In the scholarly discussion on the dating of the Acta Carpi, two main proposals were hitherto formed: either II or III c. CE. The article argues that the earlier dating is probable. The Acta Carpi show many parallels with the Martyrium Polycarpi which can be best explained by a direct relationship between the two texts. Since the Acta Carpi betray more archaic features than the Martyrium Polycarpi, which in light of recent studies should be dated to the end of the second century, it is inferred that the Acta Carpi were written in the II c. CE, most probably in the years 166–168.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 381 | 58 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 37 | 2 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 96 | 8 | 3 |
In the scholarly discussion on the dating of the Acta Carpi, two main proposals were hitherto formed: either II or III c. CE. The article argues that the earlier dating is probable. The Acta Carpi show many parallels with the Martyrium Polycarpi which can be best explained by a direct relationship between the two texts. Since the Acta Carpi betray more archaic features than the Martyrium Polycarpi, which in light of recent studies should be dated to the end of the second century, it is inferred that the Acta Carpi were written in the II c. CE, most probably in the years 166–168.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 381 | 58 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 37 | 2 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 96 | 8 | 3 |