The Role of the BUPA Judgement in the Legal Framework for Services of General Economic Interest

in Tilburg Law Review
No Access
Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The article analyses the BUPA judgment and the considerable changes that it has brought to the interpretation and application of the four Altmark criteria to services of general economic interest. By making the criteria more flexible, the General Court has put in question the definition of the basic features of those services, e.g. universal coverage. As a result, it would be easier for a service to be considered as a service of general economic interest, which in turn may undermine the effectiveness of the Services Directive. In addition, it is argued that there is value added in the adoption of a framework directive for services of general economic interest in order to mitigate the resulting legal uncertainty and to establish broad principles and conditions for the provision of services of general economic interest.

The Role of the BUPA Judgement in the Legal Framework for Services of General Economic Interest

in Tilburg Law Review

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 2
Full Text Views 19 19 12
PDF Downloads 5 5 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0