A New Look at the Biological Sex/Grammatical Gender of Jonah’s Fish

In: Vetus Testamentum
View More View Less
  • 1 School of Divinity, History and Philosophy, King’s Quadrangle, King’s College, Aberdeen
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


This article proposes a new understanding of the form דגה in Jonah 2:2. As is relatively well-known among biblical scholars, the fish in Jonah seemingly changes biological sex / grammatical gender within the narrative. While Jonah 2:1 and 11 appear to refer to a fish, Jonah 2:2 speaks of a fish. This intricate textual situation has generated a wide range of more or less fanciful interpretations, ranging from text-historical solutions, via narratological suggestions, to the appearance of multiple fish. The present paper challenges these suggestions and ultimately argues that the form דגה in Jonah 2:2 is a lengthened nominal form. These extremely rare forms often appear in the end of a clause. Other examples of such forms are attested in Job 34:13; 37:12; and Ezek 8:2, as well as in the geographical name Jahaz / Jahza. The current Masoretic accentuation of דגה as a form is a result of a misunderstanding of this archaic longer form.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 565 120 7
Full Text Views 336 18 1
PDF Views & Downloads 147 57 2