C. Jourdain, “Sextus et la philosophie scolastique,” Journal Général de l’Instruction Publique (Paris, 1858), reprinted in his Excursions historiques et philosophiques à travers le moyenâge (Paris, 1888), 199-217; in the following I quote according to the first edition.

C. Jourdain, “Sextus et la philosophie scolastique,” Journal Général de l’Instruction Publique (Paris, 1858), reprinted in his Excursions historiques et philosophiques à travers le moyenâge (Paris, 1888), 199-217; in the following I quote according to the first edition.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Jourdain, “Sextus et la philosophie scolastique,” 19.

Jourdain, “Sextus et la philosophie scolastique,” 19.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

H. Mutschmann, “Die Überlieferung der Schriften des Sextus Empiricus,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 64 (1909), 244-283 and 478.

H. Mutschmann, “Die Überlieferung der Schriften des Sextus Empiricus,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 64 (1909), 244-283 and 478.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

W. Cavini, “Appunti sulla prima diffusione in occidente delle opere di Sesto Empirico,” Medioevo: Rivista di storia della filosofia medievale 3 (1977), 1-20.

W. Cavini, “Appunti sulla prima diffusione in occidente delle opere di Sesto Empirico,” Medioevo: Rivista di storia della filosofia medievale 3 (1977), 1-20.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Floridi, Sextus Empiricus, 63-64.

Floridi, Sextus Empiricus, 63-64.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Jourdain, “Sextus et la philosophie scolastique,” 17.

Jourdain, “Sextus et la philosophie scolastique,” 17.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

C.B. Schmitt, “The Rediscovery of Ancient Skepticism in Modern Times,” in The Skeptical Tradition, ed. M.F. Burnyeat (Berkeley, 1983), 225-251, at 227; an earlier version of this study appeared in Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 27 (1972), 363-384.

C.B. Schmitt, “The Rediscovery of Ancient Skepticism in Modern Times,” in The Skeptical Tradition, ed. M.F. Burnyeat (Berkeley, 1983), 225-251, at 227; an earlier version of this study appeared in Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 27 (1972), 363-384.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

H. Mutschmann, “Zur Übersetzertätigkeit des Nicolaus von Rhegium. Zu Paris lat. 14700,” Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 31 (1911), 691-693.

H. Mutschmann, “Zur Übersetzertätigkeit des Nicolaus von Rhegium. Zu Paris lat. 14700,” Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 31 (1911), 691-693.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cf., e.g., Cavini, “Appunti sulla prima diffusione,” 2; Schmitt, “The Rediscovery of Ancient Skepticism,” 243, n. 6; M. Frede, “A Medieval Source of Modern Scepticism,” in Gedankenzeichen. Festschrit für Klaus Oehler zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. R. Claussen and R. Daube-Schackat (Tübingen, 1988), 65-70, at 65; Floridi, Sextus Empiricus, 67-68.

Cf., e.g., Cavini, “Appunti sulla prima diffusione,” 2; Schmitt, “The Rediscovery of Ancient Skepticism,” 243, n. 6; M. Frede, “A Medieval Source of Modern Scepticism,” in Gedankenzeichen. Festschrit für Klaus Oehler zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. R. Claussen and R. Daube-Schackat (Tübingen, 1988), 65-70, at 65; Floridi, Sextus Empiricus, 67-68.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mutschmann, “Zur Übersetzungstätigkeit des Nicolaus von Rhegium,” 692.

Mutschmann, “Zur Übersetzungstätigkeit des Nicolaus von Rhegium,” 692.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See Frede, “A Medieval Source of Modern Scepticism,” 65.

See Frede, “A Medieval Source of Modern Scepticism,” 65.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See Floridi, Sextus Empiricus, 67-68.

See Floridi, Sextus Empiricus, 67-68.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See Galenus, Opera quarta impressio ornatissima, pars I et IIa, cum praefatione Rustici Placentini (Pavia: Giacomo Pocatela, 1515). (I collated from the exemplar at the Bibliothèque Publique et Universitaire in Geneva [= Geneva, bpu Nf 49].) On the transmission of this text, cf. H. Diels, Doxographi Graeci (Berlin, 1879), 235-236. Without further study I assume here that the ascription of the translation to Niccolò in the explicit is trustworthy. The characteristic close fit to the Greek, however, is not always observed, so there may be room for doubt.

See Galenus, Opera quarta impressio ornatissima, pars I et IIa, cum praefatione Rustici Placentini (Pavia: Giacomo Pocatela, 1515). (I collated from the exemplar at the Bibliothèque Publique et Universitaire in Geneva [= Geneva, bpu Nf 49].) On the transmission of this text, cf. H. Diels, Doxographi Graeci (Berlin, 1879), 235-236. Without further study I assume here that the ascription of the translation to Niccolò in the explicit is trustworthy. The characteristic close fit to the Greek, however, is not always observed, so there may be room for doubt.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cf. Gonzálvez Ruiz, Hombres y libros de Toledo, 477-478. He was misled by the catalogue of Millás Vallicrosa in attributing the Outlines to Aulus Gellius.

Cf. Gonzálvez Ruiz, Hombres y libros de Toledo, 477-478. He was misled by the catalogue of Millás Vallicrosa in attributing the Outlines to Aulus Gellius.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cf. item 55 in the list of 1280.

Cf. C. Burnett, “Stephen of Messina and the Translation of Astrological Texts from Greek in the Time of Manfred,” in Translating at the Court, ed. De Leemans, 123-132. The note on f. 225ra says “Hec proposiciones electe de astronomia que misse fuerunt Manffredo Regi Sicilie.”

Cf. C. Burnett, “Stephen of Messina and the Translation of Astrological Texts from Greek in the Time of Manfred,” in Translating at the Court, ed. De Leemans, 123-132. The note on f. 225ra says “Hec proposiciones electe de astronomia que misse fuerunt Manffredo Regi Sicilie.”)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cf. Cavini, “Appunti sulla prima diffussione,” 3. That the document can hardly be counted as an original is clear from the missing marks of authenticity. It is more difficult to decide whether it was a draft or a copy.

Cf. Cavini, “Appunti sulla prima diffussione,” 3. That the document can hardly be counted as an original is clear from the missing marks of authenticity. It is more difficult to decide whether it was a draft or a copy.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cf. Hernández and Linehan, The Mozarabic Cardinal, 154.

Cf. Hernández and Linehan, The Mozarabic Cardinal, 154.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See C. Flüeler, “Politischer Aristotelismus im Mittelalter. Einleitung,” Vivarium 40 (2002), 1-13, with the following hint at 9-10: “Auch hat Petrus nicht nur auf gängiges Schulwissen und Florilegien zurückgegriffen, sondern er zögerte nicht, auf seltene Quellen zurückzugreifen. So finden wir z. Bsp. in seinem Quaestionenkommentar bei der Frage, ob Inzest erlaubt werden könne, das bisher einzig bekannte Zitat aus der mittelalterlichen Übersetzung der pyrrhonischen Skepsis von Sextus Empiricus (Paris, bn, lat. 16089, f. 185ra und Bologna bu ms. 1625, f. 64rb mit Verweis auf ph iii 205).” (“f. 185ra” must be a misprint for “f. 285ra.”) An anonymous referee pointed out to me that Flüeler was indeed preceded by Conor Martin in his dissertation The Commentaries on the ‘Politics’ of Aristotle in the Late Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries, with Reference to the Thought and Political Life of the Time (unpublished PhD dissertation, Oxford University, 1949), 124; for the date of composition see ibid., 89.

See C. Flüeler, “Politischer Aristotelismus im Mittelalter. Einleitung,” Vivarium 40 (2002), 1-13, with the following hint at 9-10: “Auch hat Petrus nicht nur auf gängiges Schulwissen und Florilegien zurückgegriffen, sondern er zögerte nicht, auf seltene Quellen zurückzugreifen. So finden wir z. Bsp. in seinem Quaestionenkommentar bei der Frage, ob Inzest erlaubt werden könne, das bisher einzig bekannte Zitat aus der mittelalterlichen Übersetzung der pyrrhonischen Skepsis von Sextus Empiricus (Paris, bn, lat. 16089, f. 185ra und Bologna bu ms. 1625, f. 64rb mit Verweis auf ph iii 205).” (“f. 185ra” must be a misprint for “f. 285ra.”) An anonymous referee pointed out to me that Flüeler was indeed preceded by Conor Martin in his dissertation The Commentaries on the ‘Politics’ of Aristotle in the Late Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries, with Reference to the Thought and Political Life of the Time (unpublished PhD dissertation, Oxford University, 1949), 124; for the date of composition see ibid., 89.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation