Lacking Rights and Justice in a Burning World: The Case for Granting Standing to Future Generations in Climate Change Litigation

in Tilburg Law Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The exacerbation of climate change effects has rendered the legal adaptation of granting future generations standing in climate change litigation, necessary to achieve intergenerational justice and to protect their human rights. International law and norms do not operate in a legal vacuum. Instead, they possess the evolutionary quality to respond to societal shifts specifically seen in climate change action. This transient quality is greatly questioned in the debate surrounding the current legal lacuna concerning the lack of legal recognition for future generations in climate change actions. This has consequential effects on intergenerational justice and their human rights. Whilst international law has implemented a number of climate change mitigation strategies, these are insufficient in protecting future generations. The granting of standing in climate change litigation adequately complements the current approaches in resolving the lacuna in the law between theory and practice.

Lacking Rights and Justice in a Burning World: The Case for Granting Standing to Future Generations in Climate Change Litigation

in Tilburg Law Review

Sections

References

AllenTThe Philippine Children’s case: Recognising Legal Standing for Future Generations’ [1993–1994] 6 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 713.

CaneySClimate Change, Human Rights and Moral Thresholds’ cited in GardinerS et al. (eds) Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (oup 2010).

Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea Against Pollution [1973] 993 U.N.T.S. 243.

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora [1973] 992 U.N.T.S. 243.

CoxRThe Liability of European States for Climate Change’ [2014] 30 (78) Utrecht J Int’l & Eur L 125.

De-ShalitAWhy Prosperity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations (Routledge1995).

FaureM and NollkaemperAInternational Liability as an Instrument’ [2007] 43 Stan. J. Int’l L. 124.

FaureMClimate Change Adaptation and Compensation’ in Jonathan Verschuuren (eds) Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Law (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2013).

GardinerSClimate Justice’ in Dryzek J.S et al (eds) The Oxford Handbook on Climate Change and Society (oup 2011).

GhaleighN.SSix Honest Serving Men’: Climate Change Litigation as Legal Mobilization and the Utility of Typologies’ [2010] 1 Climate Law 31.

GordonJInter-American Commission on Human Rights to Hold Hearing after Rejecting Inuit Climate Change Petition’ [2007] Winter Sust. Dev. L. & Pol’y 55.

HersteinOThe identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations’ [2009] 77 Geo. Wash L. Rev. 1173.

HornLClimate Change Litigation Actions for Future Generations’ [2008] Environment and Planning Law Journal 115.

HowarthRIntergenerational Justice’ in Dryzek J.S et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook on Climate Change and Society (oup 2011).

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report (cup 1996).

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Climate Change 2007 Impacts Adaptation and Vulnerability (cup 2007).

International Law Commission Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts [2001] Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10) chp.iv.E.1 art. 13.

Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [1998] 37 I.L.M. 22.

LawrencePJustice for future generations: climate change and international law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014).

Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency [2007] 127 S Ct 1438.

Mines de Potasse d’Alsace S.A. (mdpa) v. Onroerend Goed Maatschappij Bier B.V. et al [1988] hr Dutch Supreme Court nj 1989/743.

NussbaumMCapabilities and Rights’ in Pablo de Greiff and Ciaran Cronin (eds) Global Justice and Transnational Politics: Essays on the Moral and Political Challenges of Globalization (mit Press 2002).

PageEClimate Change, Justice and Future Generations’ in Lawrence P (ed) Justice for future generations: climate change and international law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014).

ParfitDEnergy policy and the further future: the identity problem’ in Maclean D and Brown P (eds) Energy and the Future (Rowman & Littlefield 1983).

ParryMCanzianiO et al (eds) Climate Change 2007 Impacts Adaptation and Vulnerability (cup 2007).

R v. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Pollution ex parte Greenpeace Ltd. [1994] 4 all E.R 329.

Re Minors Oposa v. Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources [1994] 33 ilm 174.

SaxJThe public trust doctrine in natural resource law: effective judicial intervention’ [1970] 68 Mich. L. Rev. 471.

SchlosbergDDefining Environmental Justice: Theories Movements and Nature (oup 2007).

ReviewSternThe Economics of Climate Change Chapter 2 “Economics Ethics and Climate Change”’ in unicef uk A Brighter Tomorrow: Climate Change Child Rights and Intergenerational Justice’ (ReportUNICEF 2007).

StoneCShould trees have standing? And other essays on law morals and the environment (Oceana Publications Dobbs Ferry 1996).

The Center For International Environmental Law ‘Climate Change & Human Rights: A Primer’ <http://www.ciel.org/Publications/cc_hre_23May11.pdf> accessed 29 November 2015.

TremmelJA Theory of Intergenerational Justice (Earthscan 2009).

un Environment Programme Convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals [1983] 1651 unts 333.

un Environmental Program 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development [1992] un Doc. A/conf.151/26 (vol 1).

un Framework Convention on Climate Change [1992] 1771 U.N.T.S 107.

un General Assembly United Nations Conference on the Human Environment [1972] A/res/2994.

un General Assembly Universal Declaration of Human Rights [1948] 217 A (iii).

un Human Rights Council Resolution 7/23. Human Rights and Climate Change [2008] U.N Doc. A/hrc/res/7/23.

Urgenda Foundation v. The State of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment) [2005] C/09/456689/ha za 13–1396.

Van DijkCCivil Liability for Global Warming in the Netherlands’ in Faure M and Peeters M (eds) Climate Change Liability (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2011).

VanderheidenSAtmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change (oup 2008).

Watt-CloutierSPetition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Seeking Relief from Violations Resulting From Global Warming Caused by Acts and Omissions of the United States <http://www.inuitcircumpolar.com/uploads/3/0/5/4/30542564/ finalpetitionicc.pdf> accessed 29 November 2015.

WeissEThe Planetary Trust: Conservation and Intergenerational Equity’ [1984] 11 Ecology L.Q. 495.

WildeMCivil Liability for Environmental Damage: A Comparative Analysis of Law and Policy in Europe and The United States (Kluwer Law International 2002).

World Commission on Environment and Development Our Common Future (oup 1987).

ZemansF.KLegal Mobilisation: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System’ [1983] 77 American Political Science Review 695.

13

Ibid 1187.

14

Ibid 1190.

48

Herstein (n. 12) 1180.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 14 14 3
Full Text Views 69 69 46
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0