Contrasting Conceptions of Asylum in Deuteronomy 19 and Numbers 35

in Vetus Testamentum
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



This essay argues that the Deuteronomic and Holiness laws granting asylum to unintentional killers (Deut 19:1-13; Num 35:9-34) differ markedly in their procedures and purposes. The differences between these laws reflect different underlying conceptions of bloodguilt. For Deuteronomy, bloodguilt is created only in the presence of homicidal intention. For the Holiness legislators, bloodguilt is created whenever human blood is shed. These differing conceptions of bloodguilt are reflected in the status each law accords to the manslayer, the role of the blood avenger, the purpose and duration of asylum, and the features of asylum locations.

Vetus Testamentum

A Quarterly Published by the International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament



  • Differences between Deuteronomic and Holiness Asylum Laws.
    View in gallery


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 20 20 13
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0