In this paper, I investigate the issue of the professionalization of philosophy, taking as my starting point the debate triggered by the publication of Diego Marconi’s monograph, Il mestiere di pensare (Thinking as a Trade, 2014). This debate about the state of the art of Italian philosophy and the increased tendency towards specialization in philosophy is still on-going. It raises the issue of how to understand the putative split between analytic and continental philosophy, and how to establish standards or criteria for evaluating the quality of philosophical research. I conclude by posing the question about what needs to change in our knowledge practices and suggest that what is needed is an overhauling of our conceptions of trust, reliance, testimony, and justice, with a view to re-defining how social identity affects the way we operate in philosophical practice and how we establish our credibility.
FreelandC.1994 ‘Nourishing Speculation: A Feminist Reading of Aristotelian Science’ in Engendering Origins: Critical Feminist Readings in Plato and Aristotle ed. OnBat-Ami Bar (Albany: State University of New York Press) 145–46.
S. Haslanger‘Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?’Noûs34 (1)(2000): 31–55; S. Haslanger ‘Changing the Ideology and Culture of Philosophy: Not by Reason (Alone)’ Hypatia 23 (2)(2008): 210–223.
C. Witt‘Feminist Interpretations of the Philosophical Canon’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society(31) (2) (2006): 537–552. Martha Nussbaum for example believes that Aristotle’s ethical ideal is valuable.
Antony L.‘Different Voices or Perfect Storm: Why are there so few Women in Philosophy?’Journal of Social Philosophy43 (3) (2012): 227–255; Valian V. Why so slow? The advancement of women (Cambridge (ma): The m.i.t. Press 1998).
Steele C. M.Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do (New York: W.W. Norton2010); Steele C. M. Aronson J. ‘Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (69) (1995): 797–811.