Jeffrey H. Tigay, Deuteronomy: The Traditional Hebrew Text with the New JPS Translation (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1996), p. 124.

Jeffrey H. Tigay, Deuteronomy: The Traditional Hebrew Text with the New JPS Translation (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1996), p. 124.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

David A. Glatt-Gilad, “Chronicles as Consensus Literature,” in What Was Authoritative for Chronicles? (ed. Ehud Ben Zvi and Diana Edelman; Winona Lake, in: Eisenbrauns, 2011), pp. 73-74. However, Jonker rightly cautions against an overly text-dependent conception of the Chronicler’s use of Pentateuchal traditions; see Louis C. Jonker, “From Paraleipomenon to Early Reader: The Implications of Recent Chronicles Studies for Pentateuchal Criticism,” in Congress Volume Munich 2013 (ed. Christl M. Maier; Leiden: Brill, 2014), pp. 220-225.

David A. Glatt-Gilad, “Chronicles as Consensus Literature,” in What Was Authoritative for Chronicles? (ed. Ehud Ben Zvi and Diana Edelman; Winona Lake, in: Eisenbrauns, 2011), pp. 73-74. However, Jonker rightly cautions against an overly text-dependent conception of the Chronicler’s use of Pentateuchal traditions; see Louis C. Jonker, “From Paraleipomenon to Early Reader: The Implications of Recent Chronicles Studies for Pentateuchal Criticism,” in Congress Volume Munich 2013 (ed. Christl M. Maier; Leiden: Brill, 2014), pp. 220-225.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Richard D. Nelson, “The Deuteronomistic Historian in Samuel: ‘The Man behind the Green Curtain,’ ” in Is Samuel Among the Deuteronomists, pp. 24-26.

Richard D. Nelson, “The Deuteronomistic Historian in Samuel: ‘The Man behind the Green Curtain,’ ” in Is Samuel Among the Deuteronomists, pp. 24-26.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

McKenzie observes, “Saul is an honored guest. The thigh is usually reserved for the deity or priests.” Steven L. McKenzie, “1 and 2 Samuel,” in The New Oxford Annotated Bible, Michael D. Coogan, ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 413.

McKenzie observes, “Saul is an honored guest. The thigh is usually reserved for the deity or priests.” Steven L. McKenzie, “1 and 2 Samuel,” in The New Oxford Annotated Bible, Michael D. Coogan, ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 413.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Marsha C. White, “Saul and Jonathan in 1 Samuel 1 and 14,” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; fat 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), pp. 119-138. See also V. Philips Long, The Reign and Rejection of King Saul: A Case for Literary and Theological Coherence (sblds 118; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989).

Marsha C. White, “Saul and Jonathan in 1 Samuel 1 and 14,” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; fat 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), pp. 119-138. See also V. Philips Long, The Reign and Rejection of King Saul: A Case for Literary and Theological Coherence (sblds 118; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ehud Ben Zvi, “Are There Any Bridges Out There? How Wide Was the Conceptual Gap Between the Deuteronomistic History and Chronicles?” in Community Identity in Judean Historiography: Biblical and Comparative Perspectives (ed. Gary N. Knoppers and Kenneth A Ristau; Winona Lake, in: Eisenbrauns, 2009), pp. 59-86; Gary N. Knoppers, “The Relationship of the Deuteronomistic History to Chronicles: Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist?” in Congress Volume Helsinki 2010 (ed. Martti Nissinen; VTSup 148; Leiden: Brill, 2012), pp. 307-341; Louis C. Jonker, “Was the Chronicler More Deuteronomic Than the Deuteronomist? Explorations into the Chronicler’s Relationship with Deuteronomic Legal Traditions,” sjot 27 (2013): pp. 191-203.

Ehud Ben Zvi, “Are There Any Bridges Out There? How Wide Was the Conceptual Gap Between the Deuteronomistic History and Chronicles?” in Community Identity in Judean Historiography: Biblical and Comparative Perspectives (ed. Gary N. Knoppers and Kenneth A Ristau; Winona Lake, in: Eisenbrauns, 2009), pp. 59-86; Gary N. Knoppers, “The Relationship of the Deuteronomistic History to Chronicles: Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist?” in Congress Volume Helsinki 2010 (ed. Martti Nissinen; VTSup 148; Leiden: Brill, 2012), pp. 307-341; Louis C. Jonker, “Was the Chronicler More Deuteronomic Than the Deuteronomist? Explorations into the Chronicler’s Relationship with Deuteronomic Legal Traditions,” sjot 27 (2013): pp. 191-203.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

David A. Glatt-Gilad, “Chronicles as Consensus Literature,” in What Was Authoritative for Chronicles? (ed. Ehud Ben Zvi and Diana Edelman; Winona Lake, in: Eisenbrauns, 2011), pp. 73-74.

David A. Glatt-Gilad, “Chronicles as Consensus Literature,” in What Was Authoritative for Chronicles? (ed. Ehud Ben Zvi and Diana Edelman; Winona Lake, in: Eisenbrauns, 2011), pp. 73-74.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See Gary N. Knoppers, “Israel’s First King and ‘The Kingdom of YHWH in the Hands of the Sons of David’: The Place of the Saulide Monarchy in the Chronicler’s Historiography,” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; fat 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), pp. 189-191; and also Benjamin D. Giffone, Sit At My Right Hand: The Chronicler’s Portrait of the Tribe of Benjamin in the Social Context of Yehud (lhbots 628; London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2016), pp. 189-190.

See Gary N. Knoppers, “Israel’s First King and ‘The Kingdom of YHWH in the Hands of the Sons of David’: The Place of the Saulide Monarchy in the Chronicler’s Historiography,” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; fat 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), pp. 189-191; and also Benjamin D. Giffone, Sit At My Right Hand: The Chronicler’s Portrait of the Tribe of Benjamin in the Social Context of Yehud (lhbots 628; London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2016), pp. 189-190.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See Yairah Amit, “Araunah’s Threshing Floor: A Lesson in Shaping Historical Memory,” in What Was Authoritative for Chronicles, pp. 133-144; Louis C. Jonker, “Of Jebus, Jerusalem and Benjamin: The Chronicler’s Sondergut in 1 Chronicles 21 Against the Background of the Late Persian Era in Yehud,” in Chronicling the Chronicler: The Book of Chronicles and Early Second Temple Historiography (ed. Tyler F. Williams and Paul S. Evans; Winona Lake, in: Eisenbrauns, 2013), pp. 81-102.

See Yairah Amit, “Araunah’s Threshing Floor: A Lesson in Shaping Historical Memory,” in What Was Authoritative for Chronicles, pp. 133-144; Louis C. Jonker, “Of Jebus, Jerusalem and Benjamin: The Chronicler’s Sondergut in 1 Chronicles 21 Against the Background of the Late Persian Era in Yehud,” in Chronicling the Chronicler: The Book of Chronicles and Early Second Temple Historiography (ed. Tyler F. Williams and Paul S. Evans; Winona Lake, in: Eisenbrauns, 2013), pp. 81-102.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Knoppers, “Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist,” p. 312.

Knoppers, “Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist,” p. 312.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Knoppers, “Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist,” p. 327.

Knoppers, “Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist,” p. 327.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Knoppers, “Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist,” p. 327.

Knoppers, “Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist,” p. 327.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Knoppers, “Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist,” p. 327.

Knoppers, “Was the Chronicler a Deuteronomist,” p. 327.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Jürg Hutzli, “The Distinctiveness of the Samuel Narrative Tradition,” in Is Samuel Among the Deuteronomists, p. 181.

Jürg Hutzli, “The Distinctiveness of the Samuel Narrative Tradition,” in Is Samuel Among the Deuteronomists, p. 181.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation