Increased Frustration Predicts the Experience of Time Slowing-Down: Evidence from an Experience Sampling Study

in Timing & Time Perception
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Recent experience sampling research supports the idea that our experience of time speeds up when we are happy and slows down when we feel sad. However, this research had only examined a single negative mood state namely, sadness. Here, I extend this research by testing whether the experience of time speeding-up and slowing down is associated with other thoughts and negative mood states. Thirty-nine participants aged from 18 to 29 completed an experience sampling procedure that lasted for five consecutive days. The experience sampling procedure included measures of time experience (passage of time judgements), mood, levels of activity and time orientation. Increased frustration predicted the experience of time slowing down more than sadness and increased activity, thinking about the future and to a lesser extent happiness, predicted time moving more quickly. Implications of the findings are discussed in relation to laboratory-based studies of time perception.

Increased Frustration Predicts the Experience of Time Slowing-Down: Evidence from an Experience Sampling Study

in Timing & Time Perception



Arlot S. & Celisse A. (2010). A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat. Surv. 44079.

Beck A. T. Steer R. A. & Brown G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II . San Antonio, TX, USA: Psychological Corporation.

Blewett A. E. (1992). Abnormal subjective time experience in depression. Br. J. Psychiat. 161195200.

Block R. A. George E. J. & Reed M. A. (1980). A watched pot sometimes boils: A study of duration experience. Acta Psychol.468194.

Bürkner P.-C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Softw.80128.

Carver C. S & Scheier M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychol. Rev.971935.

Carver Charles S. & Scheier M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Csikszentmihalyi M. (2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York  NY USA: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

Droit-Volet S. (2016). Time does not fly but slow down in old age. Time Soc., 0961463X16656852.

Droit-Volet S. & Wearden J. H. (2015). Experience Sampling Methodology reveals similarities in the experience of passage of time in young and elderly adults. Acta Psychol. (Amst.)1567782.

Droit-Volet S. & Wearden J. (2016). Passage of time judgments are not duration judgments: Evidence from a study using Experience Sampling Methodology. Front. Psychol.7176.

Droit-Volet S. Trahanias P. & Maniadakis M. (2017). Passage of time judgments in everyday life are not related to duration judgments except for long durations of several minutes. Acta Psychol.173116121.

Droit-Volet S. Monceau S. Berthon M. Trahanias P. & Maniadakis M. (2018). The explicit judgment of long durations of several minutes in everyday life: Conscious retrospective memory judgment and the role of affects? PLoS One13 10.1371/journal.pone.0195397

Freedman V. A. Conrad F. G. Cornman J. C. Schwarz N. & Stafford F. P. (2014). Does time fly when you are having fun? A day reconstruction method analysis. J. Happiness Stud.15639655.

Hartley S. Haddock G. Vasconcelos e Sá D. Emsley R. & Barrowclough C. (2014). An experience sampling study of worry and rumination in psychosis. Psychol. Med.4416051614.

Killingsworth M. A. & Gilbert D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science330(6006) 932.

Kircanski K. Thompson R. J. Sorenson J. Sherdell L. & Gotlib I. H. (2015). Rumination and worry in daily life: Examining the naturalistic validity of theoretical constructs. Clin. Psychol. Sci.3926939.

Lang P. J. Bradley M. M. & Cuthbert B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In Lang P. J. Simons R. F. & Balaban M. T. (Eds) Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes. (pp. 97135). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Larson E. & von Eye A. (2006). Predicting the perceived flow of time from qualities of activity and depth of engagement. Ecol. Psychol.18113130.

Moberly N. J. & Watkins E. R. (2008). Ruminative self-focus and negative affect: An experience sampling study. .J. Abnorm. Psychol.117314323.

Core Team R (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from

Russell J. A. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cogn. Emot.2312591283.

Team Stan Development (2017). RStan: the R interface to Stan . R package version 2.16.2. Retrieved from

Thompson R. J. Mata J. Jaeggi S. M. Buschkuehl M. Jonides J. & Gotlib I. H. (2011). Concurrent and prospective relations between attention to emotion and affect intensity: an experience sampling study. Emotion1114891494.

Topper M. Emmelkamp P. M. G. Watkins E. & Ehring T. (2014). Development and assessment of brief versions of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Ruminative Response Scale. Br. J. Clin. Psychol.53(4) 402421.

Wearden J. H. (2015). Passage of time judgements. Consc. Cogn.38165171.

Wearden J. O’Donoghue A. Ogden R. & Montgomery C. (2014). Subjective duration in the laboratory and the world outside. In Arstila V. & Lloyd D. (Eds) Subjective time: The philosophy psychology and neuroscience of temporality. (pp. 287306). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

Zimbardo P. G. & Boyd J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.7712711288.


  • View in gallery

    Posterior estimates of change (beta coefficients) in passage of time judgements (“Would you say time was moving slowly, quickly or neither slowly or quickly?”) for each of the variables separately. The shaded portion of the error bars indicate the 95% most credible values for the effect centred on the mean, most likely value (circle).


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 39 39 28
Full Text Views 47 47 37
PDF Downloads 5 5 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0