Empirical research on the relationship between temporality and causation is mostly dominated by the question of how temporal information constrains causal cognition. However, Bechlivanidis and Lagnado (2013, Psychol. Sci., 24, 1563–1572; 2016, Cognition, 146, 58–66) recently claimed to have discovered the ‘reordering effect’, in which causal beliefs have an influence on perception of temporal order. This paper argues for an attentional interpretation of this effect and suggests a solution to the circularity that arises from the mutual constraint between causal assumptions and perception of temporal order. Finally, it is shown how the reordering effect may challenge certain philosophical accounts of temporal illusions.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Arstila V. (2011). Further steps in the science of temporal consciousness? In Vatakis A. , Esposito A. , Giagkou M. , Cummins F. & Papadelis G. (Eds), Multidisciplinary Aspects of Time and Time Perception (pp. 1–10). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Asai T. , & Kanayama N. (2012). ‘Cutaneous rabbit’ hops toward a light: unimodal and cross-modal causality on the skin. Front. Psychol., 3, 427 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00427
Bechlivanidis C. , & Lagnado D. (2013). Does the “why” tell us the ‘when”? Psychol. Sci., 24, 1563–1572.
Bechlivanidis C. , & Lagnado D. A. (2016). Time reordered: causal perception guides the interpretation of temporal order. Cognition, 146, 58–66.
Bramley N. R. , Gerstenberg T. , & Lagnado D. A. (2014). The order of things: inferring causal structure from temporal patterns. In Bello P. , Guarini M. , McShane M. & Scassellati B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 236–242). Austin, TX, USA: Cognitive Science Society.
Bramley N. R. , Gerstenberg T. , Mayrhofer R. , & Lagnado D.A. (2018). Time in causal structure learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 44, 1880–1910.
Brown H. V. , & Miles T. R. (1969). Prior stimulation and the perception of causality. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 21, 134–136.
Buehner M. J. (2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychol. Sci., 23, 1490–1497.
Buehner M. J. (2014). The psychology of time and causality. Euresis J., 7, 3–9.
Buehner M. J. (2017). Space, time and causality. In Waldmann M. R. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning (pp. 549–564). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Buehner M. , & Humphreys G. R. (2009). Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychol. Sci., 20, 1221–1228.
Bullock M. , & Gelman R. (1979). Preschool children’s assumptions about cause and effect: temporal ordering. Child Dev., 50, 89–96.
Child W. (2011). Vision and causal understanding. In Roessler J. , Lerman H. & Eilan N. (Eds), Perception, Causation, and Objectivity (pp. 161–180). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Choi H. , & Scholl B. J. (2006) Perceiving causality after the fact: postdiction in the temporal dynamics of causal perception. Perception, 35, 385–399.
Dainton B. (2008). Sensing change. Philos. Issues, 18, 362–384.
Dennett D. C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston, MA, USA: Little, Brown and Co.
Dennett D. C. , & Kinsbourne M. (1992). Time and the observer: the where and when of consciousness in the brain. Behav. Brain Sci., 15, 183–201.
A. Desantis, , Waszak F. , Moutsopoulou K. , & Haggard P. (2016). How action structures time: About the perceived temporal order of action and predicted outcomes. Cognition, 146, 100–109.
Eagleman D. M. , & Sejnowski T. J. (2000) Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science, 287, 2036–2038.
Faro D. , McGill A. L. , & Hastie R. (2013). The influence of perceived causation on judgments of time: an integrative review and implications for decision-making. Front. Psychol., 4, 217 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00217
Fernbach P. M. , Linson-Gentry P. , & Sloman S. A. (2007). Causal beliefs influence the perception of temporal order. In McNamara D. & Trafton J. (Eds), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 269–274). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Geldard F. A. , & Sherrick C. E. (1972). The cutaneous “rabbit”: a perceptual illusion. Science, 178, 178–179.
Grush R. (2007). Time and experience. In Müller T. (Ed.), Philosophie der Zeit (pp. 27–44). Frankfurt, Germany: Klosterman.
Grush R. (2009). The temporal content of perceptual experience. In Robins S. , Symons J. & Calvo P. (Eds), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology (pp. 592–606). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Hagmayer Y. , & Waldmann M. R. (2002). How temporal assumptions influence causal judgments. Mem. Cogn., 30, 1128–1137.
Hirsh I. J. , & Sherrick C. E. (1961). Perceived order in different sense modalities. J. Exp. Psychol., 62, 423–432.
Hoerl C. (2009). Time and tense in perceptual experience. Philos. Imprint, 9, 1–18.
Hume D. (1739–’40/1978). A Treatise of Human Nature (2nd ed.). New York, NY. USA: Oxford University Press.
Humphreys G. R. , & Buehner M. J. (2009). Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 35, 1542–1549.
Humphreys G. R. , & Buehner M. J. (2010). Temporal binding of action and effect in interval reproduction. Exp. Brain Res., 203, 465–470.
Kanabus M. , Szeląg E. , Rojek E. , & Pöppel E. (2002). Temporal order judgement for auditory and visual stimuli. Acta Neurobiol. Exp., 62, 263–270.
Lagnado D. A. , & Sloman S. (2004). The advantage of timely intervention. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 30, 856–876.
Lagnado D. A. , & Sloman S. A. (2006). Time as a guide to cause. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 32, 451–460.
Lagnado D. A. , Waldmann M. R. , Hagmayer Y. , & Sloman S. A. (2006). Beyond covariation: Cues to causal structure. In Gopnik A. & Schulz L. (Eds), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation (pp. 154–172). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Phillips I. (2014a). The temporal structure of experience. In Arstila V. & Lloyd D. (Eds), Subjective Time: the Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality (pp. 139–158). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Phillips I. (2014b). Experience of and in time. Philos. Compass, 9, 131–144.
Power S. E. (2011). Temporal illusions – philosophical considerations. In Vatakis A. , Esposito A. , Giagkou M. , Cummins F. & Papadelis G. (Eds), Multidisciplinary Aspects of time and Time Perception (pp. 11–35). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Rankin M. L. , & McCormack T. (2013). The temporal priority principle: at what ages does this develop? Front. Psychol., 4, 178 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00178
Rohde M. , Scheller M. , & Ernst M. O. (2014). Effects can precede their cause in the sense of agency. Neuropsychologia, 65, 191–196.
Rottman B. M. , & Keil F. C. (2012). Causal structure learning over time: Observations and interventions. Cogn. Psychol., 64, 93–125.
Schultz T. R. , & Mendelson R. (1975). The use of covariation as a principle of causal analysis. Child Dev. 46, 394–399.
Spence C. , & Parise C. (2010). Prior-entry: a review. Consc. Cogn., 19, 364–379.
Tecwyn E. , Bechlivanidis C. , Lagnado D. , Hoerl C. , Lorimer S. , Blakey E. , McCormack T. , &
Buehner M . (2019). Causality influences children’s and adults’ experience of temporal order. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2mtk4. Accessed on 13 September 2019.
Titchener E. B. (1908). Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan.
White P. A. (2006). How well is causal structure inferred from cooccurrence information? Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol., 18, 454–480.
White P. A. (2014). Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment. Cogn. Sci., 38, 38–75.
Woods A. J. , Lehet M. , & Chatterjee A. (2012). Context modulates the contribution of time and space in causal inference. Front. Psychol., 3, 371 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00371
Young M. E. (1995). On the origin of personal causal theories. Psychon. Bull. Rev., 2, 83–104.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 654 | 97 | 16 |
Full Text Views | 43 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 8 | 1 |
Empirical research on the relationship between temporality and causation is mostly dominated by the question of how temporal information constrains causal cognition. However, Bechlivanidis and Lagnado (2013, Psychol. Sci., 24, 1563–1572; 2016, Cognition, 146, 58–66) recently claimed to have discovered the ‘reordering effect’, in which causal beliefs have an influence on perception of temporal order. This paper argues for an attentional interpretation of this effect and suggests a solution to the circularity that arises from the mutual constraint between causal assumptions and perception of temporal order. Finally, it is shown how the reordering effect may challenge certain philosophical accounts of temporal illusions.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 654 | 97 | 16 |
Full Text Views | 43 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 8 | 1 |