It has been proposed recently to read the heavily fragmented plaster inscription 4.3 from Kuntillet ʿAjrud as an attestation of the Exodus tradition. Based on the marked differences from the comparative biblical material, far-reaching conclusions regarding the evolution of the Exodus tradition have been drawn. But the reading suffers from serious problems.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Na’aman, “The Inscriptions of Kuntillet ʿAjrud Through the Lens of Historical Research”, p. 312.
Ibid., p. 312.
Na’aman, “The Inscriptions of Kuntillet ʿAjrud Through the Lens of Historical Research”, p. 310.
Ibid., p. 311.
Ibid., p. 312, n. 4.
Aḥituv, Eshel, and Meshel, “Inscriptions and their Interpretation”, p. 115.
Na’aman, “The Inscriptions of Kuntillet ʿAjrud Through the Lens of Historical Research”, p. 311.
As is done by Puech, “Les inscriptions hébraïques de Kuntillet ʿAjrud (Sinaï)”, p. 182.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 325 | 97 | 6 |
Full Text Views | 227 | 6 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 147 | 17 | 2 |
It has been proposed recently to read the heavily fragmented plaster inscription 4.3 from Kuntillet ʿAjrud as an attestation of the Exodus tradition. Based on the marked differences from the comparative biblical material, far-reaching conclusions regarding the evolution of the Exodus tradition have been drawn. But the reading suffers from serious problems.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 325 | 97 | 6 |
Full Text Views | 227 | 6 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 147 | 17 | 2 |