A Fourteenth-Century Scholastic Dispute on Astrological Interrogations
In: VivariumSearch for other papers by C. Philipp E. Nothaft in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article examines and edits an anonymous text from the late 1330s (Quesitum fuit utrum per interrogationes …), which was written to refute the arguments presented in a lost quaestio disputata by an unknown Parisian philosopher. At the heart of this scholastic dispute was the question whether the astrological branch known as interrogations was an effective and legitimate means of predicting the future. The philosopher’s negative answers to this question as well as the rebuttals preserved in our anonymous text offer valuable new insights into the debate over astrology that raged at the University of Paris during the fourteenth century. Besides arguing at length for the internal coherence and philosophical soundness of interrogations, the text contains a bold defence against the Augustinian view that astrologers consort with demons. This defence was later rebutted as part of an anti-astrological polemic by the astronomer Heinrich Selder, who is known to have studied in Paris during the 1370s.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Albert the Great (Pseudo-), Speculum astronomiae, eds. S. Caroti, M. Pereira, S. Zamponi and P. Zambelli. In P. Zambelli, The Speculum astronomiae and Its Enigma: Astrology, Theology and Science in Albertus Magnus and His Contemporaries (Dordrecht, 1992), 208–272.
-
Albumasar, Liber introductorii maioris ad scientiam judiciorum astrorum, ed. R. Lemay. 8 vols. (Naples, 1995–1996).
-
Aristotle, Periermenias, trans. Guillelmus de Moerbeka, ed. L. Minio-Paluello. Aristoteles latinus 2/1 (Bruges, 1965).
-
Auctoritates Aristotelis, ed. J. Hamesse, Les Auctoritates Aristotelis : un florilège médiéval. Étude historique et édition critique (Leuven, 1974).
-
Augustine, De civitate Dei, eds. B. Dombart and A. Kalb. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 47 (Turnhout, 1955).
-
Decretales Gregorii IX, ed. E. Friedberg. In Corpus Juris Canonici, eds. E. Friedberg and E. Richter. 2 vols. (Leipzig, 1879–1881), 2: 1–928.
-
Gerard of Feltre, Summa de astris III. Città del Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, MS Vat. lat. 3097, 23r–50v.
-
Guido Bonatti, Tractatus astronomie (Augsburg, 1491).
-
Guillelmus Anglicus, De urina non visa, ed. L. Moulinier-Brogi, Guillaume l’Anglais, le frondeur de l’uroscopie médiévale (XIIIe siècle) (Geneva, 2011).
-
Haly Abenragel, De iudiciis astrorum (Basel, 1551).
-
Haly Abenrudian, Commentarium in Quadripartitum Ptolemaei, trans. Aegidius de Tebaldis. In Liber Quadripartiti Ptholemei etc. (Venice, 1493), 2 r–106 v.
-
John of Saxony, Scriptum super Alchabitium. In Libellus Ysagogicus Abdilazi, id est servi gloriosi Dei, qui dicitur Alchabitius ad magisterium iuditiorum astrorum (Venice, 1485), sigs. ee4r–mm10r.
-
Leopold of Austria, Compilatio de astrorum scientia (Augsburg, 1489).
-
Pierre d’Ailly, Imago mundi et tractatus alii (Leuven, 1477–1483).
-
Ptolemaeus (Pseudo-), Centiloquium, versio “Mundanorum.” Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, MS lat. 16204, 553a–584b.
-
Ptolemaeus, Quadripartitum, trans. Aegidius de Tebaldis. In Liber Quadripartiti Ptholemei etc. (Venice, 1493), 2 r–104 v.
-
Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae II–II, qq. 57–122, eds. Fratres Praedicatores. Opera omnia 9 (Rome, 1897).
-
Allamandy, M.-É., et al., eds. Les Pères de l’Église et l’astrologie (Paris, 2003).
-
Bailey, M. D. Fearful Spirits, Reasoned Follies: The Boundaries of Superstition in Late Medieval Europe (Ithaca, NY, 2013).
-
Boudet, J.-P. “Astrology between Rational Science and Divine Inspiration: The Pseudo- Ptolemy’s Centiloquium.” In Dialogues among Books in Medieval Western Magic and Divination, eds. S. Rapisarda and E. Niblaeus (Florence, 2014), 49–75.
-
Boudet, J.-P. Entre science et nigromance: astrologie, divination et magie dans l’Occident médiéval (XIIe–XVe siècle) (Paris, 2006).
-
Boudet, J.-P. “Expertise et contre-expertise: la consultation astrologique de Robert de Mauvoisin, archevêque d’Aix, en 1316.” In Experts et expertise au Moyen Âge: consilium quaeritur a perito; XLIIe Congrès de la SHMESP (Oxford, 31 mars–3 avril 2011) (Paris, 2012), 99–114.
-
Boudet, J.-P. “Naissance et conception: autour de la proposition 51 du Centiloquium attribué à Ptolémée.” In De l’homme, de la nature et du monde: mélanges d’histoire des sciences médiévales offerts à Danielle Jacquart, eds. N. Weill-Parot, M. Ausécache, J. Chandelier, L. Moulinier-Brogi and M. Nicoud (Geneva, 2019), 165–178.
-
Boudet, J.-P. “The Archbishop and the Astrologers: A [sic] Robert de Mauvoisin’s questio in 1316.” In Astrologers and their Clients in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, eds. W. Deimann and D. Juste (Cologne, 2015), 43–61.
-
Boudet, J.-P. “The Medieval Latin Versions of Pseudo-Ptolemy’s Centiloquium: A Survey.” In Ptolemy’s Science of the Stars in the Middle Ages, eds. D. Juste, B. van Dalen, D. N. Hasse and C. Burnett (Turnhout, 2020), 283–304.
-
Boudet, J.-P., and J. Théry. “Le procès de Jean XXII contre l’archevêque d’Aix Robert de Mauvoisin (1317–1318): astrologie, arts prohibés et politique.” Cahiers de Fanjeaux 45 (2012), 159–236.
-
Burnett, C. “Al-Qabīṣī’s Introduction to Astrology: From Courtly Entertainment to University Textbook.” In Studies in the History of Culture and Society: A Tribute to Gad Freudenthal, eds. R. Fontaine, R. Glasner, R. Leicht and G. Veltri (Leiden, 2011), 43–69.
-
Burnett, C. “De meliore homine: ‘Umar ibn al-Farrukhān al Ṭabarī on Interrogations: A Fourth Translation by Salio of Padua?” In Adorare caelestia, gubernare terrena: atti del colloquio internazionale in onore di Paolo Lucentini (Napoli, 6–7 Novembre 2007), eds. P. Arfé, I. Caiazzo and A. Sannino (Turnhout, 2011), 295–325.
-
Burnett, C. “Richard de Fournival and the Speculum astronomiae.” In Richard de Fournival et les sciences au XIIIe siècle, eds. J. Ducos and C. Lucken (Florence, 2018), 339–348.
-
Burton, D. Nicole Oresme’s De visione stellarum (On Seeing the Stars): A Critical Edition of Oresme’s Treatise on Optics and Atmospheric Refraction, with an Introduction, Commentary, and English Translation (Leiden, 2007).
-
Calcoen, R. Inventaire des manuscrits scientifiques de la Bibliothèque Royale de Belgique. 3 vols. (Brussels, 1965–1975).
-
Carey, H. M. “Judicial Astrology in Theory and Practice in Later Medieval Europe.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (2010), 90–98.
-
Caroti, S. “Astrologie im Mittelalter: Von Superstitio zur Scientia astrorum.” In Mantik, Schicksal und Freiheit im Mittelalter, ed. L. Sturlese (Cologne, 2011), 13–31.
-
Caroti, S. “La critica contro l’astrologia di Nicole Oresme e la sua influenza nel Medioevo e nel Rinascimento.” Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei: Memorie della Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, 8th ser., 23 (1979), 545–685.
-
Caroti, S. “Nicole Oresme’s Polemic against Astrology in His ‘Quodlibeta’.” In Astrology, Science and Society: Historical Essays, ed. P. Curry (Woodbridge, 1987), 75–95.
-
Caroti, S., M. Pereira, S. Zamponi and P. Zambelli, eds. Alberto Magno: Speculum astronomiae (Pisa, 1977).
-
Chabás, J. Computational Astronomy in the Middle Ages: Sets of Astronomical Tables in Latin (Madrid, 2019).
-
Coopland, G. W. Nicole Oresme and the Astrologers: A Study of His Livre de divinacions (Cambridge, MA, 1952).
-
Dasen, V. “Naître jumeaux: un destin ou deux?” In L’embryon: formation et animation; antiquité grecque et latine, tradition hébraïque, chrétienne et islamique, eds. L. Brisson, M.-H. Congourdeau and J.-L. Solère (Paris, 2008), 108–122.
-
Dijksterhuis, E. J. The Mechanization of the World Picture, trans. C. Dikshoorn (Oxford, 1961).
-
Dykes, B. N. Works of Sahl and Māshā’allāh (Minneapolis, 2008).
-
Gaida, M. Encounters with Alcabitius: Reading Arabic Astrology in Premodern Europe, Dissertation (University of Oklahoma, 2017).
-
Ghisalberti, A., s. v. “Bardi, Roberto.” In Dizionario biografico degli Italiani, vol. 6, Baratteri–Bartolozzi (Rome, 1964), 31.
-
Hackett, J. “Albert the Great and the Speculum astronomiae: The State of Research at the Beginning of the 21st Century.” In A Companion to Albert the Great: Theology, Philosophy, and the Sciences, ed. I. M. Resnick (Leiden, 2013), 437–449.
-
Hand, R. S. The Use of Military Astrology in Late Medieval Italy: The Textual Evidence, Dissertation (The Catholic University of America, 2014).
-
Harmening, D. Superstitio: Überlieferungs- und theoriegeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur kirchlich-theologischen Aberglaubensliteratur des Mittelalters (Berlin, 1979).
-
Hasse, D. N. Success and Suppression: Arabic Sciences and Philosophy in the Renaissance (Cambridge, MA, 2016).
-
Hegedus, T. Early Christianity and Ancient Astrology (New York, 2007).
-
Hendrix, S. E. How Albert the Great’s Speculum astronomiae Was Interpreted and Used by Four Centuries of Readers: A Study in Late Medieval Medicine, Astronomy, and Astrology (Lewiston, NY, 2010).
-
Hersperger, P. Kirche, Magie und “Aberglaube”: Superstitio in der Kanonistik des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts (Cologne, 2010).
-
Hughes, B. B., ed. Jordanus de Nemore: De numeris datis: A Critical Edition and Translation (Berkeley, CA, 1981).
-
Juste, D. “MS Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, n.a.l. 1893” (update: 30.03.2018). Ptolemaeus Arabus et Latinus. Manuscripts, URL = <http://ptolemaeus.badw.de/ms/570>.
-
Juste, D. “Pseudo-Ptolemy, Iudicia” (update: 29.07.2020). Ptolemaeus Arabus et Latinus. Works, URL = <http://ptolemaeus.badw.de/work/63>.
-
Juste, D. “The Impact of Arabic Sources on European Astrology: Some Facts and Numbers.” Micrologus 24 (2016), 173–194.
-
Lejbowicz, M. “Chronologie des écrits anti-astrologiques de Nicole Oresme: étude sur un cas de scepticisme dans la deuxième moitié du XIVe s.” In Autour de Nicole Oresme, ed. J. Quillet (Paris, 1990), 119–176.
-
Lemay, R. “The Teaching of Astronomy in Medieval Universities, Principally at Paris in the Fourteenth Century.” Manuscripta 20 (1976), 197–217.
-
Markus, R. A. “Augustine on Magic: A Neglected Semiotic Theory.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 40 (1994), 375–388.
-
Marxreiter, B., ed. Bern von Reichenau: De nigromantia seu divinatione daemonum contemnenda. Edition und Untersuchung (Wiesbaden, 2016).
-
Moulinier-Brogi, L. Guillaume l’Anglais, le frondeur de l’uroscopie médiévale (XIIIe siècle): édition commentée et traduction du “De urina non visa” (Geneva, 2011).
-
Niblaeus, E. “Arguing Divination by the Book: The Latin Fathers and Scriptural Categories of Foretelling.” In Dialogues among Books in Medieval Western Magic and Divination, eds. S. Rapisarda and E. Niblaeus (Florence, 2014), 33–47.
-
Nothaft, C. P. E. A Fourteenth-Century Chronologer and Critic of Astrology: Heinrich Selder’s Treatise on the Time of the Lord’s Annunciation, Nativity, and Passion (Oxford, forthcoming).
-
Nothaft, C. P. E. “A Medieval European Value for the Circumference of the Earth.” Early Science and Medicine 25 (2020), 135–151.
-
Nothaft, C. P. E. “Glorious Science or ‘Dead Dog’? Jean de Jandun and the Quarrel over Astrology in Fourteenth-Century Paris.” Vivarium 57 (2019), 51–101.
-
Nothaft, C. P. E. “Vanitas vanitatum et super omnia vanitas: The Astronomer Heinrich Selder and a Newly Discovered Fourteenth-Century Critique of Astrology.” Erudition and the Republic of Letters 1 (2016), 261–304.
-
Paravicini Bagliani, A. Le Speculum Astronomiae, une énigme? Enquête sur les manuscrits (Florence, 2001).
-
Poulle, E. “Les astronomes parisiens au XIVe siècle et l’astronomie alphonsine.” In Histoire littéraire de la France, 43/1 (Paris, 2005), 1–54.
-
Poulle, E. “The Alfonsine Tables and Alfonso X of Castile.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 19 (1988), 97–113.
-
Pruckner, H. Studien zu den astrologischen Schriften des Heinrich von Langenstein (Leipzig, 1933).
-
Rapisarda, S. “From the Tractatus contra astronomos judiciarios (1349) to the Livre de divinacions (1356): Nicole Oresme Lost in Translation.” In El saber i les llengües vernacles a l’època de Llull i Eiximenis: estudis ICREA sobre vernacularització, eds. A. Alberni, L. Badia, L. Cifuentes and A. Fidora (Barcelona, 2012), 231–255.
-
Rapisarda, S., ed. Nicole Oresme: Contro la divinazione; consigli antiastrologici al re di Francia (1356) (Rome, 2009).
-
Roy, B. “Richard de Fournival, auteur du Speculum astronomie?” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 67 (2000), 159–180.
-
Rutkin, H. D. “Astrology and Magic.” In A Companion to Albert the Great: Theology, Philosophy, and the Sciences, ed. I. M. Resnick (Leiden, 2013), 451–505.
-
Rutkin, H. D. “Is Astrology a Type of Divination? Thomas Aquinas, the Index of Prohibited Books, and the Construction of a Legitimate Astrology in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.” International Journal of Divination and Prognostication 1 (2019), 36–74.
-
Rutkin, H. D. Sapientia Astrologica: Astrology, Magic and Natural Knowledge, ca. 1250–1800. Vol. 1: Medieval Structures (1250–1500): Conceptual, Institutional, Socio-Political, Theologico-Religious and Cultural (Cham, Switzerland, 2019).
-
Sela, S., ed. Abraham Ibn Ezra Latinus on Elections and Interrogations (Leiden, 2020).
-
Sela, S., ed. Abraham Ibn Ezra on Elections, Interrogations, and Medical Astrology (Leiden, 2011).
-
Sela, S., ed. Abraham Ibn Ezra on Nativities and Continuous Horoscopy (Leiden, 2013).
-
Sela, S. “Calculating Birth: Abraham Ibn Ezra’s Role in the Creation and Diffusion of the Trutina Hermetis.” In Pregnancy and Childbirth in the Premodern World: European and Middle Eastern Cultures, from Late Antiquity to the Renaissance, eds. C. Gislon Dopfel, A. Foscati and C. Burnett (Turnhout, 2019), 79–106.
-
Serra, S. Nicole Oresme: exigences scientifiques et project politique, Dissertation (Université Paris-Sorbonne, 2015).
-
Silvestre, H. “Incipits des traités médiévaux de sciences expérimentales dans les mss latins de Bruxelles.” Scriptorium 5 (1951), 145–160.
-
Smithuis, R. “Abraham Ibn Ezra’s Astrological Works in Hebrew and Latin: New Discoveries and Exhaustive Listing.” Aleph 6 (2006), 239–338.
-
Sorokina, M. Les sphères, les astres et les théologiens: l’influence céleste entre science et foi dans les commentaires des Sentences (v. 1200–v. 1340) (Turnhout, 2021).
-
Sorokina, M. “Un tournant dans la critique de l’astrologie? La Summa de astris de Gérard de Feltre.” Philosophical Readings 7 (2015), 71–92.
-
Thomas, A. “Extraits des Archives du Vatican pour servir à l’histoire littéraire du Moyen-Âge (suite et fin).” Mélanges de l’École française de Rome 4 (1884), 9–52.
-
Thorndike, L. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. 8 vols. (New York, 1923–1958).
-
Thorndike, L. “A Hitherto Unnoticed Criticism of Astrology: Liber de reprobatione iudiciorum astrologiae.” Isis 31 (1939), 68–78.
-
Thorndike, L. “Traditional Medieval Tracts Concerning Engraved Astrological Images.” In Mélanges Auguste Pelzer (Leuven, 1947), 216–274.
-
Thorndike, L. “Vatican Latin Manuscripts in the History of Science and Medicine.” Isis 13 (1929), 53–102.
-
Thorndike, L., and P. Kibre. A Catalogue of Incipits of Mediaeval Scientific Writings in Latin, rev. ed. (London, 1963).
-
Véronèse, J. “Contre la divination et la magie à la cour: trois traités adressés à des grands aux XIVe et XVe siècles.” Micrologus 16 (2008), 405–431.
-
Weill-Parot, N. “La Biblionomia de Richard de Fournival, le Speculum astronomiae et le secret.” In Richard de Fournival et les sciences au XIIIe siècle, eds. J. Ducos and C. Lucken (Florence, 2018), 323–338.
-
Weill-Parot, N. Les “images astrologiques” au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance: spéculations intellectuelles et pratiques magiques (XIIe–XVe siècle) (Paris, 2002).
-
Zambelli, P. The Speculum astronomiae and Its Enigma: Astrology, Theology and Science in Albertus Magnus and His Contemporaries (Dordrecht, 1992).
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 740 | 130 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 83 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 188 | 26 | 0 |
A Fourteenth-Century Scholastic Dispute on Astrological Interrogations
In: VivariumSearch for other papers by C. Philipp E. Nothaft in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article examines and edits an anonymous text from the late 1330s (Quesitum fuit utrum per interrogationes …), which was written to refute the arguments presented in a lost quaestio disputata by an unknown Parisian philosopher. At the heart of this scholastic dispute was the question whether the astrological branch known as interrogations was an effective and legitimate means of predicting the future. The philosopher’s negative answers to this question as well as the rebuttals preserved in our anonymous text offer valuable new insights into the debate over astrology that raged at the University of Paris during the fourteenth century. Besides arguing at length for the internal coherence and philosophical soundness of interrogations, the text contains a bold defence against the Augustinian view that astrologers consort with demons. This defence was later rebutted as part of an anti-astrological polemic by the astronomer Heinrich Selder, who is known to have studied in Paris during the 1370s.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 740 | 130 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 83 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 188 | 26 | 0 |