Aging and Time Perception for Short and Long Durations: A Question of Attention?

in Timing & Time Perception
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

This study examined the difference in the perception of time between young and older adults in a temporal bisection task with four different duration ranges from a few milliseconds (500 ms) to several seconds (30 s). In addition, individual cognitive capacities (short-term memory, working memory, processing speed, attention) were assessed with different neuropsychological tests. The results showed a general effect of age on the variability of time judgment, indicating a lower sensitivity to time in the old than in the younger adults, regardless of the duration range tested. In addition, the results showed that the individual differences in time sensitivity were explained by attention capacities, which decline with aging.

Sections
References
  • Army Individual Test Battery (1944). Manual of Directions and Scoring . Washington, DC, USA: War Department, Adjutant General’s Office.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BartolomewA. J.MeckW. H. & CirulliE. T. (2015). Analysis of genetic and non-genetic factors influencing timing and time perception? PlosOne10. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BaudouinA.VannesteS.PouthasV. & IsingriniM. (2006a). Age-related changes in duration reproduction: Involvement of working memory processes. Brain Cogn. 62 1723.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BaudouinA.VannesteS.IsingriniM. & PouthasV. (2006b). Differential involvement of internal clock and working memory in the production and reproduction of duration: A study on older adults. Acta Psychol. 121285296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BisiacchiP. S. & ConaG. (2016). Time perception and aging. In PachanaN. A. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of gerontology (pp. 18 )Singapore: Springer Science.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BlockR. A.ZakayD. & HancockP. A. (1998). Human aging and duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Aging 13 584596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BoppK. L. & VerhaeghenP. (2005). Aging and verbal memory span: A meta-analysis. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 60 223233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrickenkampR. (1998). D2: Test d’Attention Concentrée. Paris, France: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.

  • BrickenkampR.LiepmanD. & SchmidtL. (2010). D2-R: Test d’Attention Concentrée Révisé. Paris, France: Hogrefe.

  • BrinkJ. M. & McDowdJ. M. (1999). Aging and selective attention: An issue of complexity or multiple mechanisms? J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 543033.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BuckleyT.NortonM. C.DeberardM. S.Welsh-BohmerK. A. & TschanzJ. T. (2010). A brief metacognition questionnaire for the elderly: Comparison with cognitive performance and informant ratings The Cache County Study. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiat. 25 739747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CarlsonM. C.HasherL.ConnellyS. L. & ZacksR. T. (1995). Aging, distraction, and the benefits of predictable location. Psychol. Aging 10 427436.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CharnessN. H.FoxM. C. & MitchumA. L. (2011). Life-span cognition and information technology. In FingermanK. L.BergC. A.SmithJ. & AntonucciT. C. (Eds) Handbook of life-span development (pp. 331361). New York, NY, USA: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ClémentA. & Droit-VoletS. (2006). Counting in a temporal discrimination task in children and adults. Behav. Proc. 71164171.

  • CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.

  • ConnellyS. L.HasherL. & ZacksR. T. (1991). Age and reading: The impact of distraction. Psychol. Aging 6 533541.

  • CoullJ. T.ChengR. K. & MeckW. H. (2011) Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing. Neuropsychopharmacology 36 325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CraikF. & HayJ. (1999). Aging and judgment of durations: Effects of task complexity and method of estimation. Percept. Psychophys. 61 549560.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CraikF. I. M. & SalthouseT. A. (2000). The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CraikF. I. M. & SalthouseT. A. (2008). The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed.). New York, NY, USA & Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

  • DennisN. A. & CabezaR. (2008). Neuroimaging of healthy cognitive aging. In CraikF. I. M. & SalthouseT. A. (Eds). The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed.) (pp. 154). New York, NY, USA & Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Droit-VoletS. (2013). Time perception in children: A neurodevelopmental approach. Neuropsychologica 51220234.

  • Droit-VoletS. (2016). Development of time. Curr. Opin. Behav Sci. 8 102109.

  • Droit-VoletS. & WeardenJ. H. (2001). Temporal bisection in children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 80142159.

  • Droit-VoletS.ClémentA. & WeardenJ. (2001). Temporal generalization in children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 80271288.

  • Droit-VoletS.WeardenJ. & ZélantiP. (2015). Cognitive abilities required in time judgment depending on the temporal task used: a comparison of children and adults. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 68 2216–2242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ErdfelderE.FaulF. & BuchnerA. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. Comput. 28 1 11.

  • FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E. & McHughP. R. (1975). ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr. Res. 12 189198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GibbonJ. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychol. Rev. 84279325.

  • GibbonJ.ChurchR. M. & MeckW. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 423 5277.

  • GrondinS.OuelletB. & RousselM-E. (2004). Benefits and limits of explicit counting for discriminating temporal intervals. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 58 112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HalamishV.McGillivrayS. & CastelA. D. (2011). Monitoring one’s own forgetting in younger and older adults. Psychol. Aging 26631635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IvryR. B. & SchlerfJ. R. (2008). Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12273280.

  • KilleenP.FettermanJ. & BizoL. (1997). Time’s causes. In BradshawC. M. & SzabadiE. (Eds) Time and behavior: Psychological and neurobehaviour analyses (pp. 79131). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LamotteM.IzauteM. & Droit-VoletS. (2012). The consciousness of time distortions and their effect on time judgment: A metacognitive approach. Consc. Cogn. 21835842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LewisP. A. & MiallR. C. (2009). The precision of temporal judgement: Milliseconds, many minutes, and beyond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B.364 18971905.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LustigC. (2003). ‘Grandfather’s clock: Attention and interval timing in older adults. In MeckW. H. (Ed.) Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing (pp. 261293). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LustigC. & MeckW. H. (1998). Attention mediated temporal processing deficits as a function of age, signal modality and time of day. J. Cogn. Neurosci.10134135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LustigC. & MeckW. H. (2001) Paying attention to time as one gets older. Psychol. Sci. 12 478483.

  • LustigC. & MeckW. H. (2011). Modality differences in timing and temporal memory throughout the lifespan. Brain Cogn. 77 298303.

  • McAuleyJ. D.MillerJ. P.WangM. & PangK. C. H. (2010). Dividing time: Concurrent timing of auditory and visual events by young and elderly adults. Exp. Aging Res. 36 306324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCormackT.BrownG. D. AMaylorE. A.DarbyR. J. & GreenD. (1999). Developmental changes in time estimation: Comparing childhood and old age. Dev. Psychol. 3511431155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCormackT.BrownG. D. AMaylorE. A.RichardsonL. B. N & DarbyR. J. (2002). Effects of aging on absolute identification of duration. Psychol. Aging 17 363378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MerchantH.HarringtonD. L. & MeckW. H. (2013). Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36313336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParkD. C. & Reuter-LorenzP. A. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu. Rev. Psychol.60 173196.

  • PerbalS.Droit-VoletS.IsingriniM. & PouthasV. (2002). Relationships between age-related changes in time estimation and age-related changes in processing speed, attention and memory. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 9201216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PouthasV. & PerbalS. (2004). Time perception depends on accurate clock mechanisms as well as unimpaired attention and memory processes. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 64 367385.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RammsayerT. H. & LimaS. D. (1991). Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: Cognitive and perceptual factors. Percept. Psychophys. 50565574.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RamosV. F.EsquanaziA.VillegasM. A.WuT. & HallettM. (2016). Temporal discrimination threshold with healthy aging. Neurobiol. Aging 43 174179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RattatA. C. & Droit-VoletS. (2012). What is the best and easiest method of preventing counting in different temporal tasks? Behav. Res. Meth. 44 67–80.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reuter-LorenzP. A. & ParkD. (2014). How does it STAC up? Revisiting the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition. Neuropsychol. Rev. 24 355370.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RobertsonH.WardA.RidgewayV. & Nimmo-SmithI. (1994). Test of everyday attention . Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.

  • RobertsonI. H.WardA.RidgewayV. & Nimmo-SmithI. (1996). The structure of normal human attention. The Test of Everyday Attention. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2 523534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SalthouseT. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol. Rev. 103 403428.

  • SalthouseT. A. & BabcockR. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Dev. Psychol. 27 5 763776.

  • SalthouseT. A.WrightR. & EllisC. L. (1979). Adult age and the rate of an internal clockJ. Gerontol. 34 5357.

  • SpreenO. & StraussE. (1998). A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests (2nd ed.) (pp. 477490). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, Inc.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StaubB.Doignon-CamusN.DesprésO. & BonnefondA. (2013). Sustained attention in the elderly: What do we know and what does it tell us about cognitive aging? Ageing Res. Rev. 12 459468.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SurwilloW. W. (1964). Age and the perception of short intervals of time. J. Gerontol. 19 322324.

  • TodorovI.Del MissierF. & MäntyläT. (2014). Age-related differences in multiple task monitoring. PLoS One 9. doi: .

  • TreismanM. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the ‘internal clock’. Psychol. Monogr.77 113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TurgeonM.LustigC. & MeckW. H. (2016). Cognitive aging and time perception: Roles of bayesian optimization and degeneracy. Front. Aging Neurosci. 8102. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UlbrichP.ChuranJ.FinkM. & WittmannM. (2007). Temporal reproduction: Further evidence for two processes. Acta Pychol. 125 5165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UlbrichP.ChuranJ.FinkM. & WittmannM. (2009). Perception of temporal order: The effects of age, sex, and cognitive factors. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 16 198202.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VarkalM. D.YalvacD.TufanF.TuranS.CengizM. & EmulM. (2013). Metacognitive differences between elderly and adult outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder. Eur. Ger. Med. 4 150153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WeardenJ. H. (2005). The wrong tree: Time perception and time experience in elderly. In DuncanJ.PhillipsL. & McLeodP. (Eds) Measuring the mind: Speed control and age (pp. 134156 ). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WeardenJ. H. (2016). The psychology of time perception. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • WeardenJ. H. & JonesL. A. (2012). Explaining between-group differences in performance on timing tasks. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove) 66 179–199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WeardenJ. HWeardenA. J. & RabbittP. (1997). Age and IQ effects on stimulus and response timing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23962979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WechslerD. (2000). WAIS-III Echelle d’Intelligence de Wechsler pour Adultes3me ed. Paris, France: ECPA.

  • ZélantiP. & Droit-VoletS. (2011). Cognitive abilities explaining age-related changes in time perception of short and long durations. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 109 2143157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Figures
  • View in gallery

    Proportion of long responses plotted against stimulus durations in the temporal bisection task for the young and the old adults in the 0.5–1 s, 1.25–2.5 s, 4–8 s and 15–30 s duration ranges.

  • View in gallery

    Proportion of long responses plotted against stimulus durations for the different duration ranges and for the old and the young adults.

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 187 187 19
Full Text Views 261 261 1
PDF Downloads 13 13 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0