Origen’s Polemics in Princ 4.2.4: Scriptural Literalism as a Christo-Metaphysical Error

In: Vigiliae Christianae
Jordan Daniel Wood 1624 Estella Way, Webb City, MO. 64870 USA

Search for other papers by Jordan Daniel Wood in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


The relation between Books 1-3 and Book 4 of Origen’s Peri Archon has largely been left unspecified or denied. This is due to the apparent incongruence between the metaphysical discussions of the former section and the hermeneutical remarks of the latter. I argue that Origen’s threefold distinction of Scripture in Princ 4.2.4 draws upon key metaphysical conclusions of the earlier sections to depict the metaphysical structure of inspired Scripture as analogous to the Incarnation, and that this insight constitutes Origen’s fundamental polemic against scriptural literalism, the common error of the two primary adversaries of the work (the “simple” of the Church and the Marcionites). Peri Archon is thus unified around the polemical purpose of defending Origen’s allegorical exegesis.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 416 114 1
Full Text Views 191 5 2
PDF Views & Downloads 73 15 5