Medieval theologians commonly held that angels are subordinated one to the other. However, they did not agree on the foundations and nature of this order of subjection. This article traces the trajectory of the theological discussion on the nature of the angelic prelacy. While there is extensive scholarly literature on medieval theologians’ conceptions of the angelic hierarchy, there is next to nothing on their views of angelic prelacy. This article suggests that one of the questions that drives the route taken by the discussions on angelic prelacy is a tension internal to the very idea of angelic prelacy. To be a subject involves some degree of unfreedom. Yet it seemed unsuitable to medieval theologians to attribute unfreedom to angels. A satisfactory picture of angelic prelacy had to posit a form of subjection that did not imply any loss of liberty for the subject angels.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Albert the Great, Commentarii iniiSententiarum, ed. A. Borgnet. Opera omnia 27 (Paris, 1894).
Albert the Great, Commentarii inivSententiarum (dist. xxiii–l), ed. A. Borgnet. Opera omnia 30 (Paris, 1894).
Albert the Great, Enarrationes in Joannem, eds. A. Borgnet and E. Borgnet. Opera omnia 24 (Paris, 1899).
Albert the Great, Summa theologiae. Pars II, qq. I–LXVII, ed. A. Borgnet. Opera omnia 32 (Paris, 1895).
Albert the Great, Super Dionysium De caelesti hierarchia, eds. P. Simon and W. Kübel (Münster, 1993).
Alexander of Hales, Summa theologica [Summa Halensis], Liber II, Pars 1, eds. PP. Collegii S. Bonaventurae (Quaracchi, 1928).
Bernard of Clairvaux, De gratia et libero arbitrio, eds. J. Leclercq and H.-M. Rochais. Sancti Bernardi opera 3 (Rome, 1963), 165–203.
Bonaventure, In secundum librum Sententiarum, eds. PP. Collegii a S. Bonaventura. Opera omnia 2. (Quaracchi, 1885).
Bonaventure, Quaestiones disputatae de perfectione evangelica, eds. PP. Collegii a S. Bonaventura. Opera omnia 5 (Quaracchi, 1891), 115–198.
Gregory the Great, Homiliae in evangelia, ed. R. Étaix. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 141 (Turnhout, 1999).
Hannibaldus of Hannibaldi, Commentarius in quatuor libros Sententiarum (Basel, 1492).
Hannibaldus of Hannibaldi, Commentarius Posterior super Libros Sententiarum, ed. J. Nicolai (Paris, 1660) (misattributed to Thomas Aquinas).
Haymo of Auxerre, In divi Pauli epistolas omnes interpretatio (Cologne, 1589).
Hugh of Saint-Cher, Opera omnia in universum vetus et novum testamentum. 8 vols. (Lyons, 1645).
Peter Lombard, Collectanea in Epistolas Pauli (Paris, 1543).
Peter Lombard, The Sentences, 2: On Creation, trans. G. Silano (Toronto, 2008).
Peter Lombard, Sententiae inivlibris distinctae, vol. 1/2: Liber I et II (Grottaferrata, 1971).
Plato, Timaeus a Calcidio translatus commentarioque instructus, ed. J. H. Waszink. Plato latinus 4 (London, 1962).
Thomas Aquinas, Scriptum super secundum librum Sententiarum, ed. P. Mandonnet (Paris, 1929).
Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiaei, qq. 50–119, eds. Fratres Praedicatores. Opera omnia 5 (Rome, 1889).
Ulrich of Strasbourg, De summo bono. Liber IV, tract. 1–2,7, ed. S. Pieperhoff (Hamburg, 1987).
Buc, P. L’ambiguïté du Livre: Prince, pouvoir, et peuple dans les commentaires de la Bible au Moyen Âge (Paris, 1994).
Colish, M. “Early Scholastic Angelology.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 62 (1995), 80–109.
Dettloff, W. “Das officium praelationis. Ein Beitrag aus Bonaventuras Lehre von der Kirche.” in Jus sacrum: Klaus Mörsdorf zum 60. Geburtstag, eds. A. Scheuermann and G. May (Munich, 1969), 207–229.
Doucet, V. “The History of the Problem of the Authenticity of the Summa.” Franciscan Studies 7 (1947), 26–41, 274–312.
Drogula, F. K. “Imperium, Potestas and the Pomerium in the Roman Republic.” Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 4 (2007), 419–452.
Even-Ezra, A. “The Summa Halensis: A Text in Context.” In The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context, ed. L. Schumacher (Berlin, 2020), 219–235.
Faes de Mottoni, B. “Bonaventura e le gerarchie angeliche.” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 40(1993), 312–358.
Faes de Mottoni, B. San Bonaventura e la scala di Giacobbe: Letture di angelologia (Naples, 1995).
Faes de Mottoni, B., and T. Suarez-Nani. “Hiérarchies, miracles et fonction cosmologique des anges au XIIIe siècle.” Mélanges de l’École française de Rome 114 (2002), 717–751.
Klitenic Wear, S., and J. Dillon. Dionysius the Areopagite and the Neoplatonist Tradition: Despoiling the Hellenes (Aldershot, 2007).
Luscombe, D. “Conceptions of Hierarchy before the Thirteenth Century.” In Soziale Ordnungen im Selbstverständnis des Mittelalters, ed. A. Zimmermann. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 12 (Berlin, 1979), 1–19.
Luscombe, D. “The Hierarchies in the Writings of Alan of Lille, William of Auvergne and St Bonaventure.” In Angels in Medieval Philosophical Inquiry: Their Function and Significance, eds. I. Iribarren and M. Lenz (London, 2008), 15–28.
Luscombe, D. “Hierarchy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, ed. A. S. McGrade (Cambridge, 2003), 60–72.
Luscombe, D. “Hierarchy in the Late Middle Ages: Criticism and Change.” In Political Thought and the Realities of Power in the Middle Ages, eds. J. Canning and O. G. Oexle (Göttingen, 1988), 113–126.
Luscombe, D. “Thomas Aquinas and Conceptions of Hierarchy in the Thirteenth Century.” In Thomas von Aquin, Werk und Wirkung im Licht neuerer Forschungen, ed. A. Zimmermann. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 19 (Berlin, 1988), 261–277.
McCluskey, C. “Bernard of Clairvaux on the Nature of Human Agency.” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64 (2008), 297–317.
Peiró Pérez, M. J., and M. Idoya Zorroza. “La noción de libertad como CAUSA SUI.” Caurensia 9 (2014), 435–449.
Quinn, J. F. “Chronology of St. Bonaventure.” Franciscan Studies 32 (1972), 168–186.
Roques, R. L’univers dionysien: structure hiérarchique du monde selon le Pseudo-Denys (Paris, 1954).
Schumacher, L. Divine Illumination: The History and Future of Augustine’s Theory of Knowledge (Oxford, 2011).
Schumacher, L. Early Franciscan Theology: Between Authority and Innovation (Cambridge, 2019).
Smith, L. The Glossa Ordinaria: The Making of a Medieval Bible Commentary (Leiden, 2009).
Spiering, J. A. “Liber est causa sui: Thomas Aquinas and the Maxim ‘The Free is the Cause of Itself.’” Review of Metaphysics 65 (2011), 351–376.
Vallejo, J. “Power Hierarchies in Medieval Juridical Thought. An Essay in Reinterpretation.” Ius Commune 19 (1992), 1–29.
Weber, H. P. “The Glossa Inivlibros Sententiarum by Alexander of Hales.” In Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, ed. P. Rosemann, vol. 2 (Leiden, 2010), 79–108.
Zeittafel (Chronologie nach der derzeitigem Forschungsstand). In Albertus Magnus und sein System der Wissenschaften. Schlüsseltexte in Übersetzung, eds. and trans. H. Möhle, H. Anzulewicz, M. Burger, S. Donati, R. Meyer, M. Bredenbeck and S. Bullido del Barrio (Münster, 2011), 28–31.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 295 | 153 | 29 |
Full Text Views | 81 | 17 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 162 | 49 | 3 |
Medieval theologians commonly held that angels are subordinated one to the other. However, they did not agree on the foundations and nature of this order of subjection. This article traces the trajectory of the theological discussion on the nature of the angelic prelacy. While there is extensive scholarly literature on medieval theologians’ conceptions of the angelic hierarchy, there is next to nothing on their views of angelic prelacy. This article suggests that one of the questions that drives the route taken by the discussions on angelic prelacy is a tension internal to the very idea of angelic prelacy. To be a subject involves some degree of unfreedom. Yet it seemed unsuitable to medieval theologians to attribute unfreedom to angels. A satisfactory picture of angelic prelacy had to posit a form of subjection that did not imply any loss of liberty for the subject angels.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 295 | 153 | 29 |
Full Text Views | 81 | 17 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 162 | 49 | 3 |