Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
The Effect of Background Context on the Size–Time Illusion
In: Timing & Time PerceptionPrevious studies suggest that time perception may be altered by nontemporal stimulus properties, such as size and numerosity, where increases lead to a longer perception of time. These studies have led to the suggestion of a generalized magnitude system that processes abstract quantities. However, the majority of studies on this phenomenon have used simple stimuli, varying along one or two dimensions, and occurring in the same location. Here, we sought to explore the influence of the size–time illusion amongst complex visual scenes. Across five experiments, human participants judged the duration of two visual stimuli, of different sizes, appearing at different spatial locations for a range of sub-second durations. In half of the trials, these stimuli were overlaid on an image of a city street, with one stimulus presented farther away than the other. We found that larger stimuli were judged to be longer, but only when the larger stimulus was presented on the left side of space, and not when presented on the right or when the entire stimulus array was on the left. This effect extended to a marginal bias for left-sided stimuli to be judged as longer. However, we found that the size–time illusion for right-sided stimuli was reinstated when a background city context was presented, which may have been driven by an imposed effect of perceived distance. These results suggest that the size–time illusion is affected by the background context and location against which stimuli are presented, and provide important qualifications to theories of a common magnitude system.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ahrens M. B., , & Sahani M. (2011). Observers exploit stochastic models of sensory change to help judge the passage of time. Curr. Biol., 21, 200–206.
-
Alards-Tomalin D., , Leboe-McGowan J. P., , Shaw J. D., , & Leboe-McGowan L. C. (2014). The effects of numerical magnitude, size, and color saturation on perceived interval duration. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 40, 555–566.
-
Allman M.J., , Teki S., , Griffiths T.D., , & Meck W.H. (2014). Properties of the internal clock: first- and second-order principles of subjective time. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 65, 743–771.
-
Ayhan I., , Revina Y., , Bruno A., , & Johnston A. (2012). Duration judgments over multiple elements. Front. Psychol., 3, 459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00459.
-
Birngruber T., , Schroter H., , & Ulrich R. (2015). Introducing a control condition in the classic oddball paradigm: Oddballs are overestimated in duration not only because of their oddness. Atten. Percept. Psychophys., 77, 1737–1749.
-
Bobko D. J., , Bobko P., , & Davis M. A. (1986). Effect of visual display scale on duration estimates. Hum. Factors, 28, 153–158.
-
Brigner W. L. (1986). Effect of perceived brightness on perceived time. Percept. Mot. Skills, 63, 427–430.
-
Brown S. W. (1995). Time, change, and motion: The effect of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Percept. Psychophys., 57, 105–116.
-
Brown G. D., , McCormack T., , Smith M., , & Stewart N. (2005) Identification and bisection of temporal durations and tone frequencies: Common models for temporal and nontemporal stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 31, 919–938.
-
Cai Z. G., , & Connell L. (2015). Space-time interdependence: evidence against asymmetric mapping between time and space. Cognition, 136, 268–281.
-
Casasanto D., , & Boroditsky L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593.
-
Casasanto D., , Fotokopoulou O., , & Boroditsky L. (2010). Space and time in the child’s mind: evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cogn. Sci., 34, 387–405.
-
Charles J., , Sahraie A., , & McGeorge P. (2007). Hemispatial asymmetries in judgment of stimulus size. Percept Psychophys, 69, 687–698.
-
Cheng X., , Yang Q., , Han Y., , Ding X., , & Fan Z. (2014). Capacity limit of simultaneous temporal processing: How many concurrent ‘clocks’ in vision? PLoS One, 9, e91797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091797.
-
Dormal V., , & Presenti M. (2013). Processing numerosity, length and duration in a three-dimensional Stroop-like task: Towards a gradient of processing automaticity? Psychol. Res., 77, 116–127.
-
Dyjas O., , Bausenhart K. M., , & Ulrich R. (2012). Trial-by-trial updating of an internal reference in discrimination tasks: Evidence from effects of stimulus order and trial sequence. Atten. Percept. Psychophys., 74. 1819–1841.
-
Eagleman D. M., , & Pariyadath V. (2009). Is subjective duration a siagnature of coding efficiency? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 364(1525), 1841–1851.
-
Folta-Schoofs K., , Wolf O. T., , Treue S., , & Schoofs D. (2014). Perceptual complexity, rather than valence or arousal accounts for distracter-induced overproductions of temporal durations. Acta Psychol., 147, 51–59.
-
Gomez L. M., , & Robertson L. C. (1979). The filled-duration illusion: The function of temporal and nontemporal set. Percept. Psychophys., 25, 432–438.
-
Gorea A., , & Hau J. (2013). Time in perspective. Psychol. Sci., 24, 1477–1488.
-
Hayashi M. J., , Kanai R., , Tanabe H. C., , Yoshida Y., , Carlson S., , Walsh V., , & Sadato N. (2013). Interaction of numerosity and time in prefrontal and parietal cortex. J. Neurosci., 33, 883–893.
-
Isaacs R. (2001). The subjective duration of time in the experience of urban places. J. Urban Des., 6, 109–127.
-
Jazayeri M., , & Shadlen M. N. (2010). Temporal context calibrates interval timing. Nat. Neurosci., 13, 1020–1026.
-
Jewell G., , & McCourt M.E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93–110.
-
Jones M. R., , & McAuley J. D. (2005). Time judgments in global temporal contexts. Percept. Psychophys., 67, 398–417.
-
Kliegl K. M., , & Huckauf A. (2014). Perceived duration decreases with increasing eccentricity. Acta Psychol, 150, 136–145.
-
Kreutzer S., , Weidner R., , & Fink G.R. (2015). Rescaling retinal size into perceived size: Evidence for an occipital and parietal bottleneck. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 27, 1334–1343.
-
Lambrechts A., , Walsh V., , & van Wassenhove V. (2013). Evidence accumulation in the magnitude system. PLoS One, 8, e82122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082122.
-
Long G. M., , & Beaton R. J. (1980). The contribution of visual persistence to the perceived duration of brief targets. Percept. Psychophys., 28, 422–430.
-
Magnani B., , Mangano G.R., , Frassinetti F., , & Oliveri M. (2013). The role of posterior parietal cortices on prismatic adaptation effects on the representation of time intervals. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2825–2832.
-
Magnani B., , Frassinetti F., , Ditye T., , Oliveri M., , Costantini M., , & Walsh V. (2014). Left insular cortex and left SFG underlie prismatic adaptation effects on time perception: Evidence from fMRI. NeuroImage, 92, 340–348.
-
Matthews W. J., , Stewart N., , & Wearden J. H. (2011). Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 37, 303–313.
-
Mitchell C. T., , & Davis R. (1987). The perception of time in scale model environments. Perception, 16, 5–16.
-
Mo S. S., , & Michalski V. A. (1972). Judgement of temporal duration of area as a function of stimulus configuration. Psychonom. Sci., 27, 97–98.
-
New J. J., , & Scholl B. J. (2009). Subjective time dilation: Spatially local, object-based, or a global visual experience? J. Vis., 9, 1–11.
-
Nicholls M. E., , & Roberts G. R. (2002). Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases? Cortex, 38, 113–136.
-
Oliveri M., , Koch G., , & Caltagirone C. (2009). Spatial-temporal interactions in the human brain. Exp. Brain Res., 195, 489–497.
-
Ono F., , & Kawahara J. (2007). The subjective size of visual stimuli affects the perceived duration of their presentation. Percept. Psychophys., 69, 952–957.
-
Palumbo L., , Ogden R., , Makin A. D., , & Bertamini M. (2014). Examining visual complexity and its influence on perceived duration. J. Vis., 14, 3. doi: 10.1167/14.14.3.
-
Pooresmaeli A., , Arrighi R., , Biagi L., , & Morrone M. C. (2013). Blood oxygen level-dependent activation of the primary visual cortex predicts size adaptation illusion. J. Neurosci., 33, 15999–16008.
-
Predebon J. (2002). Viewing distance and estimates of duration. Percept. Mot. Skills, 95, 326–328.
-
Rammsayer T. H., , & Verner M. (2014). The effect of nontemporal stimulus size on perceived duration as assessed by the method of reproduction. J. Vis., 14, 17. doi: 10.1167/14.5.17.
-
Rammsayer T. H., , & Verner M. (2015). Larger visual stimuli are perceived to last longer from time to time: The internal clock is not affected by nontemporal visual stimulus size. J. Vis., 15, 5. doi: 10.1167/15.3.5.
-
Ryan L. J. (2011). Temporal context affects duration reproduction. J. Cogn. Psychol., 23, 157–170.
-
Santens S., , & Verguts T. (2011). The size congruency effect: Is bigger always more? Cognition, 118, 94–110.
-
Schindel R., , Rowlands J., , & Arnold D. H. (2011). The oddball effect: Perceived duration and predictive coding. J. Vis., 11, 1–9.
-
Schlauch R. S., , Ries D. T., , & DiGiovanni J. J. (2001). Duration discrimination and subjective duration for ramped and damped sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 109, 2880–2887.
-
Shih L. Y., , Chen L. F., , Kuo W. J., , Yeh T. C., , Wu Y. T., , Tzeng O. J., , & Hsieh J. C. (2009). Sensory acquisition in the cerebellum: An FMRI study of the cerebrocerebellar interaction during visual duration discrimination. Cerebellum, 8, 116–126.
-
Srinivasan M., , & Carey S. (2010). The long and the short of it: On the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time. Cognition, 116, 217–241.
-
Suzuki S., , & Peterson M. A. (2000). Multiplicative effects of intention on the perception of bistable apparent motion. Psychol. Sci., 11, 202–209.
-
Thomas E. A. C., , & Cantor N. E. (1975). On the duality of simultaneous time and size perception. Percept. Psychophys., 18, 44–48.
-
Thomas E. A. C., , & Cantor N. E. (1976). Simultaneous time and size perception. Percept. Psychophys., 19, 353–360
-
Tzelgov J., , Meyer J., , & Henik A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 18, 166–179.
-
Van Opstal F., , & Verguts T. (2013). Is there a generalized magnitude system in the brain? Behavioral, neuroimaging, and computational evidence. Front. Psychol., 4, 435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00435.
-
Varakin D. A., , Klemes K. J., , & Porter K. A. (2013). The effect of scene structure on time perception. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 66, 1639–1652.
-
Vicario C. M., , Pecoraro P., , Turriziani P., , Koch G., , Caltagirone C., , & Oliveri M. (2008). Relativistic compression and expansion of experiential time in the left and right space. PLOS One, 3, e1716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001716.
-
Walsh V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends Cogn. Sci., 7, 483–488.
-
Wichmann F. A., , & Hill N. J. (2001a). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept. Psychophys., 63, 1293–1313.
-
Wichmann F. A., , & Hill N. J. (2001b). The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept. Psychophys., 63, 1314–1329.
-
Wiener M., , Kliot D., , Turkeltaub P. E., , Hamilton R. H., , Wolk D. A., , & Coslett H. B. (2012). Parietal influence on temporal encoding indexed by simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography. J. Neurosci., 32, 12258–12267.
-
Wiener M., , Thompson J. C., , & Coslett H. B. (2014). Continuous carryover of temporal context dissociated response bias from perceptual influence for duration. PLoS One, 9, e100803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100803.
-
Yates M. J., , Loetscher T., , & Nicholls M. E. (2012). A generalized magnitude system for space, time, and quantity? A cautionary note. J. Vis., 12, 1–7.
-
Xuan B., , Zhang D., , He S., , & Chen X. (2007). Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. J. Vis., 7, 1–5.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 362 | 35 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 193 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 32 | 4 | 2 |
The Effect of Background Context on the Size–Time Illusion
In: Timing & Time PerceptionPrevious studies suggest that time perception may be altered by nontemporal stimulus properties, such as size and numerosity, where increases lead to a longer perception of time. These studies have led to the suggestion of a generalized magnitude system that processes abstract quantities. However, the majority of studies on this phenomenon have used simple stimuli, varying along one or two dimensions, and occurring in the same location. Here, we sought to explore the influence of the size–time illusion amongst complex visual scenes. Across five experiments, human participants judged the duration of two visual stimuli, of different sizes, appearing at different spatial locations for a range of sub-second durations. In half of the trials, these stimuli were overlaid on an image of a city street, with one stimulus presented farther away than the other. We found that larger stimuli were judged to be longer, but only when the larger stimulus was presented on the left side of space, and not when presented on the right or when the entire stimulus array was on the left. This effect extended to a marginal bias for left-sided stimuli to be judged as longer. However, we found that the size–time illusion for right-sided stimuli was reinstated when a background city context was presented, which may have been driven by an imposed effect of perceived distance. These results suggest that the size–time illusion is affected by the background context and location against which stimuli are presented, and provide important qualifications to theories of a common magnitude system.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 362 | 35 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 193 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 32 | 4 | 2 |