Scholars have long queried the influence of rhetorical theory upon Irenaeus’ thought. Despite the identification of various aspects of rhetorical theory in his work, a clear sense of the centrality and importance of rhetorical theory to Irenaeus has not emerged. In this article I argue that concepts belonging to literary and rhetorical theory are of central importance to Irenaeus’ anti-Gnostic polemic in ah 1.8.1-10.3 and even feature in his constructive thought. What emerges is a picture of Irenaeus as a polemicist and theologian who ably uses tools acquired in a thorough grammatical and rhetorical education.
Schoedel‘Philosophy and Rhetoric in Irenaeus’31. The following paragraphs indicate that Schoedel is mainly questioning in this last point Irenaeus’ success in supporting a proposition. He writes for instance ‘Irenaeus’ partial and undeveloped answers are never to be separated from their polemical framework’ (p. 32).
Sextus EmpiricusAgainst the Professors3.3-4. Unless otherwise noted the text and translation of Sextus comes from Sextus Empiricus in Four Volumes (lcl; trans. R.G. Bury; Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1933-59). My presentation of Sextus closely follows the work of W. Trimpi ‘The Ancient Hypothesis of Fiction: An Essay on the Origins of Literary Theory’ Traditio 2 (1971) 1-78 here 21-22.
R.M. GrantIrenaeus of Lyons47-8. For a more thorough sense of the term’s breadth see: D. Holwerda ‘Zur szenisch-technischen Bedeutung des Wortes ὑπόθεσις’ pp. 173-98 in Miscellanea tragica in honorem J.C. Kamerbeek (eds. J.M. Bremer et al.; Amsterdam: A. Hakkert 1976); R. Kassel ‘Hypothesis’ pp. 53-9 in σxολια: Studia ad criticam interpretationemque textuum Graecorum et ad historiam iuris Graceo-Romani pertinentia viro doctissimo D. Holwerda oblata (eds. W.J. Aerts et al.; Groningen: E. Forsten 1985); and R. Meijering Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia (Groningen: E. Forsten 1987) 105-33.
PolybiusHistories1.2.1; see Grant Irenaeus of Lyons 47. R. Nünlist likewise reminds us that hypothesis is the most common word for ‘subject-matter’ in ancient literary criticism (The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011] 24n.5).
BriggmanIrenaeus and the Holy Spirit173-81. Norris approaches this understanding of the relationship of God to his economy when he writes ‘There can it seems be no “going beyond” this hypothesis but only ‘inquiry into the mystery and the economy of God that is’ (2.28.1)’ (‘Theology and Language’ 294). The implication of this statement is that the mystery of God is the end of the divine economy articulated in the hypothesis of Scripture.
K. EdenHermeneutics and the Rhetorical Tradition: Chapters in the Ancient Legacy & Its Humanist Reception (New Haven and London: Yale University Press1997) esp. 7-40; and ‘Economy in the Hermeneutics of Late Antiquity’ in Reconfiguring the Relation Rhetoric/Hermeneutics ed. George Pullman Studies in the Literary Imagination 28.2 (1995) 13-26. As the notes indicate the following discussion draws heavily upon Eden’s work. However see also: Meijering Literary and Rhetorical Theories 134-200; and Nünlist Ancient Critic 24.
Eden‘Economy in the Hermeneutics of Late Antiquity’14; and Hermeneutics and the Rhetorical Tradition 42. In the latter work Eden explains that a text may be read in light of either the historical or textual context (pp. 29-41); this study is primarily interested in the textual context.