Indigenous environmental disaster management systems are maintained in remotely located communities through intergenerational transmission. This fieldwork illuminates a wealth of unprecedented survival techniques, strategies and skills for offsetting the worst effects of a natural disaster in earthquake-prone areas of north-west Tanzania. Normally, responses from the government and its foreign development partners are hamstrung by bureaucratic red tape, taking too long in reaching disaster victims to be of any actual help. The formal mechanisms of global assistance constitute disaster management failure by design. Rather, it is the local experts who sustain human lives in the weeks and months before external aid comes to the rescue. Yet local communities’ contributions to their own survival remain invisible to central government and the global arena. Traditional means of forecasting environmental catastrophes and of providing essential assistance in the aftermath of natural disasters are reflections of cultural values, socio-economic sophistication and scientific expertise within communities whose resilience needs to be recognized, assisted and promoted. Educational curricula of the future, involving a new generation of academicians, should integrate this crucial indigenous knowledge into the nation’s mainstream disaster management framework.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
African Union. 2016. Programme of Action for the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 in Africa: In line with African Regional Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction. Accessed 4 September 2021 at https://www.preventionweb.net/files/67054_poaimplementationofthesendaiframewo[1].pdf.
Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred Ecology; Traditional Ecological knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
Bizimana, N. 1994. Traditional Veterinary Practice in Africa. Eschborn: Schriftenreihe der GTZ No. 243.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. and Wisner, B. 2003. At Risk, Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disaster. London: Routledge.
Bolling, M. and Schutle, A. 1999. Environmental Change and pastoral perceptions: Degradation and Indigenous knowledge in Two African pastoral communities. Human Ecology 27.3: 439–514.
Brokensha, D., Warren, D.M. and Werner, O. 1980. Indigenous knowledge systems and development. Washington DC: University of Press of America.
Caplan, P.I. (Ed). 2000. Risk revisited. London: Pluto Press.
Chambers, R., Pacey, A., and Thrupp, L.A. (Eds) 1989. Farmer First: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. London: Intermediate Technology.
DeWalt, B.R. 1994. Using indigenous knowledge to improve agriculture and natural resource management. Human Organization 53.2: 123–131.
Fernandez-Gimenez, M. 2000. The role of Mongolian nomadic pastoralist’s ecological knowledge in rangeland management. Ecological applications, 10.5: 1318–1326.
Gadigil, M., Rao, P.S., Utkarsh, G., Pramond, P., Chhatre, A. 2000. New meaning for old knowledge: The people’s biodiversity registers program. Ecological Applications 10.5: 1307–1317.
Gilbert, A. 1995. Small voice against the wind: Local knowledge and social transformation. Paper presented to the Fourth International symposium on the Contribution of Psychology to Peace. University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Haggan, N., Neis, B. and Baird, I.G. 2007. Fishers’ Knowledge in Fisheries Science and Management. Coastal Management Sourcebook NO. 4. Paris: UNESCO.
Hambati, H. 2013a. Weathering the storm: disaster risk and vulnerability assessment of informal Settlements in Mwanza City, Tanzania. Journal of Environmental Studies 70.6: 919–939.
Hambati, H. 2013b. Integrating traditional and modern ecological knowledge in improving agro-pastoral and arable land use efficiency in a resilient community in Northern Tanzania. Tanzanian Journal of Population Studies and Development 20.1&2: 17–36.
Hambati, H. 2017. Community Disaster Risk Assessment in Arusha City, Tanzania. Tanzanian Journal of Population Studies and Development 24.1&2: 67–93.
Hambati, H. and Gaston, G. 2015. Revealing the vulnerability of urban communities to flood hazard in Tanzania: A case of the Dar es Salaam City ecosystem. International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research 2.1 (July): article 3.
Hambati, H. and Rugumamu, W. 2005. Traditional environmental knowledge systems and management of vulnerable areas in north eastern Tanzania. UTAFITI Journal of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences 6.1: 1–21.
Hambati, H. and Yengoh, G. 2018. Community resilience to natural disasters in the informal settlements in Mwanza City, Tanzania. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61.0: 1758–1788.
Haulle, E. 2007. The role of traditional environmental knowledge systems in earthquake disaster management in Ludewa District, Tanzania. Unpublished MA dissertation. University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
International Council for Scientific Unions (ICSU). 2002. Science, Traditional Knowledge and Sustainable Development. ICSUSeries for Science and Sustainable Development No. 4. Paris: ICSU. Accessed 6 September 2021 at https://council.science>uploads>Science-traditional-knowledge%20(1).pdf.
Langill, S. and Landon, S. 1998. Indigenous Knowledge readings and resources for community-based natural resource management researchers. Vol. 4. Ottowa: International Development Resource Centre.
Latour, B. and Wolgar, S. 1986. Laboratory Life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mushala, H.M. 2000. Towards combating desertification in the SADC: A case study of Swaziland. Journal of the Geography Association of Tanzania. No. 28: 57–68. University of Dar es salaam.
National Environmental Management Council (NEMC). 2016. Bukoba earthquake environmental impact assessment, Report presented to the URT Vice President’s Office (September). Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Oba, G. 1994. The role of indigenous range management knowledge for desertification control in northern Kenya. Research report No. 4, EPOS, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Richey, L.A., Gissel, L.E., Kweka, O., Baerendtsen, P., Kragelund, P. Hambati, H. Mwanufupe, A. 2021. South-South humanitarianism: The case of COVID-organics in Tanzania. World Development Journal 141. Accessed 6 September 2021 at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105375.
Rugumamu, W. 1994. Tanzania Environmental Disaster Profile. Unpublished proceedings of the Disaster Management Training Programme Workshop. Office of the Prime Minister and United Nations Development Program, Dar es Salaam 1: 1–23.
Rugumamu, W. 2000. Managing Environmental Disaster: A search for an institutional framework for Tanzania. Journal of the Geographical Association of Tanzania 29: 79–92.
Rugumamu, W. 2003. Combining traditional knowledge and expert assistance – in environmental planning and management: A case of Msimbazi flood hazard in Dar es Salaam City. Journal of the Geographical Association of Tanzania 30: 78–89.
Rugumamu, W., Hambati, H. and Haulle, E. 2009. Building Community Resilience to Earthquake Disaster Risk Reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa: A case of South-western Tanzania. Proceedings of the African Regional Conference for Launching the International Year of Planet Earth (IYPE), Arusha, Tanzania.
Shivji, I. 2006. Let the people speak: Tanzania down the road to neo-liberalism. Dakar: Council for the Development of Economic and Social Research in Africa (CODESRIA)
Smith, K. 1992. Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster. London: Routledge.
Tearfund. 2006. Reducing risk of disaster in our communities, Tearfund root resources, India. Accessed 31 December 2007 at https://learn.tearfund.org/~/media/files/tilz/publications>roots>pdf.
United Nations (UN). 2016. Joint damaged and needs assessment report on earthquake. Kagera Region. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Originally published 26 September 2016. Posted 13 October, 2016. Accessed 6 September 2021 at https://reliefweb.int/report/united-republic-tanzania/joint-damage-and-needs-assessment-report-earthquake-kagera-region.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). 2005. The Canoe is the People: Indigenous Navigation in the Pacific. Indigenous Knowledge and Knowledge Transmission. Information pack. Interactive CD-ROMSeries No. 2. Paris: UNESCO. Accessed 6 September 2021 at https://en.unesco.org/links/transmission/canoe.
United Republic of Tanzania. 2004. National Disaster Management Policy. Prime Minister’s Office, Dar es Salaam.
United Republic of Tanzania. 2012. Population and Housing Census. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics.
United Republic of Tanzania. 2015. The Disaster Management Act, 2015. No. 7. Dar es Salaam: Government Printer.
United Republic of Tanzania. 2017. Disaster Management Regulations of 2017. Dar es Salaam: Government Printer.
United Republic of Tanzania. 2021. National Disaster Risk Management Framework, Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). Dar es Salaam: Government Printer.
US Geological Survey. 2016. Mw 5.9 Northern Tanzania Earthquake. Originally published 10 September 2016. Posted 14 September 2016. Accessed 6 September 2021 at https://reliefweb.int/map/united-republic-tanzania/m59-northern-tanzania-earthquake-10-september-2016.
Vandebroek, I., Reyes-García, V., de Albuquerque, U.P., Bussmann, R., Pieroni, A. 2011. Local knowledge: Who cares? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 7: article no. 35. Accessed 8 September 2021 at https://ethnobiomed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1746-4269-7-35.
Walker, D.H., Thorne, P.J., Sinclair, F.L., Thapa, B. et al.2013. Systems approach to comparing Indigenous and scientific knowledge: consistency and discriminatory power of indigenous and laboratory assessment of the nutritive value of tree fodder. Agricultural Systems 62.2: 87–103.
Warren, D.M. 1988. Linking scientific and indigenous agricultural systems. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
World Commission and Environment Development (WCED). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 797 | 321 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 20 | 4 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 27 | 7 | 5 |
Indigenous environmental disaster management systems are maintained in remotely located communities through intergenerational transmission. This fieldwork illuminates a wealth of unprecedented survival techniques, strategies and skills for offsetting the worst effects of a natural disaster in earthquake-prone areas of north-west Tanzania. Normally, responses from the government and its foreign development partners are hamstrung by bureaucratic red tape, taking too long in reaching disaster victims to be of any actual help. The formal mechanisms of global assistance constitute disaster management failure by design. Rather, it is the local experts who sustain human lives in the weeks and months before external aid comes to the rescue. Yet local communities’ contributions to their own survival remain invisible to central government and the global arena. Traditional means of forecasting environmental catastrophes and of providing essential assistance in the aftermath of natural disasters are reflections of cultural values, socio-economic sophistication and scientific expertise within communities whose resilience needs to be recognized, assisted and promoted. Educational curricula of the future, involving a new generation of academicians, should integrate this crucial indigenous knowledge into the nation’s mainstream disaster management framework.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 797 | 321 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 20 | 4 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 27 | 7 | 5 |