Locus est spatium On Gerald Odonis' Quaestio de loco
In: VivariumSearch for other papers by Paul Bakker in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Sander de Boer in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article examines Gerald Odonis' view on the nature of place as found in his commentary on the Sentences (Sent. II, d. 2, qq. 3-5) and in an anonymous question (Utrum locus sit ultima superficies corporis ambientis immobile primum) extant in manuscript Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional, 4229. Both texts defend a thoroughly un-Aristotelian conception of place as three-dimensional space. Odonis not only deviates from Aristotle's definition of place as the inner surface of a surrounding body, but also from the positions of his contemporaries, including fellow Franciscans. Despite some remarkable doctrinal similarities between Odonis' view and that of Renaissance innovators like Francesco Patrizi and Bernardino Telesio, it seems unlikely that Gerald played a role in the rise of new conceptions of place in the sixteenth and seventeenth century. An edition of the anonymous Quaestio de loco is given in an appendix.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 148 | 87 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 6 | 1 | 0 |
Locus est spatium On Gerald Odonis' Quaestio de loco
In: VivariumSearch for other papers by Paul Bakker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sander de Boer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article examines Gerald Odonis' view on the nature of place as found in his commentary on the Sentences (Sent. II, d. 2, qq. 3-5) and in an anonymous question (Utrum locus sit ultima superficies corporis ambientis immobile primum) extant in manuscript Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional, 4229. Both texts defend a thoroughly un-Aristotelian conception of place as three-dimensional space. Odonis not only deviates from Aristotle's definition of place as the inner surface of a surrounding body, but also from the positions of his contemporaries, including fellow Franciscans. Despite some remarkable doctrinal similarities between Odonis' view and that of Renaissance innovators like Francesco Patrizi and Bernardino Telesio, it seems unlikely that Gerald played a role in the rise of new conceptions of place in the sixteenth and seventeenth century. An edition of the anonymous Quaestio de loco is given in an appendix.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 148 | 87 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 6 | 1 | 0 |
