A Stylometric Analysis of the Mar Saba Letter Attributed to Clement of Alexandria
In: Vigiliae ChristianaeSearch for other papers by Enrico Tuccinardi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Since the publication of Clement’s letter to Theodore, discovered by Morton Smith at Mar Saba, there has been a great deal of controversy surrounding its authenticity.
The main aim of the present paper is to weigh the linguistic evidence for and against Clementine authorship of the letter, also checking its alleged excessively Clementine nature in an objective manner, using a profile-based stylometric technique for authorship verification which has proven to be a valuable tool for text of relatively small size.
The outcomes of the analysis tend to attribute the disputed letter to Clement but they also show its hyper-Clementine quality. Is this due to a forger, deliberately trying to imitate Clement’s style or is it instead a feature characteristic of the epistolary style of Clement? Regrettably without further samples of Clement’s letters to be used as terms of comparison it seems not possible to safely answer this question.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 760 | 150 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 66 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 120 | 5 | 0 |
A Stylometric Analysis of the Mar Saba Letter Attributed to Clement of Alexandria
In: Vigiliae ChristianaeSearch for other papers by Enrico Tuccinardi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Since the publication of Clement’s letter to Theodore, discovered by Morton Smith at Mar Saba, there has been a great deal of controversy surrounding its authenticity.
The main aim of the present paper is to weigh the linguistic evidence for and against Clementine authorship of the letter, also checking its alleged excessively Clementine nature in an objective manner, using a profile-based stylometric technique for authorship verification which has proven to be a valuable tool for text of relatively small size.
The outcomes of the analysis tend to attribute the disputed letter to Clement but they also show its hyper-Clementine quality. Is this due to a forger, deliberately trying to imitate Clement’s style or is it instead a feature characteristic of the epistolary style of Clement? Regrettably without further samples of Clement’s letters to be used as terms of comparison it seems not possible to safely answer this question.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 760 | 150 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 66 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 120 | 5 | 0 |
