?wpdmdl=4502&refresh=5cb880871265f1555595399.
Silungwe, C. (2015). Law, land reform and responsibilisation: A perspective from Malawi’s land question. Pretoria University Law Press.
Takane, T. (2008). Customary land tenure, inheritance rules, and smallholder farmers in Malawi. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(20), 269–291.
Tshuma, L. (1995). Law, state and the agrarian question in Zimbabwe [Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Warwick].
Wikehult, T., Hartmann, F., & Kayuni, H. (2016). The Local Governance Performance Index (LGPI) in Malawi: Selected findings on land. Program on Local Governance and Development (LGD), Report October 2016 Series 2016:4.
World Bank. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. World Bank Policy Research Report. World Bank and Oxford University Press.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 792 | 270 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 30 | 12 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 55 | 20 | 3 |
This paper discusses the political power dynamics over land between the state and traditional leadership in relation to issues surrounding the Malawi new land laws of 2016 (i.e., land reforms). The passing of new land bills in parliament represented one of the most contentious political issues in the country between the state and traditional leadership. From a political perspective, the paper takes this disagreement over land policy between traditional leadership and the state as a clash between two sources of power with land reform being merely a platform. Using the land reform process therefore, the paper examines how these sources of power were applied. The paper therefore contributes to the existing debate of the relationship between state and traditional leadership in the modern era. The findings are derived from a qualitative research through key informant interviews with selected traditional leaders, government officials, members of parliament, Civil Society activists and academics. The findings confirm what the literature says that land reform is basically a highly politicized process. Another important finding is that the current political factors show that the land reform process will ultimately be in favour of traditional leadership’s interest. The paper argues that both formal and informal powers are used by government and chiefs as they influence each other regarding which reforms to be adopted bearing mind that the interests of these players are embedded the institutional design of the same reforms.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 792 | 270 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 30 | 12 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 55 | 20 | 3 |