It is widely recognised that the expression ‘gathering stones and throwing them away’ in Qoh 3:5a presents the most enigmatic phrase within Qohelet’s well-known ‘catalogue of times’. This paper presents a brief overview of the divergent solutions that have been offered throughout its exegetical history, and subsequently evaluates in greater detail the suggestion that the ‘stones’ should be considered a sexual euphemism. Observing that all the arguments provided in favour of this interpretation are flawed, it calls for the development of an alternative interpretation.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
See, e.g., J. Blenkinsopp, “Ecclesiastes 3.1-15: Another Interpretation”, JSOT 66 (1995), pp. 55-64.
See, e.g., M.V. Fox, “Time in Qohelet’s ‘Catalogue of Times’ ”, JNSL 24/1 (1998), pp. 25-39; and more broadly on the book as a whole, D. Rudman, Determinism in the Book of Ecclesiastes ( JSOT SS 316; Sheffield, 2001).
Thus K. Galling, “Das Rätsel der Zeit im Urteil Kohelets (Koh 3,1-15)”, ZThK 58 (1961), p. 7: ‘das Interpretationsrätsel unseres Abschnittes’.
J.A. Loader, “Qohelet 3,2-8—A ‘Sonnet’ in the Old Testament”, ZAW 81 (1969), pp. 240-242; comp. also the elaboration of Loader’s proposal by A.S. Wright, “‘For Everything There is a Season’: The Structure and Meaning of the Fourteen Opposites (Ecclesiastes 3,2-8)”, in M. Carrez – J. Doré – P. Grelot (ed.), De la Tôrah au Messie: études d’exégèse et d’herméneutique bibliques offertes à Henri Cazelles (Paris, 1981), pp. 321-328.
As noted, e.g., by Whybray, “Ecclesiastes 3:2-8”, pp. 478-479.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 365 | 72 | 24 |
Full Text Views | 178 | 3 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 62 | 8 | 4 |
It is widely recognised that the expression ‘gathering stones and throwing them away’ in Qoh 3:5a presents the most enigmatic phrase within Qohelet’s well-known ‘catalogue of times’. This paper presents a brief overview of the divergent solutions that have been offered throughout its exegetical history, and subsequently evaluates in greater detail the suggestion that the ‘stones’ should be considered a sexual euphemism. Observing that all the arguments provided in favour of this interpretation are flawed, it calls for the development of an alternative interpretation.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 365 | 72 | 24 |
Full Text Views | 178 | 3 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 62 | 8 | 4 |