Intersectionality, Gender Liminality and Ben Sira’s Attitude to the Eunuch
In: Vetus TestamentumSearch for other papers by Helena M. Bolle in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Stephen R. Llewelyn in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Ben Sira twice cites the eunuch in sayings that play on his sexual impotence. In so doing he diverges from what we know of the Hebraic tradition before him. Blending theory is used to interpret the sayings and their apparently malicious intent. After appraising the ambiguous status/identity of the eunuch in terms of ‘intersectionality’, Ben Sira’s attitude is contextualised using the concepts of ‘gender liminality’ and ‘hybridity’ and set against the strict binary system that underlies his understanding of gender more generally. It is suggested that Ben Sira’s theology of creation, like that of the Wisdom tradition more generally, forms the principal basis for this binary system. At the same time, the more accepting attitude to the eunuch in Isaiah 56 is considered and its notion of the ‘new creation’.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 447 | 51 | 2 |
| Full Text Views | 367 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 217 | 5 | 0 |
Intersectionality, Gender Liminality and Ben Sira’s Attitude to the Eunuch
In: Vetus TestamentumSearch for other papers by Helena M. Bolle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephen R. Llewelyn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Ben Sira twice cites the eunuch in sayings that play on his sexual impotence. In so doing he diverges from what we know of the Hebraic tradition before him. Blending theory is used to interpret the sayings and their apparently malicious intent. After appraising the ambiguous status/identity of the eunuch in terms of ‘intersectionality’, Ben Sira’s attitude is contextualised using the concepts of ‘gender liminality’ and ‘hybridity’ and set against the strict binary system that underlies his understanding of gender more generally. It is suggested that Ben Sira’s theology of creation, like that of the Wisdom tradition more generally, forms the principal basis for this binary system. At the same time, the more accepting attitude to the eunuch in Isaiah 56 is considered and its notion of the ‘new creation’.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 447 | 51 | 2 |
| Full Text Views | 367 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 217 | 5 | 0 |