Save

Discriminative Fear Learners are Resilient to Temporal Distortions during Threat Anticipation

In: Timing & Time Perception
Authors:
Jessica I. Lake Department of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Search for other papers by Jessica I. Lake in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Warren H. Meck Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Search for other papers by Warren H. Meck in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Kevin S. LaBar Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Search for other papers by Kevin S. LaBar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Discriminative fear conditioning requires learning to dissociate between safety cues and cues that predict negative outcomes yet little is known about what processes contribute to discriminative fear learning. According to attentional models of time perception, processes that distract from timing result in temporal underestimation. If discriminative fear learning only requires learning what cues predict what outcomes, and threatening stimuli distract attention from timing, then better discriminative fear learning should predict greater temporal distortion on threat trials. Alternatively, if discriminative fear learning also reflects a more accurate perceptual experience of time in threatening contexts, discriminative fear learning scores would predict less temporal distortion on threat trials, as time is perceived more veridically. Healthy young adults completed discriminative fear conditioning in which they learned to associate one stimulus (CS+) with aversive electrical stimulation and another stimulus (CS−) with non-aversive tactile stimulation and then an ordinal-comparison timing task during which CSs were presented as task-irrelevant distractors. Consistent with predictions, we found an overall temporal underestimation bias on CS+ relative to CS− trials. Differential skin conductance responses to the CS+ versus the CS− during conditioning served as a physiological index of discriminative fear conditioning and this measure predicted the magnitude of the underestimation bias, such that individuals exhibiting greater discriminative fear conditioning showed less underestimation on CS+ versus CS− trials. These results are discussed with respect to the nature of discriminative fear learning and the relationship between temporal distortions and maladaptive threat processing in anxiety.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 874 137 16
Full Text Views 195 8 0
PDF Views & Downloads 76 8 0