Attention Mediates the Effect of Context-Relevant Social

Meaning on Prospective Duration Judgments

in Timing & Time Perception
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

In everyday life we perceive events as having durations. Recent research suggests that the labeling of a stimulus influences the experience of its duration. Plausibly, the social meaning attributed to a stimulus impacts upon the amount of attention allocated to it, with greater attention resulting in better encoding and longer reproduction times. However, direct evidence for the role of attention in this effect of social meaning on duration reproduction is lacking. The present study addresses this issue directly. Eighty-four male Hindu pilgrims attending the Kumbh Mela in India listened to an ambiguous sound clip and reproduced its duration in a prospective timing task. The context-relevant social meaning of this sound clip was manipulated through attributing the sound to either the religious festival or busy city streets. Attentional load was manipulated by asking half the participants to perform a concurrent task. Reproduced durations were longer in the Mela compared to the City condition but only when participants completed a single task. The finding that mere labeling of the stimulus impacts duration judgments in a prospective paradigm in the single-task but not the dual-task conditions suggests that the effect of social meaning is indeed mediated through the deployment of attentional resources.

Attention Mediates the Effect of Context-Relevant Social

Meaning on Prospective Duration Judgments

in Timing & Time Perception

Sections

References

BaijalS.JhaA.KiyonagaA.SinghR. & SrinivasanN. (2011). The influence of concentrative meditation training on the development of attention networks in early adolescence. Front. Psychol. 2153.

BalcetisE. & DunningD. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91612625.

BlockR. A.HancockP. A. & ZakayD. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychol. 134330343.

BlockR. A. & ZakayD. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 4184197.

BoyceS. J. & PollatsekA. (1992). Identification of objects in scenes: The role of scene background in object naming. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 18531543.

BrownS. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration. Percept. Psychophys. 38115124.

BrownS. W. (1997). Attentional resources in timing: interference effects in concurrent temporal and non-temporal working memory tasks. Percept. Psychophys. 5911181140.

BrownS. W. (2008). Time and attention: Review of the literature. In GrondinS. (Ed.) Psychology of time (pp. 111138). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

BrownS. W. (2010). Timing, resources, and interference: Attentional modulation of time perception. In NobreK. C. & CoullJ. T. (Eds.) Attention and time (pp. 107121). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.

BrownS. W. & MerchantS. M. (2007). Processing resources in timing and sequencing tasks. Percept. Psychophys. 69439449.

BrunerJ. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychol. Rev. 64123152.

BuffardiL. (1971). Factors affecting the filled-duration illusion in the auditory, tactual, and visual modalities. Percept. Psychophys. 10292294.

ChavajayP. & RogoffB. (1999). Cultural variation in management of attention by children and their caregivers. Dev. Psychol. 3510791090.

ColzatoL. S.HommelB. & ShapiroK. L. (2010). Religion and the attentional blink: Depth of faith predicts depth of the blink. Front. Psychol. 1147.

EislerA. D. (2003). The human sense of time: Biological, cognitive and cultural considerations. In BuccheriR.SanigaM. & StuckeyW. M. (Eds.) The nature of time: geometry physics and perception (pp. 518). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

EislerH. (1976). Experiments on subjective duration 1868–1975: A collection of power function exponents. Psychol. Bull. 8311541171.

EislerH. & EislerA. D. (1992). Time perception: Effects of sex and sound intensity on scales of subjective duration. Scand. J. Psychol. 33339358.

FieldD. T. & GroegerJ. A. (2004). Temporal interval production and short-term memory. Percept. Psychophys. 66808819.

FortinC. & BretonR. (1995). Temporal interval production and processing in working memory. Percept. Psychophys. 57203215.

GilS.RoussetS. & Droit-VoletS. (2009). How liked or disliked food affect time perception?Emotion9457463.

GreenwaldA. G. (1992). New Look 3: Unconcious cognition reclaimed. Am. Psychol. 47766779.

GrondinS. (2010). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72561582.

HicksR. E.MillerG. W. & KinsbourneM. (1976). Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed. Am. J. Psychol. 89719730.

HommelB. & ColzatoL. S. (2010). Religion as a control guide: On the impact of religion on cognition. Zygon45596604.

KitayamaS.DuffyS.KawamuraT. & LarsenJ. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychol. Sci. 14201206.

KlapprothF. (2007). Time perception, estimation paradigm, and temporal relevance. Percept. Mot. Skills104749757.

KowalK. H. (1987). Apparent duration and numerosity as a function of melodic familiarity. Percept. Psychophys. 42122131.

LezakM. D.HowiesonD. B.BiglerE. D.& TranelD. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

LiL. & WarrenW. H. J. (2004). Path perception during rotation: Influence of instructions, depth range, and dot density. Vis. Res. 4418791889.

MacarF.GrondinS. & CasiniL. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation. Mem. Cogn. 22673686.

McKayT. D. (1977). Time estimation: Effects of attentional focus and a comparison of interval conditions. Percept. Mot. Skills45584586.

PhillipsM. & CrossI. (2011). About musical time: The effect of age, enjoyment, and practical musical experience, on retrospective estimate of elapsed duration during music listening. In VatakisA.EspositoA.GiagkouM.CumminsF. & PapadelisG. (Eds.) Multidisciplinary aspects of time and time perception (pp. 125136). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

RaffoneA. & SrinivasanN. (2010). The exploration of meditation in the neuroscience of attention and consciousness. Cogn. Proc. 1117.

RattatA. C. & Droit-VoletS. (2012). What is the best and the easiest method of preventing counting in different temporal tasks?Behav. Res. Methods446780.

ShankarS.StevensonC.PandeyK.TewariS.HopkinsN. & ReicherS. D. (2013). A calming cacophony: Social identity and the experience of noise at the Magh Mela in Allahabad. J. Environ. Psychol. 368795.

SrinivasanN.HopkinsN.ReicherS. D.KhanS. S.SinghT. & LevineM. (2013). Social meaning of ambigous sounds influences retrospective duration judgements. Psychol. Sci. 2410601062.

ThomasE. A. C. & WeaverW. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception. Percept.Psychophys. 17363367.

TobinS.BissonN. & GrondinS. (2010). An ecological approach to prospective and retrospective timing of long durations: A study involving gamers. PLoS One5e9271.

ToppinoT. C. & LongG. M. (2004). Top-down and bottom-up processes in the perception of reversible figures: Toward a hybrid model. Dyn. Cogn. Proc. 130748768.

WegnerD. M. & BarghJ. A. (1998). Control and automaticity in social life. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T. & LindzeyG. (Eds.) Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1 pp. 446496). McGraw-Hill.

ZakayD. & BlockR. A. (1996). Time, internal clocks and movement. Adv. Psychol. 115143164.

ZakayD. & BlockR. A. (1997). Temporal cognition. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 61216.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Duration reproduction as a function of its attributed origin (Mela/City) and attentional load (single-task/dual-task).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 27 27 9
Full Text Views 88 88 65
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0