A popular critical theory suggests that the epilogue of Qohelet, which recommends discipline and piety, is a later addition aimed at reconciling the unorthodox ideas of the book with conservative views. While this hypothesis is well-established on the basis of the text’s style and content, no external evidence to support it has ever been suggested. This paper seeks to present an empirical model for this redactional theory from a comparative point of view. It examines the development of the vanity theme in Mesopotamian literature, and shows that the subversive ideas of vanity literature gave rise, from the very beginning, to redactional activity focused on re-interpreting it in light of traditional values. Several examples of this process of conservative redaction are discussed, including Sumerian, Akkadian, and Akkadian-Biblical cases. The theory that the final verses of Qohelet are a later interpolation thus gains credibility in light of similar phenomena in Mesopotamian literature.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ibid., pp. 371-374.
Alster, Wisdom of Ancient Sumer, pp. 265-340. See also Lambert, “Some New Babylonian Wisdom Literature”, who speaks about ‘the futility theme’.
Alster, Wisdom of Ancient Sumer, pp. 267-269. Alster’s classification is not without problems, and is being followed here for the sake of convenience. The question of the relation between the different versions of this work requires further study.
Alster, Wisdom of Ancient Sumer, p. 272. The complement “[life is found]” relies on the identical couplet which appears, in a better state of preservation, in one of the versions of the Ballad of Early Rulers (see below).
See lately Cohen, Wisdom from the Late Bronze Age, pp. 145-148, with further bibliography.
See Lambert, Babylonian Wisdom Literature, pp. 107-109; Von Soden, Texte, p. 169, with improved readings.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 345 | 117 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 250 | 4 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 101 | 10 | 3 |
A popular critical theory suggests that the epilogue of Qohelet, which recommends discipline and piety, is a later addition aimed at reconciling the unorthodox ideas of the book with conservative views. While this hypothesis is well-established on the basis of the text’s style and content, no external evidence to support it has ever been suggested. This paper seeks to present an empirical model for this redactional theory from a comparative point of view. It examines the development of the vanity theme in Mesopotamian literature, and shows that the subversive ideas of vanity literature gave rise, from the very beginning, to redactional activity focused on re-interpreting it in light of traditional values. Several examples of this process of conservative redaction are discussed, including Sumerian, Akkadian, and Akkadian-Biblical cases. The theory that the final verses of Qohelet are a later interpolation thus gains credibility in light of similar phenomena in Mesopotamian literature.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 345 | 117 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 250 | 4 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 101 | 10 | 3 |