This paper examines the changing roles and status of marṡiyah poets within hierarchies of political and religious authority during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. A direct link between the marṡiyah tradition and these institutions was a system of patronage that bound poets to the brokers of power. Although in the early 1700s marṡiyah poets were often dismissed as “inept poets,” in subsequent generations marṡiyah poets were nurtured by the patronage of political rulers and counted among the masters of Urdu literature. The Navābs of Avadh in particular, with their promotion of Shīʿī ritual in their capital Lucknow, helped to widen the audience for the marṡiyah. Such temporal rulers appropriated the marṡiyah’s wide appeal as a strategy for fostering social and cultural cohesion among an otherwise diverse population. The Urdu marṡiyah gave expression to the localized concerns and novel self-understanding of the Navābs as they broke politically and ideologically from Mughal rule. These changes in the systems of patronage for the marṡiyah and the genre’s unique association with Avadh’s political and religious project resulted in marṡiyah poets’ growing status in both literary and religious circles. As marṡiyah poets began to feature prominently in the religious life of Avadh, their authority and pious personas came to strain relations with marṡiyah poets’ more worldly patrons. By the mid-1800s, the growing power and influence of the British had undermined the traditional systems of literary patronage for the marṡiyah. But as marṡiyah poets sought out new sources of patronage, they helped extend Urdu’s popularity to distant regional centers. Across India, marṡiyah poets were instrumental in establishing networks of patronage and creating models of language and performance that were influential in Urdu literary circles well beyond the marṡiyah genre, placing such poets as Mīr Anīs and Mirzā Dabīr at the vanguard of crafting the cosmopolitan orientation of Urdu literary culture.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adīb, Sayyid Masʿūd Ḥasan Riẓvī. “Mīr Mustaḥsan Ḳhalīq aur Mīr Aḥsanullāh Maḳhlūq.” Nayā Daur (January 26, 1966): 33–39.
Ahmad, Muhammad Taqi, trans. Tarikh Badshah Begam: A Persian Manuscript on the History of Oudh. Reprint, Delhi: Idarah-i Adabiyat-i Delli, 1977.
Anjum, Ḳhalīq. Dillī kī Dargāh Shāh-e Mardāñ. Delhi: Urdu Academy, 1988.
ʿAz̤īmābādī, Shād. Fikr-e Balīġh. Edited by Naqī Aḥmad Irshād. Lucknow: Nasīm Book Depot, 1974.
Āzurdah, Mirzā Muḥammad Zamāñ. Mirzā Salāmat ʿAlī Dabīr: Ḥayāt aur Kār-nāme. New Delhi: Qaumī Council barā-e Faroġh-e Urdū Zabān, 2005.
Barnett, Richard B. “Embattled Begams: Women as Power Brokers in Early Modern India.” In Women in the Medieval Islamic World: Power, Patronage, and Piety. Edited by Gavin R. G. Hambly, 521–536. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
Barnett, Richard B. North India Between Empires: Awadh, the Mughals, and the British, 1720–1801. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
Blake, Stephen P. “Contributors to the Urban Landscape: Women Builders in Ṣafavid Isfahan and Mughal Shahjahanabad.” In Women in the Medieval Islamic World: Power, Patronage, and Piety. Edited by Gavin R. G. Hambly, 407–428. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
Browne, Edward G. A Literary History of Persia. 4 vols. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1930.
Cole, Juan. “Conversion to Imami Shiʿism in India.” In Encyclopædia Iranica Vol. 6, 232–234. New York: Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation, Inc., 1993.
Cole, Juan. Roots of North Indian Shīʿism in Iran and Iraq: Religion and State in Awadh, 1722–1859. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
Cole, Juan. “Women and the Making of Shiʿism.” In Sacred Space and Holy War: The Politics, Culture and History of Shiʿite Islam, 138–160. London: I. B. Tauris, 2002.
Das, Neeta. The Architecture of Imambaras. Lucknow: Mahotsava Patrika Samiti, 1991.
Das, Neeta. Architecture of Lucknow: Imambaras and Karbalas. Delhi: B. R. Publishing, 2008.
Faẓlī, Faẓl ʿAlī. Karbal Kathā. Edited by Mālik Rām and Muḳhtār ud-Dīn Aḥmad. Patna: Idārah-e Taḥqīqāt-e Urdū, 1965.
Fisher, Michael H. “Women and the Feminine in the Court and High Culture of Awadh, 1722–1856.” In Women in the Medieval Islamic World: Power, Patronage, and Piety, edited by Gavin R. G. Hambly, 489–519. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
Hoey, William, trans. Memories of Delhi and Faizabad: Being a Translation of the Tarikh-i-Farahbakhsh, From the Original Persian. By Muhammad Faiz Bakhsh. 2 vols. Rev. ed. Edited by Hamid Afaq Qureshi. Lucknow: New Royal Book Co, 2004.
Ḥusain, Ṣāliḥah ʿĀbid, ed. Anīs ke Marṡiye. 2 vols. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Taraqqī Urdū Bureau, 1990.
Ḥusain, Ṣāliḥah ʿĀbid. Mīr Anīs se Taʿāruf. New Delhi: Maktabah Jāmiʿah Ltd., 1975.
Inshā, Mīr Inshā Allāh Ḳhāñ. Daryā-e Lat̤āfat. Edited by Maulavī ʿAbd ul-Ḥaqq. New Delhi: Anjuman-e Taraqqī-e Urdū (Hind), 1988.
Kashmīrī, Akbar Ḥaidarī. Avadh meñ Urdū Marṡiye kā Irtiqāʾ. Lucknow: Niz̤āmī Press, 1981.
Keshani, Hussein. “Architecture and the Twelver Shiʿi Tradition: The Great Imambara Complex of Lucknow.” Muqarnas 23 (2006): 219–250.
Khan, Dargah Quli. Muraqqaʿ e Dehli: The Mughal Capital in Muhammad Shah’s Time. Translated by Chander Shekhar and Shama Mitra Chenoy. Delhi: Deputy Publications, 1989.
Knapczyk, Peter. “Crafting the Cosmopolitan Elegy in North India: Poets, Patrons, and the Urdu Marṡiyah, 1707–1857.” PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin, 2014.
Knapczyk, Peter. “Manuscript Research at Maulana Azad Library, Aligarh Muslim University.” Sagar (November 15, 2011). http://sagarjournal.org/maulana-azad-library-aligarh-muslim-university/.
Malik, Zahir Uddin. The Reign of Muhammad Shah, 1719–1748. London: Asia Publishing House, 1977.
Masʿūd, Nayyar. Anīs: Savāniḥ. New Delhi: Qaumī Council barā-e Faroġh-e Urdū Zabān, 2002.
Masʿūd, Nayyar. Marṡiyah-ḳhvānī kā Fann. Lucknow: Uttar Pradesh Urdu Academy, 1990.
McGregor, R. S., ed. The Oxford Hindi-English Dictionary. 3rd impression. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Naim, C. M. “Mir and His Patrons.” Annual of Urdu Studies 14 (1999): 85–95.
Naim, C. M. “Mughal and English Patronage of Urdu Poetry.” In The Powers of Art: Patronage in Indian Culture, edited by Barbara Stoler Miller, 259–276. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Naqvī, Sayyid Qudrat. “Ġhālib aur Anīs.” Risālah Jāmiʿah 100, no. 16–17 (2003): 107–119.
Pritchett, Frances W., trans. and ed. Āb-e Ḥayāt: Shaping the Canon of Urdu Poetry. By Muḥammad Ḥusain Āzād. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Qatīl, Mirzā Muḥammad Ḥasan. Haft Tamāshā. Translated by Muḥammad ʿUmar. Delhi: Maktabah Burhān Urdū Bāzār, 1968.
Rizvi, Saiyid Athar Abbas. A Socio-Intellectual History of the Isnā ʿAsharī Shīʿīs in India. 2 vols. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1986.
Sadiq, Mohammed. A History of Urdu Literature. 2nd ed. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1984.
Sarkar, Jadunath. Fall of the Mughal Empire. 4 vols. 4th ed. Reprint, New Delhi: Orient Blackswan, 2008.
Sharar, Abdul Halim. Lucknow: The Last Phase of an Oriental Culture. Translated and edited by E. S. Harcourt and Fakhir Hussain. London: Paul Elek, 1975.
Tandan, Banmali. The Architecture of Lucknow and Its Dependencies, 1722–1856: A Descriptive Inventory and an Analysis of Nawabi Types. New Delhi: Vikas, 2001.
Umar, Muhammad. Islam in Northern India during the Eighteenth Century. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1993.
Zaidī, ʿAlī Javād. Anīs ke Salām. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Qaumī Council barā-e Faroġh-e Urdū Zabān, 1997.
Ẓamīr, Mīr Muz̤affar Ḥusain. Maṡnavī Maz̤har ul-ʿAjāʾib. Lucknow: Mat̤baʿ Isnā ʿAsharī, 1894.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 84 | 84 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 4 | 4 | 0 |
This paper examines the changing roles and status of marṡiyah poets within hierarchies of political and religious authority during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. A direct link between the marṡiyah tradition and these institutions was a system of patronage that bound poets to the brokers of power. Although in the early 1700s marṡiyah poets were often dismissed as “inept poets,” in subsequent generations marṡiyah poets were nurtured by the patronage of political rulers and counted among the masters of Urdu literature. The Navābs of Avadh in particular, with their promotion of Shīʿī ritual in their capital Lucknow, helped to widen the audience for the marṡiyah. Such temporal rulers appropriated the marṡiyah’s wide appeal as a strategy for fostering social and cultural cohesion among an otherwise diverse population. The Urdu marṡiyah gave expression to the localized concerns and novel self-understanding of the Navābs as they broke politically and ideologically from Mughal rule. These changes in the systems of patronage for the marṡiyah and the genre’s unique association with Avadh’s political and religious project resulted in marṡiyah poets’ growing status in both literary and religious circles. As marṡiyah poets began to feature prominently in the religious life of Avadh, their authority and pious personas came to strain relations with marṡiyah poets’ more worldly patrons. By the mid-1800s, the growing power and influence of the British had undermined the traditional systems of literary patronage for the marṡiyah. But as marṡiyah poets sought out new sources of patronage, they helped extend Urdu’s popularity to distant regional centers. Across India, marṡiyah poets were instrumental in establishing networks of patronage and creating models of language and performance that were influential in Urdu literary circles well beyond the marṡiyah genre, placing such poets as Mīr Anīs and Mirzā Dabīr at the vanguard of crafting the cosmopolitan orientation of Urdu literary culture.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 84 | 84 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 4 | 4 | 0 |