Taking a look at Lot through the lens of Biblical Masculinity Studies, we see him constantly trying to meet ideals of a performance of hegemonic masculinity but failing to do so. This paper uncovers masculinity as the motor of the narrative in the Lot stories, especially in Gen 19. The stories make fun of Lot and his offspring, the Moabites and Ammonites, as “failed” men. This paper analyses how this is achieved by the authors. Masculinity and masculine traits are artistically and deliberately used as a highly idealised background foil in order to highlight Lot’s failure. Furthermore, the authors’ point of view is highly ideological. They are in a superior and dominant position from which they portray Lot and his masculinity. They do this from safe distance, since they themselves are not represented in the stories by a character.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Assante, Julia. “Men Looking at Men: The Homoerotics of Power in the State Arts of Assyria.” Pages 42–82 in Being a Man: Negotiating Ancient Constructs of Masculinity. Edited by Ilona Zsolnay. SHANE. London: Routledge, 2019.
Athas, George. “Has Lot Lost the Plot? Detail Omission and a Reconsideration of Genesis 19.” JHS 16 (2016): 1–18.
Bailey, Randall C. “Why Do Readers Believe Lot? Genesis 19 Reconsidered.” OTE 23 (2010): 519–548.
Bar-Asher, Elitzur Avraham. “An Explanation of the Etymology of the Name Ammon in Genesis 19, Based on Evidence from Nabataean Aramaic and the Safaitic Arabian Dialect.” ZAH 17 (2004): 3–10.
Bechtel, Lyn M. “A Feminist Reading of Gen 19.1–11.” Pages 108–128 in Genesis: A Feminist Companion. Edited by Athalya Brenner. FCB 1/2. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.
Carrigan, Tim, Bob Connell, and John Lee. “Towards a New Sociology of Masculinity.” Theory and Society 14 (1985): 551–604.
Chapman, Cynthia R. The Gendered Language of Warfare in the Israelite-Assyrian Encounter. Harvard Semitic Museum Publications 62. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2004.
Clines, David J. “David the Man: The Construction of Masculinity in the Hebrew Bible.” Pages 212–243 in Interested Parties: The Ideology of Writers and Readers of the Hebrew Bible. Edited by David J. Clines. JSOTSup 205. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995.
Connell, Raewyn. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
Connell, Robert W., and James W. Messerschmidt. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.” Gender and Society 19 (2005): 829–859.
Cooper, Jerrold S. “Female Trouble and Troubled Males: Roiled Seas, Decadent Royals and Mesopotamian Masculinities in Myth and Practice.” Pages 112–124 in Being a Man: Negotiating Ancient Constructs of Masculinity. Edited by Ilona Zsolnay. SHANE. London: Routledge, 2019.
Creangă, Ovidiu. “Introduction.” Pages 1–16 in Hebrew Masculinities Anew. Edited by Ovidiu Creangă. Hebrew Bible monographs 72. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2019.
Graybill, Rhiannon, and Peter J. Sabo. “Caves of the Hebrew Bible: A Speleology.” BibInt 26 (2018): 1–22.
Guinan, Ann K., and Peter Morris. “Mesopotamia Before and After Sodom: Colleagues, Crack Troops, Comrades-in-Armes.” Pages 150–175 in Being a Man: Negotiating Ancient Constructs of Masculinity. Edited by Ilona Zsolnay. SHANE. London: Routledge, 2019.
Gunkel, Hermann. Genesis. HKAT I/1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1922.
Haddox, Susan E. “Masculinity and Femininity: Hebrew Bible.” Pages 512–518 in The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Gender Studies. Vol. 1. Edited by Julia M. O’Brien. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Haddox, Susan E. “Masculinity Studies of the Hebrew Bible: The First Two Decades.” CurBR 14 (2016): 176–206.
Hamilton, Victor P. The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1–17. NICOT. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1990.
Irvine, Stuart A. “Is Anything Too Hard for Yahweh? Fulfillment of Promise and Threat in Genesis 18–19.” JSOT 42 (2018): 285–302.
Kirova, Milena. “Old Age and Masculinity in the Hebrew Bible.” Pages 151–170 in Hebrew Masculinities Anew. Edited by Ovidiu Creangă. Hebrew Bible monographs 79. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2019.
Lipka, Hilary B. Sexual Transgression in the Hebrew Bible. Hebrew Bible monographs 7. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2006.
Lipka, Hilary B. “Masculinities in Proverbs: An Alternative to the Hegemonic Ideal.” Pages 86–103 in Biblical Masculinities Foregrounded. Edited by Ovidiu Creangă and Peter-Ben Smit. Hebrew Bible monographs 62. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014.
Lipka, Hilary B. “Sexual Violence: Ancient Near East.” Pages 341–350 in The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Gender Studies. Vol. 2. Edited by Julia M. O’Brien. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Lipka, Hilary B. “Queen Jezebel’s Masculinity.” Pages 125–150 in Hebrew Masculinities Anew. Edited by Ovidiu Creangă. Hebrew Bible monographs 79. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2019.
Lipka, Hilary B. “Shaved Beards and Bared Buttocks: Shame and the Undermining of Masculine Performance in Biblical Texts.” Pages 176–197 in Being a Man: Negotiating Ancient Constructs of Masculinity. Edited by Ilona Zsolnay. SHANE. London: Routledge, 2019.
Macwilliam, Stuart. “Final Reflections on Hebrew Masculinities Anew.” Pages 193–300 in Hebrew Masculinities Anew. Edited by Ovidiu Creangă. Hebrew Bible monographs 79. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2019.
Morschauser, Scott. “‘Hospitality’, Hostiles and Hostages: On the Legal Background to Genesis 19.1–9.” JSOT 27 (2003): 461–485.
Muth, Susanne. “Zur historischen Interpretation medialer Gewalt: Darstellungen von Leiden und Sterben im Athen des späten 6. und frühen 5. Jahrhundert v. Chr.” Pages 193–229 in Extreme Formen von Gewalt in Bild und Text des Altertums. Edited by Martin Zimmermann. Münchner Studien zur Alten Welt 5. München: Herbert Utz, 2009.
Nissinen, Martti. Homoeroticism in the Biblical World: A Historical Perspective Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1998.
Nissinen, Martti. “Biblical Masculinities: Musing on Theory and Agenda.” Pages 271–285 in Biblical Masculinities Foregrounded. Edited by Ovidiu Creangă and Peter-Ben Smit. Hebrew Bible monographs 62. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014.
Peled, Ilan. “Visualizing Masculinities: The Gala, Hegemony and Mesopotamian Iconography.” NEA 79 (2016): 158–165.
Rad, Gerhard von. Das erste Buch Mose: Genesis. ATD 2/4. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1976.
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomit. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London: Routledge, 2003.
Ruppert, Lothar. Genesis: Ein kritischer und theologischer Kommentar; 2. Teilband, Gen 11,27–25,18. FB 98. Würzburg: Echter, 2002.
Safren, Jonathan. “Hospitality Compared: Abraham and Lot as Hosts.” Pages 157–178 in Know Your Neighbor: Universalism and Particularism at Sodom and Gomorrah; Essays in Memory of Ron Pirson. Edited by Diana Lipton. AIL 11. Atlanta: SBL Press, 2012.
Sarna, Nahum M. Genesis: The JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society, 1989.
Seebass, Horst. Genesis II: Vätergeschichte I (11,27–22,24). Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener, 1997.
Smit, Peter-Ben. “Masculinity and the Bible: Survey, Models, and Perspectives.” Brill Research Perspectives in Biblical Interpretation 2/1 (2017): 1–97.
Washington, Harold C. “Sexual Violence: Hebrew Bible.” Pages 350–356 in The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Gender Studies. Edited by Julia M. O’Brien. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Willi-Plein, Ina. Das Buch Genesis: Kapitel 12–50. NSKAT 1/2. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 2011.
Wilson, Stephen M. “Biblical Masculinity Studies and Multiple Masculinities Theory: Past, Present, and Future.” Pages 19–40 in Hebrew Masculinities Anew. Edited by Ovidiu Creangă. Hebrew Bible monographs 79. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2019.
Winkler, Mathias. “The Ancestors’ Masculinities in Genesis.” JSOT, forthcoming.
Wolde, Ellen van. “Cognitive Grammar at Work in Sodom and Gomorrah.” Pages 193–221 in Cognitive Linguistic Explorations in Biblical Studies. Edited by Bonnie Howe, and Joel B. Green. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 697 | 185 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 94 | 23 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 275 | 61 | 0 |
Taking a look at Lot through the lens of Biblical Masculinity Studies, we see him constantly trying to meet ideals of a performance of hegemonic masculinity but failing to do so. This paper uncovers masculinity as the motor of the narrative in the Lot stories, especially in Gen 19. The stories make fun of Lot and his offspring, the Moabites and Ammonites, as “failed” men. This paper analyses how this is achieved by the authors. Masculinity and masculine traits are artistically and deliberately used as a highly idealised background foil in order to highlight Lot’s failure. Furthermore, the authors’ point of view is highly ideological. They are in a superior and dominant position from which they portray Lot and his masculinity. They do this from safe distance, since they themselves are not represented in the stories by a character.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 697 | 185 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 94 | 23 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 275 | 61 | 0 |