The Return of Politicised Space: Carl Schmitt’s Re-Orientation of Transnational Law Scholarship

in Tilburg Law Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article addresses the possible relevance of the spatial dimensions of Carl Schmitt’s theoretical contribution to a regionalist model of international law focused upon large spaces (Grossraum). Does Schmitt’s Grossraum analysis allow us to better understand today’s situation, where it is not States considered as self-sufficient entities, but rather assemblages of States, brought together in regional power blocs, that are the central players within international relations, and hence creators and enforcers of transnational law? To answer this question, we need to consider the historical eclipse of the traditional model of the State, as well as the implications and possible contemporary relevance of Schmittian Grossraum analysis, particularly its theory of the spatial dimension of delimited territory as a central theme for international law scholarship. This study concludes with a series of generally constructive criticisms of Schmitt’s work in this field.

The Return of Politicised Space: Carl Schmitt’s Re-Orientation of Transnational Law Scholarship

in Tilburg Law Review

Sections

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 17 17 10
Full Text Views 2 2 2
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0