Sense Perception between Psychology and Elemental Physics
A Reading of Alfanus of Salerno’s Premnon physicon and Constantine the African’s Pantegni
In: VivariumSearch for other papers by María José Ortúzar Escudero in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The southern Italian translations of the second half of the eleventh century represent a turning point in the understanding of human nature in the Latin West. Their account of sense perception offers a comprehension of how the outer world, the body, and the mind interact. The interaction is based on the concepts of elements and their qualities, on the one hand, and immaterial powers of the soul, on the other. The present article investigates how this interaction, including the physiology and psychology of perception, was explained in two widely received translations: Alfanus of Salerno’s Premnon physicon and Constantine the African’s Pantegni. It also underlines the salient aspects in which these explanations differ from the Aristotelian and the Augustinian views of perception, offering to some extent a Galenic-based alternative to them.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alfanus i, Premnon physicon, ed. I. Chirico (Rome, 2011).
-
Apex phisice anonymi, eds. H. Lehmke, G. Maurach, S. Dase and A. Walter. Abhandlungen der Braunschweigischen Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft 49 (1998), 7–80.
-
Augustine, De Genesi ad litteram Librixii, ed. J. Zycha (Vienna, 1894).
-
Augustine, De libero arbitrio – Der freie Wille, ed. J. Brachtendorf (Paderborn, 2006).
-
Constantine the African, Pantegni Pars Prima Theorica, ms Den Haag, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, 73 J 6. url = https://galerij.kb.nl/kb.html#/en/liberpantegni/.
-
Constantine the African, Theorica Pantegni. Facsimile and Transcription of the Helsinki manuscript (Codex EÖ.II.14), ed. O. Kaltio (Helsinki, 2011).
-
Galen, De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis – On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato, ed. and trans. Ph. De Lacy. 3 vols. (Berlin, 1978–1984).
-
Galen, “On the Causes of Symptoms i.” In Galen: On Diseases and Symptoms, trans. I. Johnston (Cambridge, 2006), 203–235.
-
Nemesius of Emesa, De natura hominis, eds. G. Verbeke and J. R. Moncho (Leiden, 1975).
-
Nemesius [of Emesa], On the Nature of Man, trans. R. W. Sharples and P. J. van der Eijk (Liverpool, 2008).
-
Nemesius of Emesa, Premnon physicon sive peri physeos anthropou liber, ed. K. Burkhard (Leipzig, 1917).
-
Asúa, M. de. “War and Peace: Medicine and Natural Philosophy in Albert the Great.” In A Companion to Albert the Great: Theology, Philosophy, and the Sciences, ed. I. M. Resnick (Leiden, 2013), 269–297.
-
Boon, J. A. “The Body-and-Soul in Pain: Medico-Theological Debates in Late Medieval Castilian Passion Treatises.” Viator 50 (2019), 249–287.
-
Burkhard, K. “Praefatio.” In Nemesius of Emesa, Premnon physicon sive peri physeos anthropou liber, ed. K. Burkhard (Leipzig, 1917), v–xi.
-
Burnett, Ch. “Physics before the Physics: Early Translations from Arabic of Texts Concerning Nature in mss British Library, Additional 22719 and Cotton Galba E IV.” In Ch. Burnett, Arabic into Latin in the Middle Ages: The Translators and Their Intellectual and Social Context. Variorum Collected Studies (Farnham, Burlington, 2009), 53–109.
-
Burnett, Ch. “Verba Ypocratis preponderanda omnium generum metallis. Hippocrates on the Nature of Man in Salerno and Montecassino, with an Edition of the Chapter on the Elements in the Pantegni.” In La Scuola Medica Salernitana: Gli autori e i testi, eds. D. Jacquart and A. Paravicini Bagliani (Florence, 2007), 59–92.
-
Bylebyl, J. J. “The Medical Meaning of Physica.” Osiris 6 (1990), 16–41.
-
Caiazzo, I. “Filosofia della natura e fisica elementare nell’alto Medioevo.” In La conoscenza scientifica nell’alto Medioevo (Spoleto, 2020), 1059–1086.
-
Caston, V. “Perception in Ancient Greek Philosophy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception, ed. M. Matthen (Oxford, 2015), 29–50.
-
Chirico, I. “Il Prologo di Alfano al ‘De natura hominis’ di Nemesio.” Rassegna storica Salernitana 20 (2003), 9–25.
-
Eastwood, B. S. “The Elements of Vision: The Micro-Cosmology of Galenic Visual Theory according to Ḥunayn Ibn Isḥāq.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 72 (1982), 1–59.
-
Eastwood, B. S. “Galen on the Elements of Olfactory Sensation.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 124 (1981), 268–290.
-
Eijk, P. van der. “Galen on the Nature of Human Beings.” In Philosophical Themes in Galen, eds. P. Adamson, R. E. Hansberger and J. Wilberding (London, 2014), 89–134.
-
Germann, N. “Natural Philosophy in Earlier Latin Thought.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, eds. R. Pasnau and C. Van Dyke. 2 vols. (Cambridge, 2010), 1: 219–231.
-
Glenney, B., and Silva, J. F. “Introduction to Part iii.” In The Senses and the History of Philosophy, eds. J. F. Silva and B. Glenney (Abingdon, 2019), 97–105.
-
Green, C. D. “Where Did the Ventricular Localization of Mental Faculties Come From?” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 39 (2003), 131–142.
-
Green, M. H. “Gloriosissimus Galienus. Galen and Galenic Writings in the Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century Latin West.” In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Galen, eds. P. Bouras-Vallianatos and B. Zipser (Leiden, 2019), 319–342.
-
Green, M. H. “Rethinking the Manuscript Basis of Salvatore de Renzi’s Collectio Salernitana.” In La Collectio Salernitana di Salvatore de Renzi, eds. D. Jacquart and A. Paravicini Bagliani (Florence, 2009), 15–60.
-
Gregoric, P., and J. L. Fink. “Sense Perception in Aristotle and the Aristotelian Tradition.” In Forms of Representation in the Aristotelian Tradition. Volume One: Sense Perception, ed. J. Toivanen (Leiden, 2022), 15–39.
-
Guerrero Peral, Á. L., and V. de Frutos González. “Constantino el Africano.” Neurosciences and History 24 (2013), 80–87.
-
Halton, T. P. “The Five Senses in Nemesius, De Natura Hominis and Theodoret, De Providentia.” Studia patristica 20 (1987), 94–101.
-
Hankinson, R. J. “Galen and the Ontology of Powers.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2014), 951–973.
-
Hankinson, R. J. “Galen’s Anatomy of the Soul.” Phronesis 36 (1991), 197–233.
-
Hankinson, R. J. “Philosophy of Nature.” In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. R. J. Hankinson (Cambridge, 2008), 210–241.
-
Hankinson, R. J. “Substance, Element, Quality, Mixture: Galen’s Physics and his Hippocratic Inheritance.” Aitia 7 (2017). doi: 10.4000/aitia.1863.
-
Hogewind, B. F., and Hogewind, F. E. I., “‘De oculis’, a chapter on ocular anatomy by Constantinus Africanus.” Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology 126 (2022), 103–114.
-
Ierodiakonou, K. “On Galen’s Theory of Vision.” In Philosophical Themes in Galen, eds. P. Adamson, R. E. Hansberger and J. Wilberding (London, 2014), 235–247.
-
Ierodiakonou, K. “On Sense-Perception.” In Galen’s Epistemology: Experience, Reason, and Method in Ancient Medicine, ed. R. J. Hankinson and M. Havrda (Cambridge, 2022), 218–231.
-
Jacquart, D. “Aristotelian Thought in Salerno.” In A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy, ed. P. Dronke (Cambridge, 1988), 407–428.
-
Jacquart, D. “Minima in Twelfth-Century Medical Texts from Salerno.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, eds. C. H. Lüthy, J. E. Murdoch and W. R. Newman (Leiden, 2001), 39–56.
-
Jacquart, D. “La reconstruction médicale de la nature de l’homme aux xie et xiie siècles.” Revue de Synthèse 134 (2013), 445–472.
-
Jacquart, D., and F. Micheau. La médecine arabe et l’occident médiéval (Paris, 1990).
-
Johansen, T. K. Aristotle on the Sense-Organs (Cambridge, 2007).
-
Kärkkäinen, P. “Sense Perception, Theories of.” In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy, ed. H. Lagerlund (Dordrecht, 2011), 1182–1185.
-
Kärkkäinen, P. “The Senses in Philosophy and Science.” In A Cultural History of the Senses in the Middle Ages, ed. R. G. Newhauser (London, 2014), 111–132.
-
King, D. Experiencing Pain in Imperial Greek Culture (Oxford, 2017).
-
Klemm, T. Bildphysiologie. Wahrnehmung und Körper in Mittelalter und Renaissance (Berlin, 2013).
-
Kupreeva, I. “Aristotelian Dynamics in the 2nd Century Schools Debates: Galen and Alexander of Aphrodisias on Organic Powers and Movements.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 47 (2004), 71–95.
-
Kupreeva, I. “Galen’s Theory of Elements.” In Philosophical Themes in Galen, eds. P. Adamson, R. E. Hansberger and J. Wilberding (London, 2014), 153–196.
-
Kwakkel, E., and F. L. Newton. “Appendix A.” In Medicine at Monte Cassino, eds. E. Kwakkel and F. L. Newton (Turnhout, 2019), 191–194.
-
McKeon, R. “Medicine and Philosophy in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries.” The Thomist 24 (1961), 211–256.
-
Montero Cartelle, E. “Alfano y Constantino el Africano.” Revista de estudios latinos 16 (2016), 119–129.
-
Morani, M. “Index verborum quae in Nemesii De Natura hominis libro, iuxta translationem Alfani Salernitani, reperiuntur.” Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi 44/45 (1983/1985), 139–174.
-
Nawar, T. “Augustine on Active Perception, Awareness, and Representation.” Phronesis 66 (2020), 84–110.
-
Ortúzar Escudero, M. J. “Does the Mind Suffer? Living Bodies, Brain, and Pain in Alfanus of Salerno’s Premnon physicon and in Constantine the African’s Pantegni.” Open Library of Humanities 9 (2023). doi: 10.16995/olh.9069.
-
Ortúzar Escudero, M. J. “The Role of the spiritus animalis in Accounts of Perception: Medical and Philosophical Remarks from three 13th-century Encyclopedias.” Vincent of Beauvais Newsletter 42 (2018), 4–16.
-
Ortúzar Escudero, M. J. “El tacto, la piel y el alma en textos filosóficos y médicos del largo siglo xii.” In Un mundo de sensaciones. Siglosviialxvii, ed. G. Rodríguez (Mar del Plata, 2023), 125–146.
-
Perler, D. “Perception in Medieval Philosophy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception, ed. M. Matthen (Oxford, 2015), 51–65.
-
Ricklin, T. Der Traum der Philosophie im 12. Jahrhundert (Leiden, 1998).
-
Robinson, K. The Sense of Smell in the Middle Ages. A Source of Certainty (London, 2020).
-
Rocca, J. “From Doubt to Certainty: Aspects of the Conceptualisation and Interpretation of Galen’s Natural Pneuma.” In Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe, eds. M. Horstmanshoff, H. King, and C. Zittel (Leiden, 2012), 627–659.
-
Rubarth, S. “Stoic Philosophy of Mind.” In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. A Peer-Reviewed Resource. url https://iep.utm.edu/stoicmind/.
-
Russell, G. “The Anatomy of the Eye in Alī Ibn Al-ʿAbbās Al-Maǧūsī: A Textbook Case.” In Constantine the African and ʿAlī Ibn Al-ʿabbās Al-Mağūsī. The Pantegni and Related Texts, eds. D. Jacquart and Ch. Burnett (Leiden, 1994), 247–265.
-
Selent, C. “Der error sensuum im frühen 12. Jahrhundert. Wie irrtumsanfällig sind olfaktorische, gustatorische und taktile Wahrnemungen? Zwei Miniaturen.” In Irrtum – Error – Erreur, eds. A. Speer and M. Mauriège (Berlin, 2018), 165–178.
-
Siegel, R. E. Galen on Sense Perception: His Doctrines, Observations and Experiments on Vision, Hearing, Smell, Touch and Pain, and Their Historical Sources (Basel, 1970).
-
Silva, J. F. “Augustine on Active Perception.” In Active Perception in the History of Philosophy: From Plato to Modern Philosophy, eds. J. F. Silva and M. Yrjönsuuri (Cham, 2014), 79–98.
-
Silva, J. F. “The Chameleonic Mind: The Activity Versus the Actuality of Perception.” In Medieval Perceptual Puzzles: Theories of Sense Perception in the 13th and 14th Centuries, ed. E. Băltuță (Leiden, 2020), 38–72.
-
Silva, J. F., and C. Thomsen Thörnqvist. “Introduction.” Vivarium 57 (2019), 223–243.
-
Singer, P. N. “Galen on Pneuma: Between Metaphysical Speculation and Anatomical Theory.” In The Concept of Pneuma After Aristotle, eds. S. Coughlin, D. Leith, and O. Lewis (Berlin, 2020), 237–282.
-
Sisko, J. E. “Aristotle on Mind, Perception, and Body.” In Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity, ed. J. E. Sisko. The History of the Philosophy of Mind 1 (Boca Raton, FL, 2019), 194–213.
-
Veit, R. “Al-Magūsī’s Kitāb Al-Malakī and its Latin Translation Ascribed to Constantine the African.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16 (2006), 133–168.
-
Wallis, F. “Medicine and the Senses: Feeling the Pulse, Smelling the Plague, and Listening for the Cure.” In A Cultural History of the Senses in the Middle Ages, ed. R. G. Newhauser (London, 2014), 133–152.
-
Wicher, H. B. “Nemesius Emesenus.” In Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum: Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries: Annotated Lists and Guides, vol. 6, eds. F. E. Cranz, V. Brown and P. O. Kristeller (Washington, DC, 1986), 31–72.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 141 | 141 | 42 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 15 | 15 | 1 |
Sense Perception between Psychology and Elemental Physics
A Reading of Alfanus of Salerno’s Premnon physicon and Constantine the African’s Pantegni
In: VivariumSearch for other papers by María José Ortúzar Escudero in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The southern Italian translations of the second half of the eleventh century represent a turning point in the understanding of human nature in the Latin West. Their account of sense perception offers a comprehension of how the outer world, the body, and the mind interact. The interaction is based on the concepts of elements and their qualities, on the one hand, and immaterial powers of the soul, on the other. The present article investigates how this interaction, including the physiology and psychology of perception, was explained in two widely received translations: Alfanus of Salerno’s Premnon physicon and Constantine the African’s Pantegni. It also underlines the salient aspects in which these explanations differ from the Aristotelian and the Augustinian views of perception, offering to some extent a Galenic-based alternative to them.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 141 | 141 | 42 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 15 | 15 | 1 |
