Natural Law, Free Choice, and Moral Responsibility in the Anthropology of John Chrysostom
In: Vigiliae ChristianaeSearch for other papers by Jan R. Stenger in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In his discussion of virtue and sin, John Chrysostom makes frequent reference to the law of nature. He defines it as a moral norm given by God at the time of creation and argues that on account of it humans know what must be done and what must not be done. This article examines the role of natural law in Chrysostom’s conception of human action, focusing on the relationship between the law and human freedom. It argues that Chrysostom draws on the philosophical idea of natural law in order to explain human moral responsibility and the capacity for good deeds. By clarifying the interplay between natural law and free choice he rejects the doctrine of determinism. It is shown that the concept of natural law is also fundamental for Chrysostom’s instruction as it provides a basis for the moral reformation of the believers’ actions and behaviour.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 946 | 946 | 391 |
| Full Text Views | 31 | 31 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 129 | 129 | 6 |
Natural Law, Free Choice, and Moral Responsibility in the Anthropology of John Chrysostom
In: Vigiliae ChristianaeSearch for other papers by Jan R. Stenger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In his discussion of virtue and sin, John Chrysostom makes frequent reference to the law of nature. He defines it as a moral norm given by God at the time of creation and argues that on account of it humans know what must be done and what must not be done. This article examines the role of natural law in Chrysostom’s conception of human action, focusing on the relationship between the law and human freedom. It argues that Chrysostom draws on the philosophical idea of natural law in order to explain human moral responsibility and the capacity for good deeds. By clarifying the interplay between natural law and free choice he rejects the doctrine of determinism. It is shown that the concept of natural law is also fundamental for Chrysostom’s instruction as it provides a basis for the moral reformation of the believers’ actions and behaviour.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 946 | 946 | 391 |
| Full Text Views | 31 | 31 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 129 | 129 | 6 |
