From Reflexivity to Immediacy: Knowledge in Classical and Contemporary German Philosophy

in Transcultural Studies
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Classical German Philosophy belongs to the heritage of the European philosophical tradition, in which philosophical knowledge is defined as an epistemological reflection. Philosophy reflects on scientific knowledge to demonstrate its possibility. Thus objective knowledge is defined as a system whose principle is subjectivity. Since the 19th century, this concept of knowledge has been questioned as has subjectivity as such. Since then, philosophy in Germany has departed from comprehensive reflection and turned towards matters of detail or issues of application. In this paper I argue that the trend of skepticism about knowledge in modern German philosophy is associated with the radical social upheavals of modernity, but without being accompanied by a critical understanding of these upheavals. The first task is to reconstruct the classical concept of knowledge as it appeared in German philosophy, including its crucial relation to scientific knowledge and to history. The second task is to engage with the observation that this tradition of thought is in danger of being lost today. I will point out the role which the linguistic turn in philosophy has played and the means of deconstructing it.

From Reflexivity to Immediacy: Knowledge in Classical and Contemporary German Philosophy

in Transcultural Studies

Sections

References

AdornoTheodor W.Negative Dialectics transl. by DennisRedmond accessed February 15 2016 http://monkeybear.info/ND_Full.pdfSelf-experience of Freedom and Unfreedom .

AdornoTheodor W.Philosophische Elemente einer Theorie der GesellschaftFrankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp2008.

AlkemeyerThomasBuddeGunillaFreistDagmar (ed.) Selbst-Bildungen. Soziale und kulturelle Praktiken der SubjektivierungBielefeld: Transcript2013.

AristotleCategories’ in: Aristotle Categories and De Interpretatione transl. by J.L.AckrillOxford: Clarendon1963.

AristotleAnalytica Posteriora transl. by H.Tredennick Cambridge (ma): Harvard up1960.

BeckermannAnsgar ʽDie Rede von dem Ich und dem Selbst. Sprachwidrig und philosophisch höchst problematischʼ in: K.CroneR.SchnepfJ.Stolzenberg (ed.) Über die SeeleFrankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2010.

BulthaupPeter ʽSystematische Kategorien und historische Entwicklung einer Naturwissenschaft – dargestellt an der Chemie als Modell’. In: P.BulthaupZur gesellschaftlichen Funktion der NaturwissenschaftenLüneburg: zu Klampen1996.

BulthaupPeter ʽMöglichkeiten und Grenzen philosophischer Naturerkenntnis’ in P.BulthaupDas Gesetz der BefreiungLüneburg: zu Klampen1998.

BulthaupPeter ʽIdealistische und materialistische Dialektik’ in: P.BulthaupDas Gesetz der BefreiungLüneburg: zu Klampen1998.

DavidsonDonaldTruth and MeaningSynthese 17 (1967).

FichteJohann GottliebFoundations of the Entire Science of Knowledge transl. by P.Heath and J.LachsCambridge: Cambridge up1982.

FrankManfred (ed.) Analytische Theorien des SelbstbewußtseinsFrankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp1994.

FrankManfredʽHegel wohnt hier nicht mehr’Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung September 24 2015accessed February 13 2016 http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/hegel-wohnt-hier-nicht-mehr-die-kontinentale-philosophie-verschwindet-aus-europa-13816301.html.

GlinkaHolgerZur Genese autonomer Moral. Eine Problemgeschichte des Verhältnisses von Naturrecht und Religion in der frühen Neuzeit und der AufklärungHamburg: Meiner2 2012.

GruschkaAndreasVerstehen lehrenStuttgart: Reclam2011.

HegelG.W.F.Phenomenology of Spirit transl. by TerryPinkardaccessed February 15  2016  https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/21288399/Phenomenology%20translation%20English%20German.pdf.

HegelG.W.F.Science of Logic transl. by G.di GiovanniCambridge: Cambridge up2010.

HumeDavidA Treatise of Human NatureOxford: Oxford up2000.

KantImmanuelCritique of Pure Reason transl. by NormanKemp SmithLondon: Macmillan and Co.1929.

LeibnizGottfried WilhelmThe Principles of Nature and Grace, Founded on Reason’ transl. by LloydStrickland in LloydStricklandLeibnitz’s Monadology: A New Translation and GuideEdinburgh: Edinburgh up2014.

LockeJohnAn Essay Concerning Human UnderstandingOxford: Oxford up2008.

MarxKarlCapital Iaccessed February 15 2016 https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch16.htm.

MenasseRobertPhänomenologie der Entgeisterung. Geschichte des verschwindenden WissensFrankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp1995.

ReußRolandRiebleVolker ʽDie Freiheit der Wissenschaft ist bedrohtFrankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung October 18 2011accessed February 15 2016 http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/forschung-und-lehre/kritik-an-der-dfg-die-freie-wissenschaft-ist-bedroht-11497511.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_2.

RortyRichardPhilosophy and the Mirror of NaturePrinceton: Princeton up1979.

RosefeldtTobiasʽWir sollten mit eigenen Worten denken’Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung October 14 2015accessed February 13 2016 http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/forschung-und-lehre/analytische-und-kontinentale-philosophie-wir-sollten-mit-eigenen-worten-denken-13853239.html.

SiepLudwig ʽÜber den Sinn der Beschäftigung mit der deutschen Philosophie heuteInformation Philosophie 2 (2015).

SpinozaBaruch deEthics’ transl. by R.H.M.ElwesB.de SpinozaChief Works vol. iiNew York: Dover Publications1955.

StrawsonPeter FrederickIndividualsLondon: Methuen1959.

StrawsonPeter FrederickThe bounds of senseLondon: Methuen1966.

TheinChristianSubjekt und Synthesis. Eine kritische Studie zum Idealismus und seiner Rezeption bei Adorno Habermas und BrandomWürzburg: Königshausen und Neumann2013.

ZimaPeter V.Theorie des SubjektsStuttgart: utb2010.

23

HegelPhenomenology of Spirit720.

31

 Cf. Manfred Frank (ed.)Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewußtseins (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp1994) and more recently Ansgar Beckermann ʽDie Rede von dem Ich und dem Selbst. Sprachwidrig und philosophisch höchst problematischʼ in: K. Crone R. Schnepf J. Stolzenberg (ed.) Über die Seele Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2010 458–473. Beckermann attacks the linguistic use of ʽIʼ as an object: ʽthe Iʼ or ʽthe selfʼ. Finally he demands to delete these expressions in philosophy. In his argument he ignores systematically the difference between every day language and philosophical terminology. Since Aristotle philosophers are able to conceive speaking about the anima rationalis as the anima speaking about itself. Philosophical epistemology does not talk about states of mind but of the relation between the knowing subject and the known object. Thus an objective expression for subjective reflection is needed. The ancient term for this is anima rationale and the modern term is ʽIʼ or ʽselfʼ. The conditions of ist use are not linguistic but epistemological problems.

33

 Cf. R. MenassePhänomenologie der Entgeisterung. Geschichte des verschwindenden Wissens (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp1995).

39

 Cf. P. F. StrawsonIndividuals (London: Methuen1959). The subtitle of the book expresses the change in the concept of knowledge clearly: The tradition of reflexive epistemology is considered by Strawson as “descriptive metaphysics”.

51

 Cf. Th. W. AdornoPhilosophische Elemente einer Theorie der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp2008) 69 et seq.

52

HegelPhenomenology of Spirit579.

53

HegelScience of Logic12.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 6
Full Text Views 85 85 75
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0